Implicit Regularization

Zeroth-order (ZO) methods are widely used when gradients are unavailable or prohibitively expensive, including black-box learning and memory-efficient fine-tuning of large models, yet their optimization dynamics in deep learning remain underexplored. In this work, we provide an explicit step size condition that exactly captures the (mean-square) linear stability of a family of ZO methods based on the standard two-point estimator. Our characterization reveals a sharp contrast with first-order (FO) methods: whereas FO stability is governed solely by the largest Hessian eigenvalue, mean-square stability of ZO methods depends on the entire Hessian spectrum. Since computing the full Hessian spectrum is infeasible in practical neural network training, we further derive tractable stability bounds that depend only on the largest eigenvalue and the Hessian trace. Empirically, we find that full-batch ZO methods operate at the edge of stability: ZO-GD, ZO-GDM, and ZO-Adam consistently stabilize near the predicted stability boundary across a range of deep learning training problems. Our results highlight an implicit regularization effect specific to ZO methods, where large step sizes primarily regularize the Hessian trace, whereas in FO methods they regularize the top eigenvalue.

Multi--task learning seeks to improve the generalization error by leveraging the common information shared by multiple related tasks. One challenge in multi--task learning is identifying formulations capable of uncovering the common information shared between different but related tasks. This paper provides a precise asymptotic analysis of a popular multi--task formulation associated with misspecified perceptron learning models. The main contribution of this paper is to precisely determine the reasons behind the benefits gained from combining multiple related tasks. Specifically, we show that combining multiple tasks is asymptotically equivalent to a traditional formulation with additional regularization terms that help improve the generalization performance. Another contribution is to empirically study the impact of combining tasks on the generalization error. In particular, we empirically show that the combination of multiple tasks postpones the double descent phenomenon and can mitigate it asymptotically.

Decentralized training is often regarded as inferior to centralized training because the consensus errors between workers are thought to undermine convergence and generalization. This work challenges this view by introducing decentralized SGD with Adaptive Consensus (DSGD-AC), which uses a time-dependent scaling mechanism to maintain consensus errors throughout the training. We show that adaptive consensus changes the stationary variance of disagreement modes by balancing two effects: it preserves consensus-error magnitude through weaker graph damping while still allowing curvature-dependent damping to shape the disagreement directions. This balance can produce a stronger Hessian-weighted loss-envelope penalty around the deployed model, even when normalized Hessian alignment is weaker than in standard DSGD. Empirical results on image classification show that DSGD-AC reaches flatter solutions and higher test accuracy than standard DSGD and even centralized SGD. Together, these results support consensus errors as a useful implicit regularizer and open a new perspective on the design of decentralized learning algorithms.

In this work, we introduce $\textit{basic inequalities}$ for first-order iterative optimization algorithms, forming a simple yet versatile framework which connects implicit and explicit regularization. Building on related comparison inequalities for optimization iterates that already exist in the literature, we extend and unify these arguments to produce a general framework, which can be used as a tool for statistical analysis. In more detail, let $f$ denote the objective function to be optimized. Given a first-order iterative algorithm initialized at $θ_0$, with current iterate $θ_T$, the basic inequality upper bounds $f(θ_T) - f(z)$ for any reference point $z$ in terms of the accumulated step sizes, and the distances between $θ_0$, $θ_T$, and $z$. These distances are measured in a geometry inherent to the optimization algorithm, which then translates into a notion of regularization being applied across the path of iterates. In addition to refining existing results on gradient descent, we provide new results for mirror descent and other first-order methods. We then show how to use these basic inequalities to derive elementary yet useful bounds on the prediction risk of early-stopped gradient descent and exponentiated gradient descent iterates in generalized linear models. We also supplement these findings with numerical experiments.

We challenge the conventional view of neural network pruning as solely a compression technique, demonstrating that one-shot magnitude pruning serves as a powerful implicit regularizer for ASR. Using Whisper-small, we combine gradient- and Fisher-based sensitivity diagnostics with targeted, component-wise pruning. This reveals architectural asymmetries: decoder FFNs are pruning-fragile, whereas decoder self-attention and the last encoder layers contain redundancy that, when removed, improves generalization. Without fine-tuning, pruning 50% of decoder self-attention reduces WER by 2.38% absolute (20.44% relative) on LibriSpeech test-other; pruning the last four encoder layers at 50% instead yields a 1.72% absolute (14.8% relative) improvement. Gains persisted on Common Voice and TED-LIUM datasets. Beyond regularization benefits, our sensitivity-aware approach enables more aggressive one-shot compression. At 40% sparsity, where established global pruning approaches catastrophically fail, our method preserves near-baseline accuracy. This positions pruning as a first-class architectural design tool: knowing where to prune is as important as how much to prune.