Rate-Resolved Text Evaluation with Masked Diffusion Language Models

Autoregressive language models are widely used for text evaluation, however, their left-to-right factorization introduces positional bias, i.e., early tokens are scored with only leftward context, conflating architectural asymmetry with true text quality. We propose masked reconstruction as an alternative paradigm, where every token is scored using full bidirectional context. We introduce DiffScore, an evaluation framework built on Masked Large Diffusion Language Models. By measuring text recoverability across continuous masking rates, DiffScore eliminates positional bias and naturally establishes an evaluation hierarchy from local fluency to global coherence. We further provide diagnostic tools unavailable to autoregressive frameworks: multi-timestep quality profiles that decompose scores across masking rates, and bidirectional PMI decomposition that disentangles fluency from faithfulness. Experiments across ten benchmarks show that DiffScore consistently outperforms autoregressive baselines in both zero-shot and fine-tuned settings. The code is released at: https://github.com/wenlai-lavine/DiffScore.

Masked diffusion models (MDMs) generate text by iteratively selecting positions to unmask and then predicting tokens at those positions. Yet MDMs lack proper likelihood evaluation: the evidence lower bound (ELBO) is not only a loose bound on log-likelihood, but, as we show, is also computed under the training distribution rather than the test-time distribution. We resolve this within our DUEL framework, which unifies leading MDM sampling strategies that employ $\textit{deterministic}$ position selection. We prove that DUEL samplers admit $\textbf{exact likelihood computation under the test-time distribution}$ -- giving MDMs $\textit{proper}$ likelihood, and hence proper perplexity, for the first time. This proper perplexity is the natural analogue of autoregressive perplexity and lets us revisit key questions about MDMs. $\textbf{MDMs are substantially better than previously thought}$: the MDM-autoregressive perplexity gap shrinks by up to $32\%$ on in-domain data and $82\%$ on zero-shot benchmarks. DUEL enables the first principled comparison of fast,parallel samplers across compute budgets -- an analysis impossible with the ELBO and unreliable with generative perplexity -- identifying a strong default method. Finally, oracle search over position orderings reveals MDMs can far surpass autoregressive models -- achieving $36.47$ vs. $52.11$ perplexity on AG News -- demonstrating the ceiling of MDM performance has not yet been reached.

Masked diffusion language models generate text by iteratively unmasking many tokens in parallel, but this speed comes with a correction problem: tokens generated in the same step are predicted from marginal distributions, and early local dependency errors can later contaminate the context. PRISM addresses this by learning token-level quality scores and remasking unreliable tokens, but its inference rule is coupled: the same forward pass both detects low-quality tokens and computes logits for their replacements, so the erroneous tokens still condition regeneration. We propose NAVIRA, an inference-time decoding policy that separates these two operations and samples remasking positions stochastically. A first forward pass scores tokens; selected tokens are masked; a second forward pass regenerates from the cleaned context. Temperature-controlled remasking reduces repeated correction of the same positions and balances fluency against diversity. In controlled experiments with a 170M masked diffusion language model, decoupling improves fluency, while scheduled stochastic remasking preserves entropy and achieves stronger LLM-judge scores under larger forward-pass budgets. These results show that remasking policy, not only the learned quality signal, is central to reliable masked-diffusion text generation.