ExplainCC: Explaining Correlated Clusters by Node Labels

Chromatic Correlation Clustering (CCC) extends Correlation Clustering by assigning semantic colors to edges and requiring each cluster to receive a single color label. Unlike standard CC, whose LP relaxation has integrality gap 2 on complete graphs and admits a 2.06-approximation, the analogous LP for CCC has a strict lower bound of 2.11, and the best known LP-rounding algorithm achieves 2.15. We explain this gap by isolating the source of difficulty: cross-edge chromatic interference. Neutral edges, whose color does not match the candidate cluster color, create an irreducible cost absent from standard CC and force any color-independent rounding scheme to pay an additional mismatch penalty. We make four contributions. First, we prove a Global Integrality Gap Decomposition Theorem showing that the gap of any color-independent CCC rounding algorithm equals the standard CC gap plus an irreducible chromatic penalty Delta(L) > 0. Second, we solve the associated min-max problem and derive the staircase formula Delta(L) = ((L-1)/L) Delta_infinity, where Delta_infinity is approximately 0.0734. In particular, the two-color gap is 2.0967, separating CCC from standard CC already at L = 2. Third, we introduce Color-Coupled Correlation Clustering (C4). Adding the valid global constraint sum_c x_uv^c >= L-1 and a correlated interval-packing rounding scheme makes neutral edges behave like classical negative edges, recovering the optimal 2.06 approximation and bypassing the 2.11 lower bound for the uncoupled LP. Fourth, experiments on extremal instances, real multi-relational networks, and fairness benchmarks validate the theory: empirical LP gaps follow the predicted staircase, and C4 matches the unconstrained approximation ratio under fairness constraints.

Correlation Clustering (CC) is a natural formulation of clustering in combinatorial optimization, which uses a graph representation of the input and does not require a pre-specified number of clusters. Given $n$ objects and a pairwise similarity function, the goal is to cluster the objects so that similar objects are put in the same cluster and dissimilar objects are put in different clusters. Despite its versatility, existing CC algorithms suffer from significant scalability issues and are inherently transductive: i.e., the algorithm must be executed from scratch for any new problem instance. In this work, we bridge this gap by leveraging Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) to solve Inductive Correlation Clustering, a novel generalization of the CC problem designed to handle unseen graph instances. By learning to exploit common structural patterns and node features during training, our framework generalizes to new graphs drawn from the same distribution with minimal computational overhead with respect to standard algorithms. We demonstrate the effectiveness and scalability of our approach through extensive experiments. Our framework not only excels in the inductive setting, e.g., lowering the inference time up to $5$ order of magnitude, while maintaining an approximation ratio within $~10\%$ of the best baseline solution, but also achieves competitive results on standard (transductive) CC benchmarks. Finally, we showcase a practical application of our framework as a learnable pooling mechanism for graph classification. Our results indicate that our method serves as an efficient pooling layer, enhancing the ability of GNNs to capture hierarchical structural information in networks.

Correlation clustering is a fundamental unsupervised learning problem. On complete graphs, both the min-disagreement and min-max objectives admit constant-factor approximations, yet on general (non-complete) graphs, the best guarantees blow up to $O(\log n)$ and $O(\sqrt{n})$. This gap between the two regimes motivates the following question: are there classes of incomplete graphs that circumvent the lower bounds on general graphs and admit approximation guarantees approaching those attainable on complete graphs? We study a natural class of graphs obtained by randomly subsampling a complete signed graph $G$, where each edge is independently deleted with probability $q$. For such graph instances both for the min-max and the min-disagreement objectives, we prove approximation guarantees (depending on $q$) that are substantially better than the bounds achievable for general graphs. We supplement our theoretical results with experiments that also suggest that the approximation ratios of our algorithm are close to those of the complete graph and better than the worst-case bounds for general (non-complete) graphs.