EmoTrace-Bench: Diagnosing Emotional Expression in Text-to-Video Generation through Controlled Cues and Intensity

Recent video generation models can produce highly realistic videos from natural language instructions, with visual quality approaching cinematic standards. Existing evaluation benchmarks, however, predominantly assess visual quality, aesthetic appeal and physical plausibility, while paying limited attention to text, an essential medium for conveying information in everyday scenes. A generated video may appear visually compelling and feature lifelike subjects, yet still render the text within the scene incorrectly. To address this overlooked dimension, we introduce VTR-Bench, a systematic benchmark for evaluating the Visual Text Rendering capabilities of video generation models. VTR-Bench situates text within concrete application scenarios, such as advertisements and scientific videos, with 300 carefully constructed prompts spanning five scenario categories. We develop an automated evaluation pipeline with human alignments that separately assesses text fidelity through carrier-specific transcription and scene and motion requirements through a prompt-specific chain of query. Beyond evaluation, we introduce a Keyframe-Guided Agentic Framework in which a Director agent coordinates image and video generation with visual evaluation, guiding iterative refinement and candidate selection through visual feedback. Experiments on 11 state-of-the-art models reveal widespread difficulties in accurately rendering scene text, with the best-performing model recording an overall word error rate (WER) of 0.250. We further analyze text rendering failures to characterize the challenges faced by current video generation models. These findings highlight visual text rendering as a key challenge for video generation and demonstrate a practical path toward improvement. Code is available at https://github.com/hardenyu21/VTR-Bench.

Rapid advances in artificial intelligence-generated content (AIGC) have significantly promoted using text-to-image (T2I) models to generate images with specific affective intentions. However, the emotional effects conveyed by generated images frequently deviate from target expectations, and it remains unclear whether multimodal large language models (MLLMs) can reliably interpret the emotion of AI-generated visual content. Existing affective benchmarks are predominantly built on natural images, while affective studies of generated images have largely focused on emotions expressed in portraits, lacking a unified benchmark for studying the emotions expressed and evoked by generated images. We therefore introduce EmoGenie, a benchmark of emotion for AI-generated images that evaluates capabilities in T2I generation and MLLM understanding across expressed and evoked emotions. It comprises 6,400 images generated by eight T2I models using 800 emotion-targeted prompts, annotated with question-answer (QA) pairs, termed EmoGenie-QA, and continuous human ratings, termed EmoGenie-Assess. EmoGenie-QA contains 90,000 closed-set questions in single-image and image-pair settings, as well as 1,057 open-ended questions for emotion description. EmoGenie-Assess benchmarks continuous affective and aesthetic prediction using 13,175 mean opinion scores (MOSs) aggregated from human ratings in terms of valence, arousal, dominance, and aesthetic quality. We further develop EmoProbe, which combines emotion question answering with response-aligned, dimension-specific regression heads for continuous score prediction. Experimental results show that EmoProbe achieves superior results on emotion-related QA tasks, while its affective and aesthetic predictions correlate better with human ratings, demonstrating its state-of-the-art capabilities of unified coarse-to-fine affective understanding for AI-generated images.

Modern video generators can synthesize convincing scenes while rendering a few characters incorrectly, omitting requested text, or changing it across frames. Measuring these failures is harder than applying OCR independently to each frame: when a scene contains multiple text targets and multiple noisy OCR regions, the evaluator must first determine which observation belongs to which intended text. We introduce TextVBench, a benchmark and evaluation framework that formulates visual-text evaluation as a multi-target, multi-instance spatiotemporal correspondence problem. TextVBench contains two complementary tracks: TextVBench-T2V measures the creation and maintenance of prompt-specified text, while TextVBench-Ref2V measures preservation of text from reference images. Both tracks use target-conditioned candidate selection rather than unconstrained VLM transcription, support one target mapping to multiple OCR regions, and separate frame-level spatial fidelity from cross-frame temporal fidelity. A length-weighted harmonic score summarizes these factors, while extra-text diagnostics expose failure modes hidden by a single OCR score. The benchmark is organized around controlled text, layout, carrier, and motion attributes so that aggregate scores can be traced back to specific capability limits. Across the evaluated model runs, MiniMax-H3 reaches a T2V TextVScore of 68.32, while the strongest Ref2V score is 56.51; attribute slices reveal a pronounced drop as the number of simultaneous reference text regions increases.