math.OCNov 3, 2026

Tight Lower Bounds under Matched High-Order Hölder Smoothness and Uniform Convexity

Authors: Cedar Site Bai

Organizations: Department of Computer Science, Purdue University

Abstract

In this paper, we provide tight lower bounds for minimizing high-order Hölder-smooth and uniformly convex functions when their orders match. Specifically, we consider functions whose pthp^{th}-order derivatives are Hölder continuous with degree νν and parameter HH, and that are uniformly convex with degree qq and parameter σσ. When these orders match, namely, q=p+νq = p + ν, we show that any deterministic algorithm with access to derivatives up to order pp requires Ω((Hσ)23(p+ν)−2log⁡Δ0ε)Ω\left(\left(\frac{H}σ\right)^{\frac{2}{3(p+ν)-2}}\log\frac{Δ_0}ε\right) oracle calls to reduce an initial optimality gap of Δ0Δ_0 to εε. This matches the corresponding upper bound and establishes a higher-order uniformly convex counterpart to Nesterov's classical first-order lower bound for strongly convex functions. Rather than directly generalizing Nesterov's classical quadratic-chain construction, we develop a multiscale phase-wise construction that preserves previous oracle responses while maintaining global Hölder smoothness and uniform convexity. Our result resolves the matched case left open by existing lower bounds for the two asymmetric regimes.

Figures & tables

Appendix figures & tables1 asset

Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.

Appendix

Explore similar work

Jun 3, 2026

Sharp First-Order Lower Bounds for Higher-Order Smooth Nonconvex Optimization

We study the deterministic first-order oracle complexity of finding εε-stationary points in smooth nonconvex optimization when the objective satisfies higher-order smoothness assumptions. While the classical ε−2ε^{-2} rate is optimal under only Lipschitz gradients, higher-order smoothness leads to accelerated first-order upper bounds, most notably the ε−7/4ε^{-7/4} rate under Lipschitz Hessians and the ε−5/3ε^{-5/3} rate under Lipschitz third derivatives. The matching lower bounds, however, have remained open. We resolve this gap by proving a new dimension-free first-order lower bound for higher-order smooth nonconvex functions, valid for every finite smoothness order. In particular, our construction gives a matching Ω(ε−7/4)Ω(ε^{-7/4}) lower bound in the Hessian-Lipschitz case and a matching Ω(ε−5/3)Ω(ε^{-5/3}) lower bound in the third-order-smooth regime. The hard instance is based on a block-chain mechanism that enforces blockwise oracle revelation while preserving the smoothness structure needed for the scalar hard instance. The lower-bound construction was discovered with the assistance of ChatGPT 5.5 Pro and subsequently verified by the authors.
Sep 18, 2026

Near-Optimal Acceleration for Smooth ℓp\ell_p / ℓq\ell_q Nondual Convex First-Order Oracle Optimization

We study the optimization of convex objectives with (L,κ−1)(L,κ-1)-Hölder-continuous gradients in ℓq\ell_q over RBpdR B_p^d, 1<κ≤21<κ\le 2. (MG26) provides selectors with a movement bound for the problem of chasing high-dimensional convex nested sets for every p<qp<q and generally reduces Lipschitz convex optimization to bounds on the movement of selectors. We couple that movement with Hölder descent yielding a polynomial-runtime first-order method whose feasible output, in the high-dimensional regime T≤dT\le d and for p<min⁡{q,2}p<\min\{q,2\}, has error O~κ,p,q ⁣(LRκTκ(1+1/p−(1/q−1/2)+)−1),\widetilde O_{κ,p,q}\!\left( \frac{LR^κ}{T^{κ(1+1/p-(1/q-1/2)_+)-1}} \right), after TT queries to a first-order oracle, solving the COLT 2015 open problem of (Guz15), up to logarithmic factors. At (p,q)=(1,2)(p,q)=(1,2), the rate is O~(LRκ/T2κ−1)\widetilde{O}(LR^κ/T^{2κ-1}), including O~(LR2/T3)\widetilde{O}(LR^2/T^{3}) cubic decay in the smooth case.
Oct 1, 2026

Lower Bounds for Stochastic First-Order Algorithms with Variance Reduction in Nonconvex--Concave Minimax Optimization

We establish complexity lower bounds for stochastic first-order algorithms in nonconvex--concave minimax optimization, allowing algorithms to use variance reduction. Our main contribution is a lower bound for a zero-respecting algorithm class that permits variance reduction, extending beyond the algorithmic restrictions imposed by some existing lower bounds. We consider objectives with an LL-Lipschitz continuous joint gradient, a compact convex dual domain of Euclidean radius at most DYD_Y, and a primal value function, defined by maximizing the objective over the dual variable, with initial suboptimality at most ΔΔ. The target accuracy ε\varepsilon is measured by the gradient norm of the Moreau envelope of the constrained primal value function with parameter 1/(2L)1/(2L). Under an unbiased stochastic first-order oracle with variance at most σ2σ^2 and mean-squared smoothness, we prove the lower bound Ω ⁣(L2DYΔε−3+L3DY2Δσ2ε−6)Ω\!\left(L^2D_YΔ\varepsilon^{-3}+L^3D_Y^2Δσ^2\varepsilon^{-6}\right). This result quantifies the dependence on accuracy, dual-domain radius, and oracle noise even when variance reduction is allowed. We also establish complementary lower bounds for nonconvex--strongly-concave minimax optimization. With dual strong-concavity parameter μ>0μ>0 and condition number κ:=L/μκ:=L/μ, we obtain Ω ⁣(LΔκ ε−2+LΔκσ2ε−4)Ω\!\left(LΔ\sqrtκ\,\varepsilon^{-2}+LΔκσ^2\varepsilon^{-4}\right) under the bounded-variance oracle model. Under the additional mean-squared smoothness condition with constant Lˉ\bar L, we obtain Ω ⁣(LΔκ ε−2+ΔLˉσκ3/2ε−3)Ω\!\left(LΔ\sqrtκ\,\varepsilon^{-2}+Δ\bar Lσκ^{3/2}\varepsilon^{-3}\right). Together, these results identify complexity barriers across the concave and strongly concave regimes, with the main nonconvex--concave bound remaining valid for algorithms that use variance reduction.