Region-Specific EEG Classification of Hypnotic Susceptibility Using a Sliding-Window 2D CNN: A Subject-Independent Evaluation
Organizations: Department of Neuroinformatics and Biomedical Engineering, Institute of Computer Science, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University, Lublin, Poland
Abstract
We investigate whether a 2D Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) trained on minimally preprocessed EEG signals can classify hypnotic susceptibility across distinct brain regions. Sixty-two male participants (32 Control, 30 Guided Imagery / Hipno group) underwent a 20-minute EEG recording using a 256-channel EGI cap. A sliding-window approach evaluates all 10-second windows within the recording for each of seven predefined brain regions (prefrontal, frontal, temporal, central, parietal, occipital, and facial), yielding up to 868 independently trained models. Initial screening with a segment-level 90/10 random split showed that five regions exceeded the 0.67 accuracy threshold, with the occipital region achieving the highest mean accuracy (0.721) across 90.3% of windows. Subject-independent evaluation via Leave-One-Subject-Out (LOSO) cross-validation, however, substantially revised this picture: occipital performance collapsed to near-chance (mean ACC 0.453, AUC 0.429), revealing that high random-split accuracy was driven by subject-specific EEG fingerprints rather than genuine group differences. In contrast, the frontal and prefrontal regions maintained above-chance LOSO accuracy (0.646 and 0.624, respectively), demonstrating genuine generalisability. These results underscore the necessity of subject-independent validation in EEG-based classification studies and highlight anterior cortical regions as more reliable neural markers of hypnotic susceptibility.
Figures & tables
| Region | Electrodes ( ) |
|---|---|
| Prefrontal | 22 |
| Frontal | 20 |
| Temporal | 72 |
| Central | 25 |
| Parietal | 41 |
| Occipital | 40 |
| Region | Discriminative | Peak ACC | Mean ACC | Best window (s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Occipital | 112/124 (90.3%) | 0.803 | 0.721 | 771–781 |
| Parietal | 95/124 (76.6%) | 0.773 | 0.709 | 1121–1131 |
| Prefrontal | 24/124 (19.4%) | 0.822 | 0.709 | 1101–1111 |
| Central | 20/124 (16.1%) | 0.803 | 0.700 | 1101–1111 |
| Frontal | 13/124 (10.5%) | 0.783 | 0.711 | 1121–1131 |
| Temporal | 0/124 (0.0%) | — | — | — |
| Region | Mean ACC SD | F1 | AUC | Best window (s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frontal | 0.638 | 0.692 | 1121–1131 | |
| Parietal | 0.627 | 0.680 | 1121–1131 | |
| Prefrontal | 0.616 | 0.681 | 1101–1111 | |
| Central | 0.582 | 0.599 | 1101–1111 | |
| Occipital | 0.434 | 0.429 | 771–781 |
Classification
Classification maps observations to discrete labels, including familiar, unknown, hierarchical, or multiple categories.
See all 413 papers