EmoFI-TTS: Face-Conditioned Expressive Voice Synthesis with Intensity Modulation
Authors: Yejin Jeon, Luel Hagos Beyene, Marie Maltais, Hyounghun Kim, David Ifeoluwa Adelani
Organizations: Mila-Québec AI Institute · McGill University · NM-AIST · AIMS Research and Innovation Center · CSE & GSAI, POSTECH · Canada CIFAR AI Chair
Controlling emotional intensity remains challenging in expressive text-to-speech synthesis, particularly when emotion must be inferred without explicit labels. We propose EmoFI-TTS, a face-conditioned framework that derives emotion category and intensity from a single facial image while extracting speaker characteristics from reference audio. Modality-specific representations are fused to condition a pretrained speech synthesizer, with cross-speaker training encouraging separation of affect and vocal identity. An intensity-conditioned refinement module enhances the generated mel-spectrogram, while interpolation of learned intensity embeddings enables continuous control without additional training. On speaker-disjoint MEAD evaluation, EmoFI-TTS achieves on average 64.4% and 75.2% objective and subjective emotion intensity accuracies, while retaining low word error rate and high naturalness.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: System overview. Text, face image, and reference audio each control content, emotion and its intensity, and speaker timbre, respectively. Solid lines carry signal, blue dashed lines carry conditioning, and the orange arrow is the feature-matching loss against the real mel m⋆ , used only in training. At inference, the emotion intensity level is predicted from the face.
Model
WER
UTMOS
MOS
L1
L2
L3
L1-Sbj
L2-Sbj
L3-Sbj
Real (GT)
6.6
2.86
3.98 ± 0.20
69.7
34.6
80.3
88.7
81.2
87.6
EmoSpeech
9.3
2.88
2.96 ± 0.26
42.6
56.0
18.8
63.5
46.3
33.8
FaceTTS
16.3
2.46
2.65 ± 0.28
43.1
44.9
14.9
61.9
44.0
40.1
Ours
6.9
3.14
3.25 ± 0.26
76.4
42.8
74.1
82.2
69.5
73.9
Table 1: Results across objective and subjective ( Sbj ) metrics. MOS scores are reported with 95% confidence intervals.
Figure 2: Emotion visualizations of generated audio.
Figure 3: Continuous intensity adjustment from mild to strong emotion intensity. Dashed lines indicate real audio’s recall.
System
L1
L2
L3
Overall Acc.
Real audio
69.7
34.6
80.3
61.5
Backbone (no refinement)
79.3
42.1
48.9
56.7
+ refine., face-predicted
76.4
42.8
74.1
64.4
+ refine., oracle label
79.3
45.9
76.5
67.2
Table 2: Ablation of the intensity refinement module.
Fusion
Emo. Acc. ↑
Int. Acc ↑
WER ↓
Spk. Transfer ↑
cross-attn.
71.7
55.0
5.7
90.2
frame cross-attn.
61.6
48.3
8.1
50.2
sum
71.2
55.2
5.8
90.8
concat + linear
70.3
56.7
6.6
92.1
Table 3: Fusion ablation. Speaker transfer is reported in percentages. The adopted methodology is indicated in grey.
Large language model (LLM)-based text-to-speech (TTS) systems enable prompt-conditioned emotional control but struggle with fine-grained emotion intensity due to the semantic -- acoustic gap between text and speech. To address this challenge, we formulate emotion intensity control in LLM-based TTS as a learning-to-rank problem and propose Emo-LiPO, a listwise preference optimization framework that aligns prompt-conditioned speech generation with relative emotion intensity expressed in text. Emo-LiPO explicitly models global intensity ordering within each emotion under fixed transcripts, enabling more faithful and continuous emotional expression. We further construct ESD-plus, a multi-speaker dataset with explicit emotion intensity variations, to support fine-grained emotion modeling and evaluation. Experiments on ESD-plus demonstrate that Emo-LiPO significantly improves emotion accuracy and intensity controllability over both supervised- and DPO-based LLM TTS baselines, with particularly pronounced gains at high intensity levels.
Yihang Lin, Li Zhou, Congwei Cao +4
The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen · Shenzhen Loop Area Institute · Agency for Science, Technology and Research +2
Instruction-based controllable speech synthesis enables users to specify emotions through natural language. However, existing approaches often rely on coarse emotion labels and lack explicit modeling of fine-grained intensity. We propose EmoInstruct-TTS, a dual-path instruction-guided framework for emotional speech synthesis. We introduce Emotion2embed, a supervised semantic-acoustic emotion embedding covering 48 emotional states, including fine-grained categories and intensity levels. To infer embeddings from free-form instructions, we design an Instruction-Conditioned Emotion Flow Model (ICE-Flow) that generates acoustically grounded emotion representations. The inferred embeddings are integrated into an LLM-based synthesis pipeline to provide explicit emotional control while preserving semantic planning. Experiments show improved emotional controllability and speech naturalness over strong baselines.
Minghui Wu, Ganjun Liu, Zikun Fang +6
University of Science and Technology of China, China · iFLYTEK Research, China · Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., China
Pretrained text-to-speech (TTS) models can generate expressive speech, but reliable inference-time emotion control remains challenging: prompts and reference audio offer coarse, inconsistent control, whereas specialized conditioning and model adaptation require costly training. We present SteerSpeech, a lightweight activation-steering framework that controls emotion by injecting steering vectors into hidden activations. For each target emotion we train a lightweight low-rank transform, using a multi-expert objective that encourages monotonic emotion control while preserving speaker identity and linguistic content, constraining steering drift, and keeping the TTS backbone frozen. To optimize through discrete speech tokens, we introduce a two-pass generation-and-replay pipeline using a straight-through estimator to backpropagate expert supervision through sampled tokens. At inference, a target-emotion steering direction is optimized with its respective transform and injected into the base TTS model. Objective and subjective evaluations with Qwen3-TTS across seen, unseen, and accented speakers show stronger continuous emotion control with limited speaker and content degradation. SteerSpeech achieves 1.08x-7.12x baseline target-emotion scores and for a representative emotion subjectively, it receives 78.1%-96.8% intensity preference and 1.43x-1.46x speaker-identity preservation at high steering strengths.
Afsara Benazir, Darius Pétermann, Felix Xiaozhu Lin +1