Zero-Shot Benchmarking of Unified Multimodal Models for Shallow-Water UAV Image Distortion Assessment and Restoration
Organizations: Biological and Environmental Science and Engineering Division, Climate and Livability Initiative, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia · Computer, Electrical and Mathematical Sciences and Engineering, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia
Abstract
Shallow-water UAV imagery provides centimeter-scale observations of benthic environments, but water-induced distortions complicate interpretation. To our knowledge, we present the first systematic zero-shot benchmark of unified multimodal large language models (MLLMs) for both assessing water-induced distortions and restoring shallow-water imagery within the same model framework. We evaluate five open-weight unified MLLMs with frozen pretrained weights and without access to paired reference images or descriptions of the true seabed. The benchmark contains 1,000 image pairs: 600 semi-synthetic UAV scenes created by applying synthetic water distortions to real shallow-water imagery and 400 fully synthetic through-water scenes. Three independent human annotations cover five distortion types. We evaluate four assessment prompts (P0-P3), from direct instruction to structured task decomposition, on all 1,000 images and four diagnosis-guided restoration prompts (R0-R3) on a common 100-image subset. Assessment varies substantially by model and prompt, with systematic prediction biases and a best pooled balanced accuracy of 0.654 for distortion presence. The best pooled PSNR gain is +0.255 dB, no unified MLLM improves pooled LPIPS, and some outputs alter scene structure or hallucinate content. Two restoration-only baselines also show limited transfer: InstructIR achieves a pooled PSNR gain of +0.040 dB, while PromptFix degrades all four pooled metrics under every prompt. These results show that recognizing shallow-water degradation does not imply reliable physical restoration and provide a reproducible baseline for future work.
Figures & tables
| Task | Name | Method | Description | Operative prompt |
| Assessment | P0 Direct | Zero-shot baseline | Minimal instruction; establishes performance without domain scaffolding. | “Analyze this UAV shallow-water image. For caustics, refraction, sun glint, turbidity, and light absorption, assign none, low, medium, or high. Select the dominant distortion and overall restoration need. Judge only visible evidence; return one valid JSON object.” |
| Assessment | P1 Expert | Role/context | Adds a shallow-water remote-sensing and aquatic-optics role without definitions. | “Assess the water-induced degradation in this UAV shallow-water image as a remote-sensing scientist specializing in aquatic optics. Grade the five distortions from visible evidence and identify what most limits seabed interpretability. Return one valid JSON object.” |
| Assessment | P2 Rubric | Definition-guided | Adds physical definitions, severity anchors, and counterexamples for common confounders. | “Assess using operational definitions: caustics are focused bright networks; refraction is water-surface geometric displacement; sun glint is saturated specular reflection; turbidity is a scattering veil; light absorption is broad attenuation/color loss. Use none/low/medium/high anchors and do not confuse seabed appearance with an artifact. Return one valid JSON object.” |
| Assessment | P3 Checklist | Task decomposition | Orders radiometric, illumination, geometry, and visibility checks; only the final answer is exposed. | “Internally check: A) global radiometry, B) caustics versus sun glint, C) geometric instability, and D) scattering/visibility. Then grade all five distortions and restoration need. Do not output chain-of-thought; return only the final JSON.” |
| Restoration | R0 Priority-direct | Direct editing | Applies the score-derived correction order with the least additional scaffolding. | “Restore image [ID] into a plausible undistorted view of the same scene. Apply [ORDERED ACTIONS] from highest to lowest priority using [DIAGNOSIS] and [PRIORITY PLAN]. Correct only diagnosed artifacts and return one natural restored image.” |
| Restoration | R1 Expert optics | Role/context | Requests physically conservative, artifact-specific corrections. | “As an underwater-optics scientist, create a scientifically plausible undistorted version. Correct higher-scoring distortions first: suppress glint without inventing seabed; stabilize refraction; flatten caustics; reduce turbidity; then correct absorption. Preserve radiometric and geometric realism.” |
| Severity level | Distortion type | ||
| None | 0 | Sun glint | 5 |
| Low | 1 | Refraction | 4 |
| Medium | 2 | Caustics | 3 |
| High | 3 | Turbidity | 3 |
| – | – | Light absorption | 2 |
| – | – | None | 0 |
| Category | Operational interpretation |
| Caustics | Focused or network-like bright patterns produced by surface-wave focusing; severity reflects their visual prominence rather than total scene brightness. |
| Refraction | Apparent spatial displacement, warping, or waviness of scene structure caused by refraction at the water surface. |
| Sun glint | Bright specular surface reflections, including saturated highlights that conceal underlying scene content. |
| Turbidity | Scattering-induced haze or veiling, reduced contrast, and loss of visibility attributable to suspended material. |
| Light absorption | Broad attenuation and wavelength-dependent loss of color or detail as light propagates through water. |
| None | No visible evidence of the distortion. |
Image Restoration
Image restoration uses computational methods to recover useful visual content from noisy, blurred, low-resolution, or otherwise degraded images.
See all 386 papers