Diffusion-based vision-language-action (VLA) models cascade pretrained vision-language models (VLMs) with diffusion action experts, but typically restrict the VLM to providing static conditioning. This separation limits how much pretrained perception and reasoning can guide action generation, especially in out-of-distribution settings. We introduce JADE, a Joint Action DEnoiser that enables the VLM and action expert to jointly refine actions. Our key insight is that structured action latents allow the VLM to read the current noisy action together with visual observations and language instructions. At every denoising step, the VLM contextualizes the noisy action and guides the action expert through gated cross-attention, so that its guidance evolves with the action being generated. We further supervise the VLM to recover clean action latents from noisy ones, which gives it a direct action-learning signal and couples perception with control. Additionally, joint denoising enables JADE to generate actions with fewer sampling steps, helping offset the additional cost of VLM participation. An adaptive step-size schedule further balances task performance and inference latency. On RoboDojo, JADE achieves an average success rate of 12.67%, the highest among the evaluated π0.5-based methods, and is competitive with recent VLA and WAM foundation models pretrained at scale. It also improves performance on RoboTwin 2.0 and raises the average success rate across four real-world bimanual tasks by 20.8 percentage points compared with π0.5.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Illustration of the key difference between our proposed JADE and conventional VLA models. (a) During training, a frozen OAT encoder ( Liu et al., 2026a ) in JADE provides noisy action latents as VLM inputs and clean action latents as training targets. (b) During inference, JADE brings the VLM into the denoising loop, so its guidance to the action expert is updated with the current action at every step.
Figure 2: Architecture of JADE. A frozen OAT encoder maps the current noisy action to compact latents, which the VLM processes together with the observation prefix. The resulting register features guide each denoising block of the action expert through gated cross-attention, and during training the final features are aligned with the clean action latents.
Figure 3: Adaptive inference for joint denoising. The left panel shows uniform Euler steps, which native π0.5 and default JADE both use. The right panel shows the adaptive schedule, where a small ci gives a large step and a large ci gives a small step. Trajectories are schematic.
Method
Clean
Random
Avg.
ACT ( Zhao et al., 2023 )
29.7
1.7
15.7
RDT ( Liu et al., 2025 )
34.5
13.7
24.1
π0 ( Black et al., 2024 )
46.4
16.3
31.4
GR00T-N1.7 ( Bjorck et al., 2025 )
43.6
20.7
32.2
StarVLA ( Community, 2026 )
58.1
10.6
34.4
FastWAM ( Yuan et al., 2026 )
70.2
1.2
35.7
Table 1: Results on the RoboTwin 2.0 benchmark. Success rates (%) are averaged over 50 tasks under Clean and Random settings; Avg. is their mean. JADE uses 10 denoising steps. Best values in each column are bold.
Method
Gen.
Prec.
Long.
Mem.
Open
Avg.
OpenVLA-OFT ( Kim et al., 2025 )
0.04 / 0.00
0.20 / 0.00
0.70 / 0.00
0.00 / 0.00
0.08 / 0.08
0.21 / 0.02
RDT-1B ( Liu et al., 2025 )
0.56 / 0.33
0.38 / 0.00
1.13 / 0.00
0.49 / 0.33
0.00 / 0.00
0.51 / 0.13
GR00T-N1.7 ( Bjorck et al., 2025 )
2.16 / 1.22
2.54 / 0.67
8.30 / 3.58
1.06 / 0.89
0.18 / 0.17
2.85 / 1.31
π0 ( Black et al., 2024 )
3.94 / 2.56
3.56 / 0.75
6.19 / 2.00
3.47 / 2.11
0.25 / 0.25
3.48 / 1.53
Fast-WAM ( Yuan et al., 2026 )
2.34 / 1.11
1.96 / 0.00
9.14 / 5.17
3.55 / 3.44
0.42 / 0.42
3.48 / 2.03
LingBot-VLA ( Wu et al., 2026 )
6.71 / 4.28
5.33 / 1.83
10.89 / 5.25
3.82 / 2.78
0.72 / 0.67
5.50 / 2.96
Table 2: Results on the RoboDojo benchmark. Each entry reports Score / Success Rate (SR, %) . JADE uses 10 denoising steps.
RoboTwin
RoboDojo
Conditioning
λalign
Clean
Random
Avg.
SR
Score
Queries
0
73.1
49.5
61.3
7.68
11.33
Queries
0.1
72.6
45.3
59.0
9.66
15.36
Action latents
0
79.1
52.9
66.0
11.15
16.59
Action latents
0.1
79.3
54.4
66.9
12.67
18.29
Table 3: Ablation studies. We examine (a) action conditioning and auxiliary alignment supervision, (b) action representations, and (c) step-wise action-conditioned semantic updates. RoboTwin reports success rates (%); RoboDojo in (a) reports SR and Score averaged over its five evaluation dimensions, while (c) reports Score and full-task success rate on RoboDojo.
Figure 4: Sampling efficiency of JADE. The left panel shows the success rates of JADE and native π0.5 across different numbers of function evaluations (NFE) on fixed task subsets, and purple diamonds mark JADE Balanced. The right table reports three sampling configurations on the full benchmarks, with NFE averaged per action chunk.
Figure 5: Real-robot task illustrations and success-rate comparisons. Panels (a)–(d) show the four tasks, and panel (e) compares JADE with π0.5 .
Appendix figures & tables4 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
Figure 6: Experimental setup of the dual-arm robotic platform.
Task
Clean
Random
Task
Clean
Random
adjust bottle
100
89
place can basket
80
30
beat block hammer
90
34
place cans plasticbox
86
82
blocks ranking rgb
85
53
place container plate
95
91
blocks ranking size
43
24
place dual shoes
72
53
click alarmclock
88
76
place empty cup
93
91
click bell
95
90
place fan
73
40
Appendix
Table 4: Per-task success rates (%) of JADE on RoboTwin 2.0 with ten denoising steps. Each entry is computed over 100 trials. The last row averages all 50 tasks.
Task
Score
SR
Task
Score
SR
Generalization
Long-Horizon
stack bowls
54.60
48.00
put bottles into dustbin
96.70
94.67
push T
0.00
0.00
fill pen holder
41.90
16.67
pack objects into box
29.93
7.33
classify objects
43.63
33.33
fold clothes
59.07
54.67
play tic tac toe
15.10
2.00
hang mugs
9.40
0.67
fill egg holder
6.50
0.00
Appendix
Table 5: Per-task Score and success rate (SR, %) of JADE on RoboDojo with ten denoising steps. Each task includes 150 trials. The last row averages the five category means.
Setting
RoboTwin
RoboDojo
Training demonstrations
2,500
3,500
Optimizer updates
20,000
60,000
Global batch size
256
256
Hardware
8× A800 80GB
Precision / sharding
BF16 / FSDP
Optimizer
AdamW, (β1,β2)=(0.9,0.95)
Appendix
Table 6: Training configuration for JADE on the simulation benchmarks.
Test-time sampling can improve Vision-Language-Action (VLA) policies, but only if the model can efficiently select a good action from multiple candidates. Prior work often relies on separately trained external verifiers, adding extra models and inference overhead. We propose Token Probability Bucketing (TokenPB), a self-verification approach that discretizes continuous action chunks into bucket tokens and co-trains a single VLA checkpoint with a joint objective: a flow-matching loss for action generation and an auxiliary bucket loss Lbucket that teaches the VLM backbone to model observation-conditioned distributions over bucket-token sequences. At inference, TokenPB samples M candidates, scores each via teacher-forced evaluation under the learned distribution, and selects the best---enabling efficient batched scoring with observation-prefix KV-cache reuse. We provide theory connecting the training objective to a monotonic ranking property and bounds on expected selection regret that separate candidate-set effects from calibration. Across multiple backbones and benchmarks, TokenPB yields consistent success-rate improvements over single-sample inference from the same checkpoint (+2.7 in simulation, +17.1 in real-world, +16.4 under out-of-distribution shifts), and further improves over external-verifier baselines under the same sampling budget. The code is publicly available at https://github.com/RUCKBReasoning/TokenPB.
Chen Zhao, Zhuoran Wang, Haoyang Li +6
School of Information, Renmin University of China · Key Laboratory of Data Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, Beijing, China · Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications +1
Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models have established a powerful paradigm for generalist robotic manipulation by grounding control into the semantic reasoning of VLMs. Prevailing architectures typically model actions continuously via diffusion or flow processes, or discretely through either autoregressive generation or parallel decoding. Recently, Discrete Diffusion VLAs (dVLAs) have emerged as a distinct alternative, unifying vision, language, and action into a single discrete token space via masked generative modeling. While combining iterative refinement with unified representations, its training has thus far been restricted to Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), leaving the potential of Reinforcement Learning (RL) for further policy refinement largely unexplored. A fundamental challenge in RL for dVLAs is that the marginal probability of the final action generated by dVLAs remains intractable. To solve this problem, we propose dVLA-RL, shifting the learning objective from the marginal action probability to the joint probability of the sampled generation path. Specifically, by modeling the denoising process as a Markov Decision Process (MDP), we mathematically formulate this path probability as a product of step-wise transitions. This trajectory-level objective provides a unified formulation that natively accommodates variable denoising steps. Leveraging this intrinsic fexibility, we introduce a unified step scheduling approach for complex multi-task learning, tailoring denoising steps to specific task complexities to maximize both success rates and computational effciency. Extensive evaluations demonstrate that our approach achieves a success rate of 99.7% on LIBERO. Furthermore, it establishes strong VLA-based results on RoboTwin 2.0 by delivering a 30.6% improvement over the SFT baseline, remaining competitive with strong World-Action Model baselines.
Yuhao Wu, Yitian Liu, Weijie Shen +13
ScaleLab at SJTU · 1Shanghai Jiao Tong University · 3Baidu AI Cloud +3
We propose a standalone autoregressive (AR) Action Expert that generates actions as a continuous causal sequence while conditioning on refreshable vision-language prefixes. In contrast to existing Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models and diffusion policies that reset temporal context with each new observation and predict actions reactively, our Action Expert maintains its own history through a long-lived memory and is inherently context-aware. This structure addresses the frequency mismatch between fast control and slow reasoning, enabling efficient independent pretraining of kinematic syntax and modular integration with heavy perception backbones, naturally ensuring spatio-temporally consistent action generation across frames. To synchronize these asynchronous hybrid V-L-A modalities, we utilize a re-anchoring mechanism that mathematically accounts for perception staleness during both training and inference. Experiments on simulated and real-robot manipulation tasks demonstrate that the proposed method can effectively replace traditional chunk-based action heads for both specialist and generalist policies. AR-VLA exhibits superior history awareness and substantially smoother action trajectories while maintaining or exceeding the task success rates of state-of-the-art reactive VLAs. Overall, our work introduces a scalable, context-aware action generation schema that provides a robust structural foundation for training effective robotic policies. Code and Videos available at https://arvla.insait.ai
Yutong Hu, Jan-Nico Zaech, Nikolay Nikolov +6
∗INSAIT, Sofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski” · †KU Leuven, Dept. Mechanical Engineering, Research unit Robotics, Automation and Mechatronics · ‡KU Leuven, Dept. Electrical Engineering, Research unit Processing Speech and Images