Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) large language models reduce computation through sparse activation but still incur substantial storage costs. Mixed-precision post-training quantization (PTQ) reduces these costs by quantizing different model components at different bit widths, but existing methods often struggle to preserve generation quality under tight bit budgets. We identify two key challenges: (1) nonlinear quantization errors at extremely low precision are underestimated when cross-layer propagation is ignored; (2) direct router fine-tuning may cause routing drift, and calibration gains may not generalize to downstream tasks. To address these issues, we propose ProQuant, a weight-only PTQ framework for MoE models. Prune-or-Prioritize Mixed-Precision Allocation (PoP) jointly optimizes expert pruning and bit-width assignment. It allows higher-precision experts to substitute for severely degraded ones while improving bit-budget utilization. Routing-Consistent RMSNorm Finetune (RoCo) adapts expert input representations through mathematically equivalent transformations. It compensates for quantization errors to reduce routing drift. Extensive experiments demonstrate that ProQuant outperforms existing methods across diverse generative tasks. Code is available at https://github.com/ThrowBug/ProQuant.git.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Performance comparison of MoE mixed-precision quantization methods on Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 under 2.5-bit average expert quantization.
Figure 2: Relative hidden-state MSE at each decoder layer, measured against the corresponding full-precision model outputs. All experts in layer 0 are quantized to 1–4 bits, while those in other layers use 2 bits.
Figure 3: Overview of ProQuant, illustrating the workflows of (a) Prune-or-Prioritize Mixed-Precision Allocation (PoP) and (b) Routing-Consistent RMSNorm Finetune (RoCo).
Figure 4: Top-32 expert Jaccard similarity across MoE layers in Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507, comparing C4 with MATH-500 and GPQA-Diamond using activation-count and mean-routing-score rankings.
Figure 5: Architecture of RoCo. (a) Fine-tuning process and (b) parameter folding process. Superscripts i and p denote “in” and “post”, respectively.
Figure 6: Layer-wise Jaccard similarity between the full-precision and quantized models’ top-32 experts ranked by mean routing score on three datasets.
Model
Bits
Method
GSM8K
MATH-500
GPQA-D
IFEval
MMLU-R
BFCL-v3
AVG
Qwen3-30B-A3B- Instruct-2507
16.0
BF16
96.36
95.40
55.05
87.66
88.18
63.02
80.94
2.5
MxMoE
93.86
51.80
36.36
81.17
81.26
30.01
62.41
PMQ
95.45
39.80
30.81
82.33
79.56
29.82
59.63
GEMQ
93.93
45.60
31.31
82.66
81.56
30.22
60.88
ProQuant
95.53
93.20
53.03
87.19
85.44
56.31
78.45
2.0
GPTQ
91.28
76.00
36.36
81.17
81.75
45.29
68.64
Table 1: Performance of quantized Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 and Qwen3.5-35B-A3B on six generation-based benchmarks. We compare ProQuant with representative mixed-precision methods for MoE LLMs at varying average expert bit-widths. GPQA-D and MMLU-R denote GPQA-Diamond and MMLU-Redux, respectively.
Model
Bits
Method
Wiki. PPL ↓
C4 PPL ↓
PIQA ↑
ARC-E ↑
ARC-C ↑
HS ↑
WING ↑
AVG ↑
Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
16.0
BF16
7.26
12.49
80.09
83.88
62.37
79.72
73.40
75.89
2.0
GPTQ
9.83
15.45
78.29
80.18
56.83
73.70
71.74
72.15
MxMoE
9.23
13.97
79.54
79.21
55.20
77.84
72.30
72.82
PMQ
10.61
14.84
79.71
78.87
54.69
77.73
72.93
72.79
GEMQ
8.22
13.49
79.65
77.99
56.31
76.97
72.61
72.79
ProQuant
8.94
14.57
79.22
79.08
57.17
75.19
70.64
72.26
Table 2: Perplexity and 0-shot log-likelihood accuracy on Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507. Wiki., ARC-E, ARC-C, HS, and WING denote WikiText-2, ARC-Easy, ARC-Challenge, HellaSwag, and WinoGrande, respectively.
Candidate Bits
GSM8K
MATH-500
GPQA-D
IFEval
MMLU-R
BFCL-v3
AVG
{0,2,3}
94.47
90.20
45.96
84.47
79.82
52.05
74.49
{1,2,3}
93.33
85.80
36.87
80.96
71.40
42.40
68.46
{0,1,2,3}
93.93
85.40
36.36
77.88
69.44
38.87
66.98
Table 3: Ablation of candidate bit-width sets on Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 at a 2.0-bit average expert precision.
Method
GSM8K
MATH-500
GPQA-D
IFEval
MMLU-R
BFCL-v3
AVG
ProQuant
93.93
86.00
32.83
77.07
67.26
46.69
67.30
w/o RoCo
94.16
85.80
26.77
75.35
63.75
42.79
64.77
Direct RMSNorm FT
93.33
86.60
30.81
74.96
65.88
43.89
65.91
Table 4: Fine-tuning strategy ablation on Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 at a 1.5-bit average expert precision.
Model
Bits
ρ
GSM8K
MATH-500
GPQA-D
IFEval
MMLU-R
BFCL-v3
AVG
Qwen3-30B-A3B- Instruct-2507
2.0
0.10
95.00
88.00
48.99
82.10
82.56
49.71
74.39
0.15
94.69
88.20
42.93
84.21
81.30
52.66
74.00
0.20
95.22
87.80
44.44
84.92
80.12
51.67
74.03
0.25
95.45
91.80
46.46
82.57
79.49
54.38
75.03
0.30
94.24
90.60
45.45
83.97
79.00
51.04
74.05
Table 5: Sensitivity to ρ on Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 with 2.0-bit experts, without RoCo finetuning.
Appendix figures & tables1 asset
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
Figure 7: (a) Model size comparison of Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 and Qwen3.5-35B-A3B under different expert average bit-width settings. (b) End-to-end quantization time comparison of different methods on Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 under a 2.0-bit expert average bit-width setting.
Sparse Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) allows scaling of language and vision models efficiently by activating only a small subset of experts per input. While this reduces computation, the large number of parameters still incurs substantial memory overhead during inference. Post-training quantization has been explored to address this issue. Because uniform quantization suffers from significant accuracy loss at low bit-widths, mixed-precision methods have been recently explored; however, they often require substantial computation for bit-width allocation and overlook the varying sensitivity of model performance to the quantization of different experts. We propose a theoretically grounded expert-wise mixed precision strategy that assigns bit-width to each expert primarily based on their change in routers l2 norm during training. Experts with smaller changes are shown to capture less frequent but critical features, and model performance is more sensitive to the quantization of these experts, thus requiring higher precision. Furthermore, to avoid allocating experts to lower precision that inject high quantization noise, experts with large maximum intra-neuron variance are also allocated higher precision. Experiments on large-scale MoE models, including Switch Transformer and Mixtral, show that our method achieves higher accuracy than existing approaches, while also reducing inference cost and incurring only negligible overhead for bit-width assignment.
Mohammed Nowaz Rabbani Chowdhury, Kaoutar El Maghraoui, Hsinyu Tsai +4
Mixture-of-Experts Large Language Models (MoE-LLMs) achieve strong performance but incur substantial memory overhead due to massive expert parameters. Mixed-precision quantization mitigates this cost by allocating expert-wise bit-widths based on their importance, approaching the accuracy-memory Pareto frontier and enabling extreme low-bit quantization. However, existing methods rely on layer-wise importance estimation and overlook router shifts induced by quantization, resulting in suboptimal allocation and routing. In this work, we propose Global Expert-level Mixed-precision Quantization (GEMQ) to overcome these limitations via (1) a global linear-programming formulation that captures model-wide expert importance based on quantization error analysis, and (2) efficient router fine-tuning to adapt routing to quantized experts. These components are integrated into a progressive quantization framework that iteratively refines importance estimation and allocation. Experiments demonstrate that GEMQ significantly reduces memory and accelerates inference with minimal accuracy degradation. Source code is available at https://github.com/jndeng/GEMQ .
Jianing Deng, Song Wang, Dongwei Wang +4
University of Pittsburgh · University of Central Florida · University of Arizona +1
Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architectures scale model capacity through sparse expert activation, but their deployment remains memory-bound because all expert weights must reside in memory. Mixed-precision quantization can substantially reduce this footprint by assigning different bit-widths to different experts. Existing approaches, however, typically rely on calibration data to estimate expert importance and determine bit allocation. For frontier MoE LLMs, the original training data, and hence the true training distribution, is proprietary and inaccessible. As a result, calibration sets are inevitably imperfect surrogates, and this can misestimate expert utilization and lead to suboptimal bit allocation. Motivated by the substantial cross-expert quality variability observed in modern MoE models, and by the success of Heavy-Tailed Self-Regularization (HT-SR) theory at predicting neural network model quality without access to training or testing data, we propose AlphaQ, a calibration-free bit-allocation method for MoE quantization. AlphaQ draws on HT-SR theory and follows a simple principle: experts with more heavy-tailed weight spectra are typically better trained and hence should receive higher bit-widths, while experts with weaker heavy-tailed structure can be quantized more aggressively. AlphaQ operationalizes this principle by measuring expert-wise spectral heavy-tailedness and solving a budget-constrained optimization problem that minimizes total quantization error under a global bit-budget constraint. Across several MoE models, AlphaQ consistently outperforms calibration-based baselines under matched bit budgets. Notably, on Qwen1.5-MoE, AlphaQ achieves near full-precision accuracy with an average expert precision of only 3.5 bits, while delivering more than 4× memory compression. Our code is available at https://github.com/Superone77/AlphaQ.
Wanqi Yang, Yuexiao Ma, Alexander Conzelmann +4
Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems · ELLIS Institute Tübingen · Tübingen AI Center +5