cs.CVNov 4, 2026

GeoBiaset: A Counterfactual Benchmark for Demographic Bias in World-Level Geolocalization

Authors: Niccolò Niccoli, Silvia Dani, Marco Mistretta, Andrew D. Bagdanov, Marco Bertini, Lorenzo Seidenari

Organizations: University of Florence

Abstract

World-level image geolocalization is an increasingly important task, yet the biases of current models remain poorly understood. Prior work has identified coarse dataset imbalances noting, for instance, that some cities are absent from training sets and that models tend to perform better in wealthier regions. However, no one has yet examined which visual cues drive these disparities. To do so, we introduce GeoBiaset, the first benchmark designed to measure how geolocalization models are influenced by the apparent race of a person inserted into the image foreground. The dataset consists of 9,541 images, pairing existing geotagged background images with counterfactual edits spanning seven races, holding the ground-truth coordinates fixed. Controlled masking experiments show that occlusion and background drift do not fully explain geolocalization degradation. Alongside the benchmark, we introduce the Person-Origin Perturbation Indicators (POPI), novel metrics that quantify model resilience to these demographic perturbations by measuring whether predictions are pulled toward the region associated with the inserted group. Our evaluation of state-of-the-art geolocalization and multimodal large language models reveals a 16-47% drop in continent-level performance when a subject from a demographically mismatched group is inserted. A landmark versus no-landmark analysis and gradient-weighted heatmaps show that models preferentially attend to geographic landmarks when present, but shift attention to facial features in their absence.

Figures & tables

Appendix figures & tables8 assets

Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.

Appendix

Explore similar work

Sep 4, 2026

GeoContext: One Context Ladder, Two Failure Modes in Vision-Language Geolocation: Flat Reliance on User-Provided Location Context and False Confirmation of Location Claims

Visual geolocation benchmarks typically ask a model where an image was captured without accounting for the location context that users often provide. We introduce GeoContext, a resource supporting two complementary tasks: GeoHint, open-ended localization given a true but coarse location hint, and GeoVerify, binary verification of whether an image was taken within 150 m of a claimed place. GeoContext constructs a context ladder by stratifying nearby reference points according to distance and referenceability, allowing the image to remain fixed while the supplied context varies. The benchmark covers 109 sites in 30 cities and evaluates five vision-language models using 21,933 GeoHint responses and 6,270 GeoVerify responses. Our evaluation reveals three main patterns. First, hint repetition varies by only 1.5 percentage points across referenceability tiers and by less than 3 points across distance bands, while the resulting localization error increases steadily with hint distance. Second, behavior depends strongly on no-context performance: at sites with low no-context accuracy, the median ratio between localization error and hint distance is approximately 1.00, whereas at higher-accuracy sites it ranges from 0.24 to 0.69. After correcting for bias introduced by the site grouping procedure, only one of the five models retains a negative accuracy estimate when given a nearby hint. Third, in GeoVerify, no model reaches d' = 1 for decoys immediately beyond the 150 m tolerance. Model rankings also change when sensitivity is separated from response bias, and 83.8% of false acceptances are reported with confidence of at least 0.8. We release the benchmark, construction pipeline, audit decisions, and scoring code.
Jun 3, 2025

AI Knows Where You Are: Exposure, Bias, and Inference in Multimodal Geolocation with KoreaGEO

Recent advances in vision-language models (VLMs) have enabled accurate image-based geolocation, raising serious concerns about location privacy risks in everyday social media posts. Yet, a systematic evaluation of such risks is still lacking: existing benchmarks show coarse granularity, linguistic bias, and a neglect of multimodal privacy risks. To address these gaps, we introduce KoreaGEO, the first fine-grained, multimodal, and privacy-aware benchmark for geolocation, built on Korean street views. The benchmark covers four socio-spatial clusters and nine place types with rich contextual annotations and two captioning styles that simulate real-world privacy exposure. To evaluate mainstream VLMs, we design a three-path protocol spanning image-only, functional-caption, and high-risk-caption inputs, enabling systematic analysis of localization accuracy, spatial bias, and reasoning behavior. Results show that input modality exerts a stronger influence on localization precision and privacy exposure than model scale or architecture, with high-risk captions substantially boosting accuracy. Moreover, they highlight structural prediction biases toward core cities.
Apr 28, 2026

GeoSearch: Augmenting Worldwide Geolocalization with Web-Scale Reverse Image Search and Image Matching

Worldwide image geolocalization, which aims to predict the GPS coordinates of any image on Earth, remains challenging due to global visual diversity. Recent generative approaches based on Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) and Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) leverage candidates retrieved from fixed databases for reasoning, but often struggle with scenes that are absent from the reference set. In this work, we propose GeoSearch, an open-world geolocation framework that integrates web-scale reverse image search into the RAG pipeline. GeoSearch augments LMM prompts with database-retrieved coordinates and textual evidence extracted from web pages. To mitigate noise from irrelevant content, we introduce a two-layer filtering mechanism consisting of image matching, followed by confidence-based gating. Experiments on standard benchmarks Im2GPS3k and YFCC4k demonstrate the superiority of GeoSearch under leakage-aware evaluation. Our code and data are publicly available to support reproducibility.