Gaussian Distillation of Flow Policies

Generative flow and diffusion models provide the continuous, multimodal action distributions needed for high-precision robotic policies. However, their reliance on iterative sampling introduces severe inference latency, degrading control frequency and harming performance in time-sensitive manipulation. To address this problem, we propose the One-Step Flow Policy (OFP), a from-scratch self-distillation framework for high-fidelity, single-step action generation without a pre-trained teacher. OFP unifies a self-consistency loss to enforce coherent transport across time intervals, and a self-guided regularization to sharpen predictions toward high-density expert modes. In addition, a warm-start mechanism leverages temporal action correlations to minimize the generative transport distance. Evaluations across 56 diverse simulated manipulation tasks demonstrate that a one-step OFP achieves state-of-the-art results, outperforming 100-step diffusion and flow policies while accelerating action generation by over $100\times$. We further integrate OFP into the $π_{0.5}$ model on RoboTwin 2.0, where one-step OFP surpasses the original 10-step policy. These results establish OFP as a practical, scalable solution for highly accurate and low-latency robot control.

Though modern AI models like LLMs predict discrete tokens, today's robotic foundation models represent actions as continuous vectors. In this paper, we challenge this common consensus by asking if continuous action parametrizations are superior to their discrete counterparts. We conduct an extensive comparison of single-step regression and multi-step flow variants of both continuous and discrete policies in both from-scratch single-task and multi-task VLA training, in both simulation and on real hardware. In all regimes, we find that discrete action prediction, even the most naive, uniform-bin quantization, can match or even outperform continuous-action policies in task success rate. Moreover, we find that the challenge to discrete action policies is not action precision, but rather factorization error introduced by product-distribution predictions across time and action dimensions. We show that, when paired with the correct interventions (iterative computation through discrete flows, or distribution sharpening through classifier-free guidance), discrete flow policies can turn this weakness into a strength, enabling more responsive action changes during a predicted action chunk. Lastly, we show that attempts to explicitly inject geometric information into discrete policies, e.g. through corruption processes that emulate continuous flow matching, do not yield consistent improvements. Taken together, our findings question existing assumptions that robotic action prediction requires distinct design decisions compared to other AI domains, and motivate the possibility of discrete action prediction as a compelling alternative to today's continuous action parametrizations. Project page: https://iscoyizj.github.io/discrete-action-website/

Flow matching is a common generative recipe for robot foundation models. Vision-language-action models (VLAs) generate action chunks, while world-action models (WAMs) additionally generate future visual states. Both start generation from a fixed Gaussian prior, despite temporal continuity between past and future states and actions. This requires costly training and iterative sampling, especially for WAMs with an additional visual branch. We introduce $Δ$-flow, which constructs the source from recent history with mild noise rather than from a fixed Gaussian prior. This moves the source closer to the target, reducing transport to a small residual $Δ$ that can be learned efficiently and enables single-step inference. We integrate $Δ$-flow into the VLA policy $π_{0.5}$ and the WAM policies ImageWAM and Fast-WAM. On LIBERO, ImageWAM reaches 90% success in one epoch rather than six, and Fast-WAM reaches 95% in two epochs rather than eight. With LoRA fine-tuning, $π_{0.5}$ exceeds its baseline's five-epoch performance after one epoch. Single-step inference gives $1.54\times$, $2.49\times$, and $4.45\times$ speedups on $π_{0.5}$, ImageWAM, and Fast-WAM, respectively. It preserves action smoothness, achieving a $4.5\times$ reduction in action jerk compared with one-step Gaussian sampling. $Δ$-flow reaches state-of-the-art generalization performance on LIBERO-Plus. Action-history sources can be applied to pretrained WAM policies without retraining. Replacing the Gaussian action source at inference largely preserves task success with a single sampling step and can slightly improve it. We further study how action representation and visual information in action learning affect history-to-future prediction in $Δ$-flow. These results show that $Δ$-flow is simple yet effective, improving the efficiency and generalization of robot foundation models.