ProV-Mem: Proactive Memory for Streaming Video Question Answering
Authors: Bingbing Wang, Jing Li, Han Gao, Yishi Lin, Ruifeng Xu, Peng He
Organizations: Department of Computing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China · Research Institute for Generative AI, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China · Tencent Inc., China · Shenzhen Loop Area Institute, Shenzhen, China
Proactive streaming video question answering requires a model to continuously monitor an incoming stream and autonomously decide when to speak, what to say, and whether to emit a response. Existing streaming systems face a fundamental difficulty: retaining long visual histories is costly, whereas discarding them can lead to missed events and repeated responses. We propose ProV-Mem, a training-free proactive memory framework built around a frozen VLM backbone. ProV-Mem decomposes the proactive decision into three lightweight memory tiers: a temporal-trigger memory controls when to query the backbone and recovers from prolonged silence, an instructional memory guides what to say through a fixed prompting prior for concise and visually grounded generation, and an episodic memory determines whether to emit by filtering near-duplicate responses. Under an idealized conditional-sufficiency assumption, we derive a stagewise approximation bound relating the decomposed process to a full-state joint policy. We further introduce Cost-Aware Area Under the Curve (CAUC), which extends PAUC by explicitly discounting redundant, overly frequent, and unnecessarily long emissions. Experiments on the four scenarios of ProactiveVideoQA show that ProV-Mem achieves the best CAUC across all scenarios and the best PAUC on WEB, EGO, and TV, while maintaining low per-response inference latency.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Comparison of (a) existing methods and (b) our ProV-Mem method.
Figure 2: Framework of our ProV-Mem method.
System
PAUC ( ω=0.5 , ↑ )
CAUC ( ↑ )
Time (s) ↓
WEB
EGO
TV
VAD
WEB
EGO
TV
VAD
Offline Closed-Source VLMs
GLM-4.5V
40.60
50.28
31.99
36.57
29.29
38.16
28.22
30.96
45.28
Gemini-2.5-Pro
36.88
41.27
32.62
36.92
26.80
32.25
29.35
30.51
20.00
Gemini-2.5-Flash
40.15
42.11
28.81
35.98
29.31
33.23
26.46
30.16
17.20
GPT-4o-mini
38.03
33.48
27.83
35.28
28.46
29.72
26.37
30.75
21.52
Table 1: Main results on ProactiveVideoQA. Best results are in bold .
Variant
PAUC ( ω=0.5 , ↑ )
CAUC ( ↑ )
WEB
EGO
TV
VAD
WEB
EGO
TV
VAD
Full
57.90
70.87
57.43
32.10
40.59
38.20
40.22
31.68
−Mtrig
37.51
66.25
55.91
32.76
33.10
31.65
40.16
27.19
−Minst
45.06
58.93
55.03
31.08
34.92
35.34
39.14
27.20
−Mep
60.14
71.78
62.64
33.38
40.12
37.80
38.83
26.33
Table 2: Ablation study on ProactiveVideoQA.
Figure 3: Backbone scaling on ProactiveVideoQA with the ProV-Mem.
Figure 4: Effect of the similarity threshold η across ProactiveVideoQA scenarios.
Figure 5: Effect of the regular trigger stride K across all four ProactiveVideoQA scenarios.
Figure 6: Comparison of (a) MMDuet and (b) our ProV-Mem method.
Appendix figures & tables2 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
Figure 7: Sensitivity of ProV-Mem to the timeliness/correctness trade-off. Left: per-scenario PAUC across ω∈[0,1] . Right: four-scenario average PAUC and CAUC with the PAUC–CAUC gap shaded.
Figure 8: Left: effect of the suppression cooldown τsup on EGO. Right: effect of the silence-recovery threshold κ on TV. Highlighted columns are the defaults used throughout.
Despite the remarkable progress of Video Large Language Models (Video-LLMs), current online architectures still struggle to simultaneously process continuous video streams, decide autonomously when to respond, and preserve long-horizon contextual memory. These obstacles undermine real-time responsiveness and cause severe forgetting throughout prolonged interactions. In this work, we introduce LiveStarPro, a live streaming assistant that is designed for proactive video understanding over long-horizon streams. The design of LiveStarPro rests on three complementary components. The first component is Streaming Verification Decoding (SVeD), an inference framework that identifies the appropriate response timing through single-pass perplexity verification, thereby eliminating the dependency on explicit silence tokens. The second component is Streaming Causal Attention Masks (SCAM), a training strategy that enforces incremental video-language alignment over variable-length streams. The third component is Tree-Structured Hierarchical Memory (TSHM), a recursive memory architecture that organizes evicted historical information into event chains and consequently enables efficient retrieval from effectively unbounded video streams. To facilitate a comprehensive evaluation under realistic online conditions, we further present OmniStarPro, a large-scale benchmark that spans 15 diverse real-world scenarios and that extends to hour-scale streams for the assessment of long-term recall. Extensive experiments demonstrate that LiveStarPro consistently surpasses existing methods, attaining a 28.9% improvement in semantic correctness and an 18.2% reduction in timing error, while its streaming key-value cache further yields a 1.58x inference speedup over the same model without caching. The model and the code are publicly available at https://github.com/sotayang/LiveStarPro.
Streaming video LLMs must retain evidence before its relevance to future tasks is known and respond when sufficient evidence becomes available. The challenge is to form reusable factual memory without compromising real-time perception. We introduce OneStreamer, which jointly learns query-independent evidence recording and task response through a shared proactive generation process. Its Proactive Hierarchical Caption Memory (PHCM) produces time-grounded local-detail captions and summaries of completed events. Streaming caption targets supervise the interpretation of observed video prefixes during training. At inference, model-generated records complement a recent visual window, providing reusable factual context without revisiting historical visual features. Proactive State Transition Learning (PSTL) reduces the dominance of repeated waiting states by preserving supervision at all output anchors and selecting representative state-change and state-persistence tokens. We further develop a streaming data synthesis pipeline that aligns output content and timing with available evidence. Combining the resulting streaming captions and QA with cleaned open-source data yields OneStreamer-1M, a broad-coverage streaming video interaction dataset with over one million records spanning diverse tasks. Our 4B model achieves the best results among the compared methods across all eight evaluated streaming video understanding benchmarks. Ablations show that retaining generated captions improves historical QA without degrading real-time perception. PSTL also outperforms dense state supervision while supervising only 27.5% of annotated state tokens. Together, these results support proactive generation as a shared learning interface connecting perception, memory formation, and timely response in streaming video interaction.
Recent advances in Streaming Video Understanding has enabled a new interaction paradigm where models respond proactively to user queries. Current proactive VideoLLMs rely on per-frame triggering decision making, which suffers from an efficiency-accuracy dilemma. We propose Em-Garde, a novel framework that decouples semantic understanding from streaming perception. At query time, the Instruction-Guided Proposal Parser transforms user queries into structured, perceptually grounded visual proposals; during streaming, a Lightweight Proposal Matching Module performs efficient embedding-based matching to trigger responses. Experiments on StreamingBench and OVO-Bench demonstrate consistent improvements over prior models in proactive response accuracy and efficiency, validating an effective solution for proactive video understanding under strict computational constraints.
Yikai Zheng, Xin Ding, Yifan Yang +6
Institute for AI Industry Research (AIR), Tsinghua University · University of Science and Technology of China · 4Microsoft Research Asia +1