Learning to Look Beyond Screens: Transferable Visual Observation from GUI Grounding
Organizations: Wuhan University of Technology · Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) · Zhejiang University · Ant Group
Abstract
Visual perception is evolving from passive recognition toward active, task-oriented observation. We investigate GUI grounding as a scalable source of spatial supervision for learning observation behaviors that transfer beyond interfaces. We introduce LBS (Look Beyond Screens), a vision-language model trained through supervised initialization on teacher-generated GUI grounding trajectories, followed by reinforcement learning for multi-turn crop-and-inspect decisions. Under fixed inference settings, LBS models based on Qwen3.5-35B-A3B and Qwen3.8-27B consistently improve over their corresponding baselines. Gains beyond supervised fine-tuning transfer to PerceptionBench for both backbones and to HR-Bench and ChartQAPro for Qwen3.5-35B-A3B, supporting observation strategies that generalize beyond GUI-specific imitation. Further analysis suggests complementary roles for the two stages: SFT establishes visual inspection primitives, while RL improves their downstream effectiveness. These findings support GUI grounding as a practical supervision paradigm for transferable active visual perception and broader multimodal reasoning. Our code and model are publicly available at https://github.com/inclusionAI/UI-Venus/tree/LBS and https://huggingface.co/inclusionAI/LBS-27B, respectively.
Figures & tables
| Application group | ||||||||
| Model | Zoom | Dev. | Creat. | CAD | Sci. | Office | OS | Overall |
| Holo2-235B-A22B (Agentic) | ✗ | 74.6 | 72.1 | 80.5 | 79.9 | 85.2 | 83.2 | 78.5 |
| MAI-UI-32B (MVP) | ✓ | 79.3 | 69.5 | 76.6 | 76.0 | 91.3 | 75.5 | 77.5 |
| AdaZoom (Qwen3.5-397B refine) | ✓ | 75.3 | 72.4 | 72.4 | 74.0 | 93.5 | 76.5 | 76.8 |
| KV-Ground-GuiOwl-1.5 (Zoom In) | ✓ | 73.6 | 72.4 | 74.7 | 77.2 | 90.0 | 73.0 | 76.4 |
| MAI-UI-32B (Zoom In) | ✓ | 71.6 | 70.4 | 72.8 | 75.6 | 86.1 | 65.3 | 73.5 |
| Qwen3.5-35B-A3B | Qwen3.8-27B | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | Base | +SFT | +RL | Gain | Base | +SFT | +RL | Gain |
| Visual relation | 40.0 | 39.7 | 45.2 | +5.5 | 53.9 | 59.70 | 68.48 | +8.78 |
| Counting | 41.3 | 42.5 | 48.8 | +6.3 | 48.5 | 53.94 | 61.82 | +7.88 |
| Attribute | 40.3 | 47.3 | 48.5 | +1.2 | 50.6 | 55.45 | 65.76 | +10.31 |
| Depth / 3D perception | 33.1 | 37.6 | 37.6 | 0.0 | 39.7 | 50.91 | 50.30 | -0.61 |
| Localization | 37.0 | 51.3 | 50.0 | -1.3 | 48.5 | 65.45 | 67.58 | +2.13 |
| Reward components | Accuracy (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Configuration | Process | Bonus | Critic | SSPro | PB |
| Outcome-only RL | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | 79.19 | 40.87 |
| Ungated process + critic | Ungated | ✗ | ✓ | 81.09 | 42.83 |
| Ungated process + bonus | Ungated | ✓ | ✗ | 79.57 | 42.10 |
| Gated process | Gated | ✗ | ✗ | 79.25 | 41.63 |
| Gated process + bonus | Gated | ✓ | ✗ | 79.70 | 43.26 |
| Condition | ScreenSpot- Pro | Perception- Bench |
|---|---|---|
| Direct reasoning (base) | 63.4 | 46.6 |
| Crop images without upsampling | 68.8 | 52.2 |
| Crop metadata only | 70.6 | 49.9 |
| Crop images with upsampling | 81.15 | 59.67 |
Appendix figures & tables3 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
| Capability | GPT-5.6- Sol | Kimi K3 | Claude- Fable-5 | Gemini- 3.1-Pro | GPT-5.5 | Seed- 2.1-Pro | Gemini- 3.5-Flash | Qwen 3.7-Plus |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VRel | 69.7 | 68.2 | 58.5 | 58.8 | 61.9 | 57.6 | 53.6 | 59.1 |
| Count | 62.4 | 59.7 | 52.9 | 56.9 | 55.8 | 51.2 | 43.6 | 53.3 |
| Attr | 62.1 | 59.4 | 60.9 | 61.8 | 60.9 | 58.2 | 54.5 | 55.8 |
| Depth | 55.5 | 52.4 | 51.5 | 50.0 | 48.8 | 43.6 | 49.7 | 48.5 |
| Loc | 76.7 | 70.3 | 70.4 | 52.7 | 65.8 | 50.0 | 50.6 | 52.7 |
| Comp | 67.0 | 59.1 | 56.1 | 61.7 | 65.6 | 59.5 | 54.8 | 55.9 |
Active Visual Perception
Active visual perception studies how agents choose where, when, and how to look to gather task-relevant evidence efficiently.
See all 49 papers