stat.MLOct 20, 2026

Near-Optimal Regret Bounds for UCB-Style Gaussian Process Bandits via Data Thinning

Authors: Shion Takeno, Shogo Iwazaki, Ichiro Takeuchi

Organizations: Nagoya University · MI-6 Ltd. · RIKEN AIP

Abstract

Gaussian process upper confidence bound (GP-UCB) has been widely studied, though its known regret upper bound is suboptimal. To obtain near-optimal regret upper bounds, existing studies mainly focus on non-adaptive methods, such as uncertainty sampling, whose practical effectiveness is often limited. This paper shows that, under a Gaussian noise assumption, UCB-style algorithms can achieve near-optimal regret upper bounds via data thinning, a statistical technique for creating independent datasets from a single dataset. First, we show that data thinning can yield tighter confidence intervals in the bandit setting, and that a direct extension of GP-UCB achieves a near-optimal simple regret upper bound. Furthermore, by leveraging the tighter confidence intervals and combining GP-UCB with a phased elimination algorithm, we show a near-optimal cumulative regret upper bound. Finally, we demonstrate the effectiveness of UCB-style algorithms incorporating data thinning via numerical experiments.

Figures & tables

Appendix figures & tables1 asset

Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.

Appendix

Explore similar work

Jun 2, 2025

Improved Regret Bounds for Gaussian Process Upper Confidence Bound in Bayesian Optimization

This paper addresses the Bayesian optimization problem (also referred to as the Bayesian setting of the Gaussian process bandit), where the learner seeks to minimize the regret under a function drawn from a known Gaussian process (GP). Under a Matérn kernel with a certain degree of smoothness, we show that the Gaussian process upper confidence bound (GP-UCB) algorithm achieves O~(T)\tilde{O}(\sqrt{T}) cumulative regret with high probability. Furthermore, our analysis yields O(Tln⁡2T)O(\sqrt{T \ln^2 T}) regret under a squared exponential kernel. These results fill the gap between the existing regret upper bound for GP-UCB and the best-known bound provided by Scarlett (2018). The key idea in our proof is to capture the concentration behavior of the input sequence realized by GP-UCB, enabling a more refined analysis of the GP's information gain.
Aug 17, 2026

Improved Regret Analysis for Parallel Gaussian Process Bandit Optimization

This paper studies the regret analysis for parallel Gaussian process (GP) bandit optimization. The known regret upper bounds for the widely used GP batched upper confidence bound and GP batched Thompson sampling (GP-BTS) suffer from a multiplicative factor with respect to the batch size QQ. To avoid this degradation, existing analyses require a polynomial number of uncertainty sampling (US) for QQ at the beginning of optimization. However, this initial US phase is often ineffective in practice. This paper shows that the regret upper bound without the multiplicative factor on QQ can be achieved without the initial US phase, using GP-BTS as an example. Furthermore, we show much better regret upper bounds in the noiseless setting than in the noisy setting, as in the sequential GP bandit setting.
Mar 10, 2026

On Regret Bounds of Thompson Sampling for Bayesian Optimization

We study a widely used Bayesian optimization method, Gaussian process Thompson sampling (GP-TS), under the assumption that the objective function is a sample path from a GP. Compared with the GP upper confidence bound (GP-UCB) with established high-probability and expected regret bounds, most analyses of GP-TS have been limited to expected regret. Moreover, whether the recent analyses of GP-UCB for the lenient regret and the improved cumulative regret upper bound can be applied to GP-TS remains unclear. To fill these gaps, this paper shows several regret bounds: (i) a regret lower bound for GP-TS, which implies that GP-TS suffers from a polynomial dependence on 1/δ1/δ with probability δδ, (ii) an upper bound of the second moment of cumulative regret, which directly suggests an improved regret upper bound on δδ, (iii) expected lenient regret upper bounds, and (iv) an improved cumulative regret upper bound on the time horizon TT. Along the way, we provide several useful lemmas, including a relaxation of the necessary condition from recent analysis to obtain improved regret upper bounds on TT.