Do Conversational Agents Need Explicit Memory? A Controlled Comparison with Raw-History Retrieval

LLM memory is widely used in long-term conversation understanding. Agentic memory systems often use mutation, structural organization, learned retrieval strategies, or other complex operations. Is this complexity always necessary? We study Raw-RAG, a naive RAG baseline using dense retrieval and reranking over raw history to supply evidence to a reader LLM. Across LoCoMo, LongMemEval, MEME, and MemoryAgentBench, Raw-RAG ranks first among the compared memory systems in six of seven benchmark-model settings, outperforming the strongest compared agentic memory system by 0.13-5.53 points. We investigate why raw-history retrieval remains competitive. Evidence analysis shows that its higher coverage of necessary evidence can offset lower utilization. Useful evidence includes both answer values and the relations and dependency paths needed to derive them. Even complete access to transformed memory stores leaves an accuracy gap relative to raw evidence, highlighting the importance of preserving raw information. These findings challenge the necessity of complex agentic memory for the evaluated conversation tasks and establish naive RAG as an essential baseline.

Agent-memory systems increasingly buy retrieval quality with structure, transforming raw conversation histories into summaries, embeddings, trees, or knowledge graphs before any question is asked. We ask how much of that benefit comes from the structure itself, rather than from competent retrieval over the raw history. We present ReFind, an agent-controlled search interface that builds no semantic structure at all: it leaves the conversation archive unmodified, indexes it lexically at turn granularity, and combines a generic iterative keyword-search loop with four chat-native controls grounded in empirical refinding work: session-aware rank fusion, local context expansion, temporal narrowing, and skipping already-inspected sessions. A separate reasoning stage answers from the collected evidence. Across a broad suite of conversational-memory tasks (single- and multi-hop QA, event ordering, and fact consolidation), roughly 2,800 questions on precise-retrieval and fact-tracking capabilities evaluated under the incremental multi-turn setting of MemoryAgentBench, ReFind attains the highest mean accuracy (58.2) of any system compared, above the strongest graph- and tree-based memory systems (HippoRAG 2, 53.2), all under a GPT-4o-mini backbone matched to every reused baseline. Controlled comparisons to single-shot BM25, a matched generic-agentic BM25 control, component removals, and agentic dense/hybrid variants separately support the roles of agent control, chat-native controls, and lexical retrieval. On LongMemEval-S/M, the same interface reaches 93.2 +/- 3.3 and 89.3 +/- 6.0 with GPT-5-mini. The results indicate that for precise, evidence-grounded questions over chat archives, much of the benefit credited to elaborate memory structures is recoverable by giving an agent controllable search over the unmodified record, with no LLM-based index construction at all.

Conversational AI agents commonly lack persistent memory across sessions. The obvious fixes like injecting full chat histories into the context window, or delegating to a third-party memory service, either exhaust the model's context budget or send personal data through infrastructure the user does not control. We describe a memory store that avoids both problems: an agent-local Neo4j property graph augmented with HNSW vector indexes and a full bitemporal data model. Each memory is stored as an immutable identity node linked to versioned content nodes carrying two closed-open time intervals: valid time (when the fact was true in the world) and transaction time (when the database recorded it). This design supports point-in-time semantic retrieval without physically overwriting history. Semantic edges between related memories are maintained automatically at write time using cosine similarity over 1024-dimensional embeddings. We evaluate the system on LongMemEval, a 500-question benchmark spanning six question types designed to stress long-term memory. Across 60 sampled questions, the current-state semantic search path achieves 46.7% R@10 overall, rising to 80% on knowledge-update questions. The time-travel path yields 80% R@10 on knowledge-update but decreases recall on temporal-reasoning questions (50% to 37.5%), a consequence of post-filter dilution that points directly to a concrete design improvement. We discuss what these results reveal about the limits of pure retrieval for different question types and what each failure mode suggests for future work.