Recommender regret for improving regularised RL estimation with bandits and MCTS

Real-world contextual bandit problems with complex reward models are often tackled with iteratively trained models, such as boosting trees. However, it is difficult to directly apply simple and effective exploration strategies--such as Thompson Sampling or UCB--on top of those black-box estimators. Existing approaches rely on sophisticated assumptions or intractable procedures that are hard to verify and implement in practice. In this work, we explore the use of an exploration-free (pure-greedy) action selection strategy, that exploits the randomness inherent in model fitting process as an intrinsic source of exploration. More specifically, we note that the stochasticity in cross-validation based regularization process can naturally induce Thompson Sampling-like exploration. We show that this regularization-induced exploration is theoretically equivalent to Thompson Sampling in the two-armed bandit case and empirically leads to reliable exploration in large-scale business environments compared to benchmark methods such as epsilon-greedy and other state-of-the-art approaches. Overall, our work reveals how regularized estimator training itself can induce effective exploration, offering both theoretical insight and practical guidance for contextual bandit design.

Recent studies have shown that reinforcement learning with KL-regularized objectives can enjoy faster rates of convergence or logarithmic regret, in contrast to the classical $\sqrt{T}$-type regret in the unregularized setting. However, the statistical efficiency of online learning with respect to KL-regularized objectives remains far from completely characterized, even when specialized to multi-armed bandits (MABs). We address this problem for MABs via a sharp analysis of KL-UCB using a novel peeling argument, which yields a $\tilde{O}(ηK\log^2T)$ upper bound: the first high-probability regret bound with linear dependence on $K$. Here, $T$ is the time horizon, $K$ is the number of arms, $η^{-1}$ is the regularization intensity, and $\tilde{O}$ hides all logarithmic factors except those involving $\log T$. The near-tightness of our analysis is certified by the first non-constant lower bound $Ω(ηK \log T)$, which follows from subtle hard-instance constructions and a tailored decomposition of the Bayes prior. Moreover, in the low-regularization regime (i.e., large $η$), we show that the KL-regularized regret for MABs is $η$-independent and scales as $\tildeΘ(\sqrt{KT})$. Overall, our results provide a thorough understanding of KL-regularized MABs across all regimes of $η$ and yield nearly optimal bounds in terms of $K$, $η$, and $T$.

We study KL-regularized contextual bandits under both reward and preference feedback. While existing regret guarantees typically depend on the eluder dimension, we show that simple greedy sampling can achieve polylogarithmic regret without explicit dependence on this complexity measure. For reward feedback, we analyze a greedy algorithm that samples directly from the Gibbs policy induced by the estimated reward. We extend the result to preference feedback under both general preference and Bradley--Terry models, while also sharpening existing dimension-dependent guarantees. Our analysis reveals a trade-off between greedy sampling and upper confidence bound-style exploration: greedy sampling enjoys stronger regret guarantees when KL regularization is sufficiently strong, whereas additional exploration yields sharper bounds as the regularization weakens.