cs.ROOct 20, 2026

HATCH: Hardware-Attested Task Chains for Verifiable Manipulation

Authors: Shiza Charania

Organizations: Midas Robotics Inc., San Francisco, USA · University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada

Abstract

Capability claims in robot manipulation are unverifiable, and existing leaderboards are each closed, simulated, or gameable. We propose HATCH, a robot escape room: an openly specified, physically replicable, sensor-scored, and unrehearsable benchmark. Tasks span five skill categories at three difficulty levels and are chained so that the sensor confirming one task's completion unlocks the next, turning a room into a single long-horizon evaluation. Success is confirmed by instrumentation rather than human judgment, scoring is embodiment-agnostic, and object placements are randomized by a run-day seed. Entrants submit attested self-runs (uncut video, sensor logs, and the seed), with occasional organized events for calibration. Task specifications, build guide, bill of materials, and scoring rubrics are released under an open license.

Figures & tables

Explore similar work

Oct 26, 2026

RobotAgentBench: Towards Open-world Robot Autonomy

Recent advances in vision-language-action (VLA) and world-action models (WAMs) have significantly improved robotic manipulation, yet deploying robots in the open world demands a higher level of autonomy beyond executing predefined tasks. Robot agents offer a promising paradigm for this transition, integrating task discovery, contextual reasoning, physical execution, and adaptive recovery into a closed interaction loop. However, existing benchmarks largely evaluate isolated capabilities, failing to capture the complexity of open-world robot autonomy. We introduce RobotAgentBench (RAB), a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating robot agents in realistic, open-world household environments. Through an agent-assisted, human-in-the-loop real-to-sim pipeline, RAB constructs 50 diverse household layouts with interactive objects and physically grounded tasks, encompassing 90 atomic tasks, 18 short-horizon tasks, 8 long-horizon tasks, and 4 open-ended scenarios. RAB provides a multi-level evaluation of robot agent capabilities: (1) task-level assessments systematically examine five complementary dimensions: task discovery, context reasoning, manipulation, failure recovery, and robustness; (2) scenario-level evaluation assesses how agents integrate these capabilities to autonomously fulfill high-level user needs. Furthermore, RAB enables systematic comparisons of standalone VLA/WAM models and diverse robot agent architectures under a unified planning-execution-verification framework. Extensive experiments reveal substantial gaps between manipulation and autonomy, demonstrate the advantages of agentic architectures and recursive self-improvement, and highlight the remaining challenges toward open-world robot autonomy.
Jun 2, 2026

WorkBenchMark: A LEGO-Based Assembly Benchmark with an Assembly-by-Disassembly Baseline for the Smart Manufacturing League

We introduceWorkBenchMark, a LEGO Duplo-based robotic assembly benchmark motivated by the RoboCup Smart Manufacturing League. Robotic assembly couples low-level manipulation with task-level symbolic reasoning under physical constraints, a combination that current end-to-end learning methods do not yet solve reliably. The benchmark provides 400 tasks across four complexity tiers. We provide an open-vocabulary perception, Assembly-by-Disassembly baseline solution. Our planning-based pipeline outperforms a modern vision-language-action approach across all tiers. The benchmark, simulation environment, and baseline implementation will be released openly to support the broader robotic assembly community.
Apr 6, 2026

RoboPlayground: Democratizing Robotic Evaluation through Structured Physical Domains

Evaluation of robotic manipulation systems has largely relied on fixed benchmarks authored by a small number of experts, where task instances, constraints, and success criteria are predefined and difficult to extend. This paradigm limits who can shape evaluation and obscures how policies respond to user-authored variations in task intent, constraints, and notions of success. We argue that evaluating modern manipulation policies requires reframing evaluation as a language-driven process over structured physical domains. We present RoboPlayground, a framework that enables users to author executable manipulation tasks using natural language within a structured physical domain. Natural language instructions are compiled into reproducible task specifications with explicit asset definitions, initialization distributions, and success predicates. Each instruction defines a structured family of related tasks, enabling controlled semantic and behavioral variation while preserving executability and comparability. We instantiate RoboPlayground in a structured block manipulation domain and evaluate it along three axes. A user study shows that the language-driven interface is easier to use and imposes lower cognitive workload than programming-based and code-assist baselines. Evaluating learned policies on language-defined task families reveals generalization failures that are not apparent under fixed benchmark evaluations. Finally, we show that task diversity scales with contributor diversity rather than task count alone, enabling evaluation spaces to grow continuously through crowd-authored contributions. Project Page: https://roboplayground.github.io