cs.LGOct 14, 2026

Robust Explanatory Analysis for Structured Optimization Networks (REASON) in Learning

Authors: Vahid Jebraeeli, Hamid Krim, Keisuke Fujii

Organizations: ECE Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA · Graduate School of Informatics, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan

Abstract

We seek a hierarchical resolution of residual error under a composite learning objective as a principled mechanism for identifying and exploiting additional information, particularly under distribution shift and perturbation. Inspired by the System 1/System 2 paradigm, we formulate this principle as a two-loop mechanism serving a common inference goal. A fast, System 1-like loop resolves the residual addressable by the available evidence; the remaining epistemic residual triggers a medium speed, System 2-like loop that actively acquires additional evidence and measures its informational value through residual reduction. Over nested solution spaces, the medium-loop optimum is provably no worse than the fast-loop optimum. Experiments show that the resulting two-loop model consistently improves upon the fast loop at approximately half the computation of the medium loop, including under unseen corruptions, and, when provided a cleaner observation, outperforms staged classifiers and learning-to-defer methods at equal computational cost.

Figures & tables

Explore similar work

Apr 2, 2026

Robust Learning with Optimal Error

We construct algorithms with optimal error for learning with adversarial noise. The overarching theme of this work is that the use of randomized hypotheses can substantially improve upon the best error rates achievable with deterministic hypotheses. - For ηη-rate malicious noise, we show the optimal error is 12⋅η/(1−η)\frac{1}{2} \cdot η/(1-η), improving on the optimal error of deterministic hypotheses by a factor of 1/21/2. This answers an open question of Cesa-Bianchi et al. (JACM 1999) who showed randomness can improve error by a factor of 6/76/7. - For ηη-rate nasty noise, we show the optimal error is 32⋅η\frac{3}{2} \cdot η for distribution-independent learners and ηη for fixed-distribution learners, both improving upon the optimal 2η2 η error of deterministic hypotheses. This closes a gap first noted by Bshouty et al. (Theoretical Computer Science 2002) when they introduced nasty noise and reiterated in the recent works of Klivans et al. (NeurIPS 2025) and Blanc et al. (SODA 2026). - For ηη-rate agnostic noise and the closely related nasty classification noise model, we show the optimal error is ηη, improving upon the optimal 2η2η error of deterministic hypotheses. All of our learners have sample complexity linear in the VC-dimension of the concept class and polynomial in the inverse excess error. All except for the fixed-distribution nasty noise learner are time efficient given access to an oracle for empirical risk minimization.
Mar 19, 2026

Hierarchical Latent Structure Learning through Online Inference

Learning systems must balance generalization across experiences with discrimination of task-relevant details. Effective learning therefore requires representations that support both. Online latent-cause models support incremental inference but assume flat partitions, whereas hierarchical Bayesian models capture multilevel structure but typically require offline inference. We introduce the Hierarchical Online Learning of Multiscale Experience Structure (HOLMES) model, a computational framework for hierarchical latent structure learning through online inference. HOLMES combines a variation on the nested Chinese Restaurant Process prior with sequential Monte Carlo inference to perform tractable trial-by-trial inference over hierarchical latent representations without explicit supervision over the latent structure. In simulations, HOLMES matched the predictive performance of flat models while learning more compact representations that supported one-shot backward transfer to higher-level latent categories. In a forward transfer task, HOLMES additionally achieved above-chance outcome prediction for stimuli with never-before-seen feature combinations, by exploiting abstract shape-level representations learned across diverse training instances. These results provide a tractable computational framework for discovering hierarchical structure in sequential data.
Sep 4, 2026

Learning-Augmented Algorithms: Guarantees, Construction Mechanisms, and System-Level Implications

Learning-augmented algorithms use fallible predictions while retaining formal performance guarantees. This survey synthesizes prediction interfaces, error measures, consistency--robustness trade-offs, and five representative construction mechanisms across online optimization, caching, learned data structures, graph problems, and mechanism design. An orthogonal theorem-level axis distinguishes achieved upper bounds from matched asymptotic dependence. Formal guarantees are separated from empirical systems evidence, with explicit treatment of prediction cost, feedback, and composition. The resulting synthesis states sufficient conditions for limited end-to-end reasoning and delineates open problems in cost-aware prediction, endogenous error, semantic predictors, and benchmarking.