TRCM: Topology-Aware Route-Consistency Modeling for Robust Neural Vehicle Routing

Latent recursion repeatedly processes internal representations through the same neural network. Recent work has shown this approach to be effective on structured reasoning tasks such as Sudoku and maze solving. However, whether latent recursion can support neural routing remains unclear. We introduce RELAGRAM (Recursive Latent Graph Model), a novel approach that brings latent recursion to graph combinatorial optimization. RELAGRAM encodes a capacitated vehicle routing problem (CVRP) instance as edge tokens; a compact transformer recurrently updates the latent representations of these tokens. An output head maps the answer state to an edge heatmap, from which an autoregressive decoder constructs a feasible solution. On CVRP-100 instances, the 0.53M-parameter RELAGRAM achieves gaps to a PyVRP reference of 13.4%, 9.8%, and 8.3% under greedy decoding, eightfold symmetry augmentation, and 256-candidate search, respectively. Trained only on CVRP-100, RELAGRAM generalizes zero-shot to CVRP-500 and CVRP-1000, achieving gaps of 15.6% and 21.7% under 256-candidate search. Together, these results demonstrate that latent recursion is a promising approach to neural routing.

The Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem (CVRP) underpins modern last-mile logistics, where routing decisions recur over the same fixed service area, like a city. In this setting, routing problems share a fixed set of potential customer locations, while active customers and demands vary between instances. We study how this spatial support can be exploited through reusable learned representations and design our method around three symmetries of the symmetric Euclidean CVRP: $E(2)$ transformations, vehicle-route permutations, and tour reversal. We introduce Neural Cluster-First--Route-Second (CFRS), a neural extension of the Fisher--Jaikumar framework that predicts seed-selection scores and customer-to-cluster assignment costs non-autoregressively and respects the three symmetries. A differentiable entropic optimal transport layer provides capacity-aware supervision and guides discrete capacitated assignment, followed by independent traveling salesman subproblems for route recovery. Component ablations show consistent benefits from learned seed selection, while learned assignment costs perform best near the training size and classical FJ costs perform better at larger sizes under exact decoding. On the fixed-support distribution with constant capacity, a model trained on $N=100$ achieves a $3.77\%$ routing gap relative to HGS at $N=1000$ without retraining. A shallow variant with one attention layer in each transformer achieves a $5.08\%$ gap at this scale, with spatial embeddings consistently improving routing quality over raw coordinates. Embedding interpolation further accommodates entirely unseen customer locations without retraining. On standard CVRP benchmarks, a separately trained model achieves a $2.73\%$ routing gap relative to LKH-3 at $N=100$.

Most neural constructive solvers for the vehicle routing problem (VRP) use route-by-route construction, extending one route until completion before starting the next. This commits route membership early and hinders global coordination across routes. We propose multi-component construction, which maintains many route components simultaneously and merges them in an arbitrary order. This removes the depot-return cue that route-by-route construction obtains from the remaining capacity; to compensate, we introduce an interpretation in which every component is treated as an implicitly depot-closed route. Under this depot-closed interpretation, every intermediate state of standard CVRP construction is a complete feasible solution, and the exact cost reduction of a merge is the Clarke-Wright saving. The neural policy combines this CW-saving signal with the evolving component state to learn what to connect and when to connect. A policy trained only on CVRP100 outperforms the reported results of representative neural solvers on CVRP100-500 with greedy inference and, reused for ruin-and-reconstruct, performs strongly at all evaluated sizes up to CVRP1000. In a zero-shot Constraint Tightness evaluation with capacities from $C=10$ to $500$, it outperforms the reported neural solvers at every capacity. Controlled analyses show that robustness persists without CW grounding and point to learned route-closing behavior as a plausible contributor to the tight-regime degradation of learned route-by-route solvers.