AtlasULP: Domain-aware Universal Link Prediction via Relation Atlas
Organizations: School of Information and Communication Technology, Griffith University, Australia · Department of Computer Science and Information Technology, La Trobe University, Australia · School of Computer Science and Technology, Tongji University, China
Abstract
Link prediction (LP) is a widely applied task in graph learning. Conventional LP approaches typically follow a dataset-specific paradigm, requiring independent training for each graph and incurring high computational and maintenance costs in large-scale applications. Motivated by these limitations, recent work explores Universal Link Prediction (ULP), aiming to enable training-free inference on arbitrary unseen graphs. However, existing methods primarily rely on subgraph sampling strategies to construct universal representations, which are unable to capture higher-order information due to the exponential growth of higher-order neighborhoods. As a result, they often under-perform on graphs where long-range signals are essential, such as biological networks. Moreover, their prediction models are typically domain-agnostic and lack the ability to adapt to different graph domains, leading to limited generalization. To address these challenges, we propose an Atlas-based Universal Link Prediction framework (AtlasULP), which introduces the relation atlas to capture structural associations between node pairs from both global and local perspectives, enabling a comprehensive characterization of connectivity signals across diverse graph domains. Building upon this representation, we develop a domain-guided prompting ULP model, which generates domain-aware prompt tokens from contextual structures and performs prompt-guided in-context prediction for adaptive link inference. Extensive experiments demonstrate that AtlasULP consistently outperforms state-of-the-art methods across diverse graph domains.
Figures & tables
| Method | C.ele | USAir | PB | NS | CS | Cora | Ave. | |
| Heuristics | ||||||||
| CN | 46.88 12.28 | 82.75 1.54 | 41.15 3.77 | 74.03 1.59 | 56.84 15.56 | 33.85 0.93 | 58.70 0.35 | 56.31 |
| AA | 61.07 5.16 | 86.96 2.24 | 44.12 3.36 | 74.03 1.59 | 68.22 1.08 | 33.85 0.93 | 67.80 2.12 | 62.29 |
| RA | 62.80 4.84 | 87.27 1.89 | 43.72 2.86 | 74.03 1.59 | 68.21 1.08 | 33.85 0.93 | 68.84 2.03 | 62.67 |
| PA | 43.85 4.12 | 77.69 2.29 | 28.93 1.91 | 35.35 3.01 | 6.49 0.61 | 22.09 1.52 | 12.95 0.63 | 32.48 |
| SP | 0.00 0.00 | 0.00 0.00 | 0.00 0.00 | 80.00 1.11 | 41.34 35.58 | 52.97 1.53 | 0.00 0.00 | 24.90 |
Appendix figures & tables1 asset
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
| Dataset | Pretrain | Test | # Nodes | # Edges | Avg. node deg. | Std. node deg. | Max. node deg. | Density |
| Biology | ||||||||
| Ecoli | ✓ | - | 1805 | 29320 | 16.24 | 48.38 | 1030 | 1.8009% |
| Yeast | ✓ | - | 2375 | 23386 | 9.85 | 15.5 | 118 | 0.8295% |
| Celegans | - | ✓ | 297 | 4296 | 14.46 | 12.97 | 134 | 9.7734% |
| Transport | ||||||||
| Power | ✓ | - | 4941 | 13188 | 2.67 | 1.79 | 19 | 0.1081% |