GRAFT-EEG: Gauge-Aware Physical Field Transport for Cross-Dataset Motor-Imagery EEG

Cross-subject motor-imagery electroencephalography (MI-EEG) decoding remains challenging because substantial inter-subject variability can cause both negative transfer from poorly matched source subjects and persistent distribution discrepancies between source and target domains. Existing multi-source domain adaptation methods often incorporate all available source domains or estimate source relevance using signal-level or task-specific representations, while distribution alignment is frequently performed only at the feature level. These limitations may introduce irrelevant source knowledge and fail to preserve class-discriminative structures across subjects. In this study, we propose a brain foundation model-guided multi-source domain adaptation framework (BFM-MSDA) for cross-subject MI-EEG decoding. The method first utilizes representations learned by a pretrained brain foundation model to estimate source--target compatibility and retrieve target-relevant sources. Subsequently, a relevance-weighted dual alignment strategy is applied to the selected sources and the unlabeled target domain. Specifically, Cauchy--Schwarz (CS) divergence is used to reduce discrepancies in marginal feature distributions, while conditional Cauchy--Schwarz (CCS) divergence further aligns class-dependent decision distributions. Source relevance is incorporated into both alignment terms so that more transferable source subjects contribute more strongly to adaptation. Experiments on two public MI-EEG benchmarks achieve average accuracies of 86.16% and 78.41%, outperforming representative cross-subject decoding and domain adaptation methods. Additional experiments with a large source pool further demonstrate that target-aware source retrieval improves scalability while mitigating negative transfer. These results highlight the importance of informed source selection under cross-subject distribution shift.

Classification of electroencephalogram (EEG) signals obtained during motor imagery (MI) has substantial application potential, including communication assistance and rehabilitation support for patients with motor impairments. These signals remain inherently susceptible to physiological artifacts (e.g., eye blinking and swallowing), which pose persistent challenges. Although Transformer-based approaches for classifying EEG signals have been widely adopted, they often struggle to capture fine-grained dependencies within them. To overcome these limitations, we propose Cortical-SSM, a novel architecture that extends deep state space models to capture integrated dependencies of EEG signals across temporal, spatial, and frequency domains. We validated our method across two large-scale public MI EEG datasets containing more than 50 subjects. Our method outperformed baseline methods on both benchmarks. Furthermore, visual explanations derived from our model indicate that it effectively captures neurophysiologically relevant regions of EEG signals. These results indicate that Cortical-SSM provides a robust and interpretable alternative to attention-based architectures for MI EEG decoding. By enabling physiologically grounded feature learning, our method advances the reliability of subject-independent EEG classification and supports the development of practical and clinically deployable brain-computer interface systems.

Motor imagery (MI) electroencephalography (EEG) decoding could support post-stroke rehabilitation, but models developed on healthy cohorts may not transfer reliably to pathological EEG. We evaluated whether Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) can efficiently adapt three pretrained EEG foundation models (i.e., LaBraM-base, REVE-base, and REVE-large) for binary left- versus right-hand MI decoding. Frozen-backbone head-only baselines and LoRA adaptation were evaluated using subject-wise five-fold cross-validation on the PhysioNet EEG Motor Movement/Imagery Dataset and a binary subset of the UET175 dataset comprising 30 stroke participants. On EEGMMIDB, LoRA increased accuracy to 0.822 for LaBraM-base and 0.957 for REVE-base. On UET175, all head-only models performed near chance. With LoRA, LaBraM-base remained near chance (0.499$\pm$0.009), whereas REVE-base reached 0.847$\pm$0.194 and outperformed REVE-large (0.806$\pm$0.178), indicating that increased model capacity alone did not improve stroke-domain adaptation. The strongest stroke configuration, REVE-base LoRA, was further evaluated using within-cohort leave-one-subject-out cross-validation (LOOCV), showing 0.952 mean accuracy, but subject-wise accuracy ranged from 0.586 to 1.000, revealing a small low-performing tail. Zero-shot transfer from EEGMMIDB to UET175 remained near chance (0.464$\pm$0.072). These findings show that healthy-benchmark performance does not ensure transfer to stroke EEG. Translation of EEG foundation models to pseudo-online or real-time rehabilitation BCIs should therefore include target-domain adaptation and subject-level assessment of temporal informativeness, spatial sensitivity, and physiological discriminability.