cs.LGOct 16, 2026

Budgeted Bayesian Bandits for Future Utilization

Authors: Sudipto Guha

Abstract

The multi-armed bandit problem models the trade-off between exploration and exploitation. In this paper, we study the variant where exploration has a hard budget and precedes exploitation. Prior guarantees include a 1/3 approximation by Guha and Munagala using Lagrangian duality, and a 4/27 approximation by Ma against a primal linear programming relaxation for a more general model. We show that the analyses of both algorithms are tight, even when their relaxations are asymptotically exact. We provide a different efficient algorithm that achieves a 0.43 approximation. We then provide an efficient algorithm whose guarantee approaches 1-e^{-1} approx 0.63 for bounded exchangeable reward observations in a non-vanishing regime, which is asymptotically tight against natural linear programming relaxations. The technique also gives certificates for stopping sequential model evaluation.

Figures & tables

Explore similar work

May 1, 2026

Trading off rewards and errors in multi-armed bandits

In multi-armed bandits, the most-explored arms are the most informative, while reward maximization typically pulls only the best arm. We study the tradeoff between identifying arm means accurately and accumulating reward, and present an algorithm with regret guarantees that interpolates between the two objectives. We provide both upper and lower bounds and validate empirically.
May 25, 2026

On the Benefits of Free Exploration for Regret Minimization in Multi-Armed Bandits

We study a stochastic multi-armed bandit problem where an agent is granted a free exploration budget before regret accumulates, a setting not captured by the classic regret minimization or pure exploration paradigms. The goal is to design an adaptive policy that strategically explores the bandit instance in the initial free exploration phase and minimizes the cumulative regret in the subsequent phase. We formalize this regret minimization with free exploration problem and identify an interesting regime where the free exploration budget scales logarithmically with the time horizon. To quantify the amount of regret saved with high probability as a result of the availability of the free exploration phase, we introduce a novel set of policies known as (α,β)(α,β)-probably saving policies. We propose a two-phase, probably saving algorithm, UFE-KLUCB-H, which consists of a principled free exploration policy, UFE, and a history-aware regret minimization policy KLUCB-H. Instance-dependent upper bounds on UFE-KLUCB-H are derived, showing that UFE-KLUCB-H accumulates strictly less regret than policies that do not have access to a free exploration phase. Complementarily, we derive instance-dependent lower bounds based on novel multi-instance perturbation arguments tailored to the free-exploration setting, demonstrating the near-optimality of UFE-KLUCB-H for two-valued bandits. Our upper and lower bounds reveal sharp phase transitions in the accumulated regret depending on the amount of available free exploration. Simulations are conducted to demonstrate that forced exploration and adaptivity in the algorithm lead to greater regret savings.
Oct 7, 2026

Expected Sample Complexity in Multi-Armed Bandits

Sample complexity is a widely used metric in sequential decision-making problems, defined as the number of suboptimal decisions during the interaction between the agent and an environment. We study the sample complexity of stochastic multi-armed bandit problems and introduce the expected sample complexity performance measure, analyzing it in a novel framework called approximately correct in expectation (ACE). We show that ACE guarantees imply almost sure convergence to the optimal expected reward, in contrast to high-probability guarantees found in other frameworks, and also show how to convert ACE guarantees into explicit expected regret bounds. We further show that, in contrast to existing measures, deterministic algorithms cannot obtain favorable ACE bounds, and analyze stochastic algorithms in two settings: when the allowed suboptimality level εε is known to the algorithm and when it is unknown. In the former, we devise an explore-then-εε-greedy algorithm, and in the latter, we analyze the expected sample complexity of Thompson sampling. Finally, we establish nearly matching lower bounds for both settings, showing that the algorithms are tight in εε and proving a performance separation between the two regimes.