Reusing Calibration Gains across Model Representations

Learned post-training quantization (PTQ) calibration fits quantizer parameters on a small calibration set, and for a text embedder the natural supervision is retrieval relevance. We ask two questions that are usually conflated: how far to calibrate, and whether to calibrate at all. Across three embedders (e5-base-v2, BGE-M3, EmbeddingGemma-300m) at 4-bit weight quantization, 161 calibration runs, the outcome of a fixed procedure ranges from a gain to catastrophic degradation, and the driver is the dose of the update, measured as the functional displacement D_func of the quantized model from its uncalibrated start. On EmbeddingGemma the same learning-rate grid gives +1.47 to -71.53 points of in-domain NDCG@10 change; a label-free cosine objective collapses at the same dose (-69.52 vs -71.63), so the collapse is a property of learnable calibration rather than of retrieval supervision. Objective sensitivity is heterogeneous: on e5, ranking calibration is substantially more robust than cosine at matched displacement (+14.16 +/- 4.34 pp, 95% t-CI [+3.37, +24.96], three paired slates), whereas on BGE-M3 the ordering is directionally opposite but unresolved ([-5.18, +2.38]). Dose is the main axis but not a sufficient statistic: equal D_func reached along different paths differs by up to 1.61 pp. We therefore treat calibration as an optional intervention. A pre-registered rule that accepts a checkpoint only when a per-query paired confidence interval on a 25% calibration-validation split clears the uncalibrated baseline was run on 6 independent slates and five arms. It never selected a checkpoint below its slate's baseline (0 harmful selections in 30 decisions), retained 8 of 11 beneficial updates, and paid a mean oracle regret of 1.52 pp with one abstention that forfeited 11.13 pp, a safety-opportunity trade-off, not a free improvement. We report what remains open, including label efficiency.

Post-Training Quantization (PTQ) compresses large language models to low bit-widths using a small calibration set, and its quality depends strongly on which samples are chosen. We identify a failure mode in which calibration samples fail to activate outlier channels, hidden dimensions with unusually large activations, causing the quantizer to underestimate their dynamic range and producing per-channel reconstruction errors that dominate layer-wise loss. Motivated by this observation, we argue that PTQ calibration quality is governed more by weighted outlier-channel coverage than by generic sample representativeness, and formulate calibration selection as a weighted set cover problem over outlier channels. The objective is monotone submodular, and the greedy algorithm, COVERCAL, operates on pre-computed activation statistics and requires no GPU time at selection. We further show that the weight choice is internally consistent: under a stylized clipping model, missed weighted coverage upper-bounds surrogate loss, justifying the weighted coverage objective as principled rather than purely empirical. Across LLaMA-2, LLaMA-3, and Mistral, under AWQ and GPTQ backends and five downstream evaluations, COVERCAL improves over random, max-perplexity, max-activation-variance, and stratified baselines, with the largest gains at small calibration budgets. At INT4 with 128 samples, COVERCAL improves MMLU by 1.2 to 1.5 points over random calibration and reduces perplexity degradation by 15 to 30%; with 64 samples, it matches or exceeds random calibration at 256. The contribution is not a new PTQ backend but a formulation of calibration selection as weighted outlier coverage, with a simple, efficient algorithm and a surrogate-based justification.

Post-training quantization (PTQ) compresses large language models by mapping weights to low-bit representations. While much work has focused on how weights are rounded onto the quantization grid, the scaling factor that defines the grid is typically chosen with simple, data-free heuristics. We observe that, under round-to-nearest (RTN) quantization, the grid assignments are piecewise constant in the scale, making the output reconstruction error piecewise quadratic over finitely many intervals, each admitting a closed-form optimization. Building on this insight, we present PiSO (Piecewise Scale Optimization), an algorithm that leverages calibration data to efficiently select channel-wise scales to achieve globally optimal output reconstruction error to arbitrary accuracy. We extend PiSO to group-wise quantization via tractable objectives. We also propose strategies for integrating it with error-correction methods such as GPTQ and Qronos, which greedily adjust weight assignments to compensate for the rounding errors of previously quantized weights. Experiments on Llama and Qwen models across multiple sizes and bit-widths show consistent improvements in perplexity and zero-shot accuracy, both standalone and combined with error correction, with gains increasing as the bit-width narrows. For instance, on Llama-3, PiSO reduces the 2-bit perplexity of Qronos by up to 7x, and at 3 bits, PiSO without error correction outperforms GPTQ with absmax scales.