Fine-Grained Units, Flat Decisions: Hierarchical Micro-Expert Pruning for Mixture-of-Experts Models
Organizations: Houmo AI · University of Science and Technology of China · Southeast University
Abstract
Micro-expert pruning reduces the capacity of mixture-of-experts (MoE) models by removing coupled channels within routed experts. However, finer pruning granularity alone does not guarantee the preservation of downstream capabilities, as similar language-modeling perplexity can accompany substantially different task performance. We revisit micro-expert mask construction as two distinct decisions: allocating retained capacity across experts and selecting channels within that capacity. We propose UC-RAMP, a two-stage post-training pruning framework that explicitly separates these decisions. CAPE uses cross-domain calibration evidence to redistribute expert widths under an exact layer-wise budget, while RAMP refines channel composition at fixed widths through one-out, one-in exchanges guided by a channel-interaction surrogate. Across three MoE models at 25% and 50% routed-expert channel pruning, UC-RAMP achieves the highest ten-task mean accuracy among evaluated pruning methods in five of six settings. At 50% pruning, it outperforms the strongest evaluated baseline by 8.19, 3.96, and 6.14 percentage points across the three models, respectively. In a single-A100 deployment at 25% pruning, UC-RAMP reduces measured time to first token by 19.7--23.9% and time per output token by 20.2--22.3% relative to the unpruned model. The code is available at https://github.com/xzktx003/UC_RAMP.
Figures & tables
| Qwen3-30B-A3B | Gemma-4-26B | Qwen3.6-35B-A3B | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Method | Unit | 25% | 50% | 25% | 50% | 25% | 50% |
| Dense | none | 86.19 | 86.19 | 90.15 | 90.15 | 76.94 | 76.94 |
| CAMERA | channel | 68.63 | 58.46 | 69.12 | 56.12 | 69.90 | 56.13 |
| MoE-Slimming | channel | 78.43 | 67.00 | 79.85 | 63.92 | 64.71 | 49.62 |
| AIMER | expert | 80.82 | 64.46 | 62.27 | 41.83 | 70.97 | 48.89 |
| REAP | expert | 79.29 | 66.30 | 79.74 | 27.92 | 69.37 | 65.41 |
| Model | CAPE | RAMP | Mean ACC (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3 | 73.11 | ||
| 75.19 | |||
| 75.43 | |||
| Gemma-4 | 65.51 | ||
| 67.60 | |||
| 67.88 |
| TTFT (ms) | TPOT (ms/token) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input | Batch | Dense | UC-RAMP | Dense | UC-RAMP |
| 256 | 1 | 106.61 | 81.71 | 47.45 | 36.94 |
| 512 | 1 | 107.92 | 82.14 | 47.54 | 36.92 |
| 1024 | 1 | 103.84 | 83.42 | 46.68 | 36.88 |
| 1024 | 2 | 131.38 | 102.79 | 48.48 | 38.70 |
| 1024 | 4 | 159.12 | 126.92 | 48.44 | 38.57 |
Appendix figures & tables3 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
| Method | PIQA | ARC-E | ARC-C | GSM8K | Hella | Wino | RACE | GPQA-D | MATH | HE | Mean |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dense | 93.42 | 94.95 | 95.39 | 96.66 | 79.43 | 85.40 | 92.56 | 72.73 | 94.00 | 96.95 | 90.15 |
| CAMERA | 90.70 | 94.91 | 95.31 | 94.24 | 78.38 | 81.77 | 91.87 | 43.43 | 20.60 | 0.00 | 69.12 |
| MoE-Slimming | 87.32 | 91.25 | 89.76 | 94.54 | 73.32 | 73.95 | 88.36 | 39.39 | 75.20 | 85.37 | 79.85 |
| AIMER | 83.24 | 84.13 | 82.59 | 62.47 | 73.64 | 76.95 | 91.57 | 22.73 | 36.20 | 9.15 | 62.27 |
| REAP | 88.47 | 94.23 | 92.06 | 95.91 | 81.51 | 71.43 | 90.78 | 60.10 | 89.40 | 33.54 | 79.74 |
| MAN | 65.02 | 87.46 | 86.77 | 43.21 | 55.84 | 55.88 | 75.36 | 54.04 | 85.20 | 90.85 | 69.96 |
| Method | PIQA | ARC-E | ARC-C | GSM8K | Hella | Wino | RACE | GPQA-D | MATH | HE | Mean |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dense | 94.34 | 94.15 | 93.86 | 86.50 | 90.44 | 91.32 | 89.60 | 20.20 | 24.80 | 84.15 | 76.94 |
| CAMERA | 95.16 | 94.78 | 95.48 | 87.19 | 91.17 | 92.82 | 92.70 | 16.67 | 31.20 | 1.83 | 69.90 |
| MoE-Slimming | 89.39 | 90.03 | 91.64 | 41.93 | 82.24 | 83.66 | 79.43 | 11.62 | 15.60 | 61.59 | 64.71 |
| AIMER | 91.95 | 90.78 | 90.61 | 73.16 | 82.70 | 88.24 | 84.99 | 11.62 | 29.20 | 66.46 | 70.97 |
| REAP | 94.67 | 92.72 | 94.20 | 75.44 | 90.76 | 91.08 | 89.68 | 12.12 | 27.40 | 25.61 | 69.37 |
| MAN | 94.67 | 92.72 | 93.94 | 73.77 | 90.55 | 88.63 | 90.82 | 15.66 | 24.40 | 77.44 | 74.26 |
| Model / ratio | CAPE | UC-RAMP | RAMP |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3, 25% | 82.81 | 82.81 | 0.00 |
| Gemma-4, 25% | 84.90 | 84.96 | +0.06 |
| Qwen3.6, 25% | 70.80 | 67.18 | -3.62 |
| Qwen3.6, 50% | 72.69 | 74.23 | +1.54 |