cs.LGOct 22, 2026

QuaNAS: Uncertainty-Aware Reuse of Earlier Searches for Query-Efficient Neural Architecture Search

Authors: Brama Seta Putra Satria, Dwi Sunaryono, Misbakhul Munir Irfan Subakti, Irzal Ahmad Sabilla, Laras Suciningtyas

Organizations: Department of Informatics, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya, Indonesia · Department of Information Technology, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya, Indonesia · Department of Electrical Engineering, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya, Indonesia

Abstract

Neural architecture search (NAS) on a new dataset often affords only tens of short training runs, so what the search knows before its first evaluation decides its efficiency. Yet most NAS methods start from scratch, guided at best by zero-cost proxies that are unreliable across tasks. QuaNAS treats a library of earlier searches in the same search space as explicit knowledge of uncertain reliability. Main effects of design decisions learned from this library and, secondarily, zero-cost proxies become priors over candidate architectures without any label of the new dataset. A Gaussian process starts at the prior optimum and re-estimates after every evaluation how far each prior is trusted. Under a protocol frozen before any confirmation data were seen, QuaNAS was evaluated once on 12 new image, time-series, text and tabular datasets. It lowered anytime regret on the short-training objective 2.7- to 3.9-fold relative to five pre-specified NAS baselines that start from scratch (Holm-adjusted p = 0.0012 each). Its final models matched (non-inferiority margin 0.5 pp) or exceeded matched-recipe reference models on nine datasets, as did the prior optimum, selected without a single evaluation. Post-hoc comparisons with established transfer methods given the same library trace the gain to the library: without it, the same Gaussian process had over twice the regret. They also show where each transfer mechanism works best: the pooled main effects of QuaNAS for weakly transferable tabular tasks, per-task surrogates for image, time-series and text tasks and for small or mismatched libraries. Finally, the main effects make the transferred knowledge inspectable.

Figures & tables

Appendix figures & tables2 assets

Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.

Appendix

Explore similar work

Oct 23, 2026

Searching with Sparse Histories: Cross-Task Architecture Search from Incomplete Search Logs and Zero-Cost Proxies

Neural architecture search (NAS) is expensive, but cross-task transfer can reduce costs by reusing knowledge from previous tasks. However, existing methods struggle with sparse search histories and task-specific transfer failures. We propose a method, a risk-robust strategy that combines sparse source logs with zero-cost proxies through champion-based initialization and joint pairwise-ranker pretraining. On TransNAS-Bench-101, the proposal mitigates severe worst-case failures, reducing worst-10% ranks from 290 to 43 for Micro autoencoding and from 465 to 45 for Macro room layout. Across 13 cell-space targets, it outperforms a proxy-only ranker on 10 targets in both mean and worst-case performance, while maintaining competitive average performance.
Sep 12, 2026

ZAPS: Zero-Cost Active Proxy Search for Neural Architecture Search

Neural Architecture Search (NAS) automates network design, but evaluating a single candidate requires training it to convergence, making exhaustive search intractable. Zero-cost proxies estimate architecture quality at initialization in seconds, yet a single proxy is noisy, and combining several does not straightforwardly help: proxies are strongly correlated, so naive aggregation compounds their shared errors instead of averaging them out. Existing methods exploit either proxy signals or architectural topology - never both within a single active-learning framework. We introduce ZAPS (Zero-cost Active Proxy Search), a four-stage pipeline that closes this gap. ZAPS (i) selects a compact, non-redundant proxy subset offline via ProxyFit, a greedy anti-redundancy criterion; (ii) seeds the search with a hybrid K-means strategy that balances exploitation and exploration; (iii) re-selects proxies at every iteration by a bootstrapped vote as the labeled set grows; and (iv) ranks candidates with an XGBoost ensemble trained jointly on proxy ranks and one-hot topological encodings, queried through an Upper Confidence Bound (UCB) acquisition function. On NAS-Bench-201 under a budget of B=200 evaluations, ZAPS recovers 52.3% of the true top-100 architectures on CIFAR-10 and 65.8% on CIFAR-100, ahead of every baseline we consider - Random Search, Local Search, REA, BANANAS and TPE - and, on CIFAR-10, with less than half the run-to-run standard deviation of the strongest of them. The advantage is largest where evaluations are scarce: on NAS-Bench-201 it narrows as the budget grows, whereas on the harder NAS-Bench-101, which no method comes close to saturating, it widens instead. All methods are scored by a single criterion: how much of the true top-100 lies among the architectures they actually evaluated.
Oct 1, 2026

LESS: Lightweight Evolutionary Supernet Search in Minutes

Low-cost NAS must both explore high-performing architectures and identify them reliably, yet reducing evaluation cost often weakens the fidelity of candidate comparisons. Training-free methods reduce evaluation cost by replacing learned task feedback with proxy signals measured at initialization. We introduce LESS (Lightweight Evolutionary Supernet Search), a data-driven method that combines a brief fair hard-path warm-up with discrete search under a single CMA-ES distribution. Each proposal is evaluated as its decoded hard genotype after six candidate-conditioned supernet updates. On NAS-Bench-201, LESS achieves 93.189±0.467%93.189\pm0.467\% CIFAR-10 test accuracy in 409.1 seconds, coming within 0.04 percentage points of FairNAS using approximately 1/241/24 of its source-reported search time. Matched controls show that calibration improves selected validation accuracy by 0.5770.577 percentage points while changing best-visited accuracy by only 0.0540.054 points, indicating that its primary effect is to reduce selection regret. The frozen configuration transfers without tuning to CIFAR-100 and ImageNet16-120 with 69.615±1.139%69.615\pm1.139\% and 43.720±1.697%43.720\pm1.697\% accuracy. Applied without tuning to the larger DARTS space, LESS achieves 96.95±0.14%96.95\pm0.14\% on CIFAR-10 and 82.43±0.80%82.43\pm0.80\% on CIFAR-100, with each search completing in approximately 43.5 minutes on a single GPU. Together, these results show that short, balanced, data-dependent updates enable competitive neural architecture search across datasets and search spaces within minutes.