Towards Multiscale Molecular Representation Learning through Geometry-Based Fragmentation for Polymer Property Prediction
Organizations: NEC Laboratories Europe, Heidelberg, Germany · Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany · Present address: INM – Leibniz Institute for New Materials, Saarbrücken, Germany; Saarland University, Department of Computer Science, Saarbrücken, Germany; German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence (DFKI), Saarbrücken, Germany · University of Stuttgart, Institute for Artificial Intelligence, Stuttgart, Germany
Abstract
It is well established that molecular substructures can contribute unequally to chemical and physical properties, with specific motifs or side chains often playing dominant roles. Fragment-based representations have therefore emerged as an effective strategy for incorporating chemically meaningful inductive biases, as exemplified by molecular fingerprints and fragment-based attention mechanisms. However, many existing fragmentation-based machine learning methods rely on predefined chemical rules, which may yield suboptimal fragmentation for previously unseen or chemically unfamiliar structures and often overlook the importance of multiscale molecular representations. To address these limitations, we formulate molecular fragmentation as a radius-constrained optimization problem inspired by the k-center formulation, where the number of clusters is not fixed a priori but emerges from the specified radius, and propose a geometry-based fragmentation method that partitions arbitrary molecular or material structures using largely geometric information, without relying on predefined chemical fragmentation rules. The method provides flexible control over fragment size, enabling the construction of multiscale fragment representations for scale-adaptive modeling. Building on this framework, we develop a geometric fragment-based attention mechanism that integrates multiscale structural information and incorporate it into a multimodal machine learning model combining p-SMILES representations with three-dimensional (3D) conformational information. Experiments on a benchmark polymer dataset show that incorporating 3D conformational information improves prediction accuracy for several properties over models based exclusively on p-SMILES representations. Explainable artificial intelligence analyses further provide insights into the physical relevance of the learned representations.
Figures & tables
| Model Name | Modality | Test RMSE | ||||||
| (eV) | (eV) | (eV) | (eV) | (%) | EPS | |||
| TP (scratch) a | SMILES | 0.58 ±0.01 | 0.60 ±0.03 | 0.36 ±0.03 | 0.46 ±0.04 | 18.9 ±0.51 | 0.57 ±0.11 | 0.099 ±0.015 |
| TP (pretrained) a | SMILES | 0.44 ±0.01 | 0.53 ±0.04 | 0.31 ±0.03 | 0.39 ±0.07 | 17.5 ±0.69 | 0.54 ±0.05 | 0.098 ±0.017 |
| PB+MACE | SMILES | 0.44 ±0.02 | 0.48 ±0.05 | 0.26 ±0.01 | 0.39 ±0.05 | 17.1 ±0.59 | 0.49 ±0.04 | 0.087 ±0.013 |
| PB+MACE | 3D | 0.48 ±0.03 | 0.50 ±0.05 | 0.29 ±0.03 | 0.40 ±0.04 | 17.7 ±0.94 | 0.49 ±0.06 | 0.085 ±0.016 |
| PB+MACE | SMILES+3D | 0.42 ±0.01 | 0.46 ±0.04 | 0.27 ±0.02 | 0.39 ±0.05 | 17.1 ±0.48 | 0.47 ±0.05 | 0.085 ±0.012 |
| Model Name | Branch | Test RMSE | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (eV) | (eV) | (eV) | (eV) | (%) | EPS | |||
| PB+MACE | pSMILES+3D+Fragment | 0.42 ±0.01 | 0.46 ±0.04 | 0.27 ±0.02 | 0.39 ±0.05 | 17.1 ±0.48 | 0.47 ±0.05 | 0.085 ±0.012 |
| PB+MACE | 3D+Fragment | 0.42 ±0.01 | 0.48 ±0.05 | 0.28 ±0.02 | 0.39 ±0.05 | 17.1 ±0.47 | 0.50 ±0.05 | 0.084 ±0.012 |
| PB+MACE | pSMILES+Fragment | 0.42 ±0.02 | 0.46 ±0.05 | 0.27 ±0.03 | 0.38 ±0.05 | 17.1 ±0.48 | 0.51 ±0.05 | 0.085 ±0.012 |
| PB+MACE | pSMILES+3D | 0.41 ±0.02 | 0.45 ±0.04 | 0.27 ±0.02 | 0.38 ±0.05 | 17.5 ±0.52 | 0.48 ±0.04 | 0.081 ±0.013 |
| TP+MACE | pSMILES+3D+Fragment | 0.42 ±0.01 | 0.45 ±0.05 | 0.28 ±0.02 | 0.38 ±0.05 | 16.6 ±0.43 | 0.50 ±0.05 | 0.083 ±0.013 |
| Functional group | Structure | Mechanism |
|---|---|---|
| Carbonyl | C=O | Strong electron withdrawing Peet et al. (2007) ; Ansari et al. (2018) , planar conjugation enhances -overlap Vu et al. (2018) |
| Fluoro | C–F, CF 3 | High electronegativity Peet et al. (2007) ; Ansari et al. (2018) ; bulky groups disrupt packing Wu et al. (2025) |
| Ether | C–O–C | Breaks conjugation Vu et al. (2018) , adds dipole Mogbojuri et al. (2025) |
| Alkyl | –C n H 2n+1 | increases torsion/free volume Wedler et al. (2020) |
| Hydroxyl | –OH | H-bonding increases packing Aziz et al. (2025) but breaks conjugation Vu et al. (2018) |
| Amine | –NH 2 | Electron-donating Peet et al. (2007) ; Ansari et al. (2018) |
Molecular Representation Learning
Molecular representation learning encodes chemical structures and context for prediction, generation, and discovery across chemistry and biology.
See all 216 papers