Organizations: College of Computer Science and Technology, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China. · College of Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China. · College of Science, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China. · Hunan Research Center of the Basic Discipline for Physical States, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China.
As cognitive radars evolve towards the end-to-end processing of one-dimensional complex baseband sequences, deep networks face severe adversarial threats. However, existing attacks encounter dual limitations in practical electronic warfare: low cross-architecture transferability and severe vulnerability to physical channel distortions, which degrades their tactical reliability. To overcome these bottlenecks, we propose a physical prior-driven Segmented Spatio-Temporal Attack (SSTA). First, a global-local feature decoupling segmentation mechanism interrupts the adversarial gradients' dependence on long-range sequence coherence, bridging the cross-architecture feature gap. Second, moving beyond static norm constraints devoid of physical semantics, we abstract channel distortions into differentiable spatio-temporal operators, integrating them into momentum iterations via an Expectation over Transformation (EoT) strategy. Comprehensive cross-evaluations across 9 heterogeneous models spanning CNNs, RNNs, and Transformers demonstrate that SSTA outperforms the state-of-the-art baseline by 10.36% in Average Black-Box Attack Success Rate. Furthermore, baseband equivalent simulations confirm that the generated waveforms survive extreme physical distortions and, after matched filtering, achieve zero main-lobe attenuation (0 dB) with noise floor lift strictly within Constant False Alarm Rate tolerances. SSTA successfully unifies digital-domain deception and physical-domain fidelity, providing crucial support for CEW security assessment.
Figures & tables
Fig. 1: The overall framework of Segmented Spatio-Temporal Attack.
Jamming Type
Key Parameter Range
Modulation Characteristics
DFTJ
False targets: 3–6, Delay: 1–10 μs
Multi-pulse linear time shifting
ISRJ
Retransmissions: 1–4, Sampling period: 5–20 μs
Periodic spectral notches
RDJ
Lag time: 1–10 μs
Constant frequency shift + time delay extension
SNJ
Duty cycle: 20%–50%, Delay: 1–5 μs
Intermittent sampled noise retransmission
SPJ
Bandwidth: 20–40 MHz
Narrowband spectrum dwelling
SWJ
Sweep period: 40–80 μs , Bandwidth: 20 MHz
Time-varying sloped sawtooth spectrum
TABLE I: Summary of Jamming Signals in the Simulation Dataset
Algorithm
ResNet18
DenseNet121
EfficientNet
SEResNet
DeepLSTM
DeepGRU
CNN-BiLSTM
SwinTrans
Conformer
Average BB-ASR
FGSM [ 40 ]
34.89
18.29
45.71
41.34
51.46
46.20
36.06
38.62
51.81
40.49
MI-FGSM [ 14 ]
47.79
24.50
39.04
55.62
50.19
49.86
32.58
33.24
59.64
43.61
VMI-FGSM [ 16 ]
63.80
62.44
44.69
63.98
61.01
66.39
43.56
32.60
71.40
56.65
DIM [ 17 ]
49.54
22.81
50.02
55.95
43.33
53.81
24.98
33.62
65.25
44.37
TIM [ 18 ]
28.59
13.78
31.52
31.48
30.39
28.48
27.57
38.59
42.58
30.33
SIA [ 19 ]
53.69
48.84
51.78
57.92
53.01
62.60
33.10
35.60
52.55
49.90
TABLE II: Comprehensive Black-Box Transfer Attack Success Rates (%) Across 9 Heterogeneous Models
Fig. 2: Heatmap of transfer attack success rates across the 9×9 cross-evaluation matrix.
Transfer Path
MI-FGSM
SIA
VMI-FGSM
SSTA
CNN → RNN
47.41
61.66
63.34
76.85
CNN → Trans
20.30
25.85
33.55
52.73
RNN → CNN
44.31
51.02
58.55
60.07
RNN → Trans
26.72
30.90
36.95
42.55
Trans → CNN
45.81
42.18
51.38
66.50
Trans → RNN
54.95
54.65
60.37
71.17
TABLE III: Transfer Attack Success Rates (%) Across Different Feature Extraction Mechanisms
Fig. 3: Radar chart of cross-architecture transfer attack success rates on six core paths.
Variant
AWB-ASR (%)
ABB-ASR (%)
Gap (%)
Baseline (MI-FGSM)
93.11
43.89
49.22
V1: Time-Only
86.00
52.07
33.93
V2: Space-Only
91.44
65.19
26.25
V3: Time+Phase
82.56
57.22
25.34
V4: Time+JNR
75.44
58.69
16.75
SSTA (Full)
85.00
67.46
17.54
TABLE IV: Performance Comparison of Different Ablation Variants
Fig. 4: Performance comparison trends of different ablation variants.
Fig. 5: Evolution curves of Average BB-ASR with respect to the iteration number K .
Segments ( N )
1
2
3
5
7
10
AWB-ASR
64.33
81.22
85.00
85.78
87.00
87.56
ABB-ASR
47.26
64.31
67.46
68.68
69.61
69.71
TABLE V: Attack Success Rates (%) Under Different Segmentation Counts N
Fig. 6: Evolution dynamics of transfer success rates across different architectural paths with respect to segmentation count N .
EoT Samplings ( T )
1
5
10
15
20
AWB-ASR (%)
77.67
82.00
85.00
84.33
85.44
ABB-ASR (%)
59.86
65.63
67.46
68.63
69.39
Total Time (s)
495.75
544.93
720.61
1158.04
1550.88
Avg Time (s)
0.55
0.61
0.80
1.29
1.72
TABLE VI: Performance and Overhead Under Different EoT Sampling Counts T
Fig. 7: Comprehensive evaluation of EoT sampling count T : (a) Boxplot of cross-model transfer rate variance; (b) Trade-off between worst-case transfer rate and time cost.
Fig. 8: t-SNE dimensionality reduction visualization of hidden feature manifolds under different cross-architecture transfer paths.
Fig. 9: Dynamic evolution trajectories of cross-model gradient cosine similarity during the iteration process.
Fig. 10: Effective ASR degradation curves under extreme physical distortions: clock drift, phase rotation, and AWGN channels.
Fig. 11: Normalized time-domain envelope comparison between the clean DFTJ signal and the SSTA adversarial example.
Deep neural networks have demonstrated excellent performance in SAR target detection tasks but remain susceptible to adversarial attacks. Existing SAR-specific attack methods can effectively deceive detectors; however, they often introduce noticeable perturbations and are largely confined to digital domain, neglecting physical implementation constrains for attacking SAR systems. In this paper, a novel Adversarial Attenuation Patch (AAP) method is proposed that employs energy-constrained optimization strategy coupled with an attenuation-based deployment framework to achieve a seamless balance between attack effectiveness and stealthiness. More importantly, AAP exhibits strong potential for physical realization by aligning with signal-level electronic jamming mechanisms. Experimental results show that AAP effectively degrades detection performance while preserving high imperceptibility, and shows favorable transferability across different models. This study provides a physical grounded perspective for adversarial attacks on SAR target detection systems and facilitates the design of more covert and practically deployable attack strategies. The source code is made available at https://github.com/boremycin/SAAP.
Yiming Zhang, Weibo Qin, Feng Wang
Key Laboratory for Information Science of Electromagnetic Waves (MoE), School of Information Science and Technology, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China
In this article, we propose an online electronic counter-countermeasure (ECCM) framework designed to conceal the strategic decision-making processes of a cognitive radar (CR) operating under adversarial surveillance. We model the CR under two distinct decision paradigms: a static constrained utility-maximizing behavior and a dynamic expected utility-maximizing behavior. The radar's utility function is modeled via a von Mises--Fisher (vMF) distribution, with the distributional parameter constituting the private information to be protected from adversarial inference. We adopt a distribution privacy framework to conceal this private information and provide formal distribution privacy guarantees for cognition masking. In this work, we develop cognition-hiding algorithms for both static constrained utility maximization (WDPCH-SU), and dynamic expected utility maximization (WDPCH-DU). Through rigorous mathematical analysis, we show that both WDPCH-SU and WDPCH-DU satisfy ε-distribution privacy (ε-DistP) against inference-based adversarial attacks and present the privacy--performance trade-off bounds, quantifying utility loss (in static setting) and expected utility deviation (in dynamic setting) as functions of ε. Numerical results show that WDPCH-SU gives about 15% improvement in utility loss at maximum privacy compared to the existing methodology while WDPCH-DU achieves a greater reduction in adversarial Fisher information without requiring explicit Fisher information constraints, at a moderate, analytically bounded utility deviation. These results are highly promising in many 6G communication scenarios such as network slicing for automated driving and swarm UAV coordination, where it is essential to keep the resource allocation policy robust against privacy attacks.
Sreedevi K, Nandhini K, Anup Aprem +1
Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering National Institute of Technology Calicut, India · Department of Electrical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, India
As a critical application of computational intelligence in remote sensing, deep learning-based synthetic aperture radar (SAR) image target recognition facilitates intelligent perception but typically relies on centralized training, where multi-source SAR data are uploaded to a single server, raising privacy and security concerns. Federated learning (FL) provides an emerging computational intelligence paradigm for SAR image target recognition, enabling cross-site collaboration while preserving local data privacy. However, FL confronts critical security risks, where malicious clients can exploit SAR's multiplicative speckle noise to conceal backdoor triggers, severely challenging the robustness of the computational intelligence model. To address this challenge, we propose NADAFD, a noise-aware and dynamically adaptive federated defense framework that integrates frequency-domain, spatial-domain, and client-behavior analyses to counter SAR-specific backdoor threats. Specifically, we introduce a frequency-domain collaborative inversion mechanism to expose cross-client spectral inconsistencies indicative of hidden backdoor triggers. We further design a noise-aware adversarial training strategy that embeds Γ-distributed speckle characteristics into mask-guided adversarial sample generation to enhance robustness against both backdoor attacks and SAR speckle noise. In addition, we present a dynamic health assessment module that tracks client update behaviors across training rounds and adaptively adjusts aggregation weights to mitigate evolving malicious contributions. Experiments on MSTAR and OpenSARShip datasets demonstrate that NADAFD achieves higher accuracy on clean test samples and a lower backdoor attack success rate on triggered inputs than existing federated backdoor defenses for SAR target recognition.
Yuchao Hou, Zixuan Zhang, Jie Wang +9
Shanxi Normal University, Taiyuan, China · Guizhou University, Guiyang, China · Shanxi Key Laboratory of Cryptography and Data Security, School of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, Shanxi Normal University, Taiyuan 030031, China +15