Overview

AI accountability studies how people and institutions can answer for AI systems’ decisions, actions, and effects. Approaches include assigning legal and organizational responsibility, documenting data and decisions, auditing models and deployments, and using provenance records, monitoring, and human review to reconstruct what happened. Work increasingly addresses agents and other systems that act across tools and organizations, as well as established settings such as healthcare, government, and research. A central tension is that technical evidence and transparency can make actions easier to trace without ensuring anyone has the authority, responsibility, or means to contest decisions and provide remedies.

Latest papers

CardsList

158 papers10 papers in the last four weeks, down 50% on the four weeks before. 0.1% of all new papers.

  1. Human Attribution of Causality to AI Across Agency, Misuse, and Misalignment

    Feb 17, 2026Maria Victoria Carro, David LagnadoCausal AttributionAI Accountability

  2. Using predictive multiplicity to measure individual performance within the AI Act

    Feb 12, 2026Karolin Frohnapfel, Mara Seyfert, Sebastian Bordt +2AI AccountabilityAI Governance

  3. Equity Bias: An Ethical Framework for AI Design

    Jan 28, 2026Mary LockwoodAI EthicsResponsible AI

  4. Retrofitters, pragmatists and activists: Public interest litigation for accountable automated decision-making

    Nov 5, 2025Henry L Fraser, Zahra StardustAI AccountabilityAlgorithmic Accountability

  5. Trustworthy AI and Democracy: A Dual Taxonomy and Operational Framework of Democratic Risks and Contributions

    May 19, 2025Oier Mentxaka, Natalia Díaz-Rodríguez, Mark Coeckelbergh +5AI GovernanceResponsible AI