Language Model Self-Assessment

Overview

Language model self-assessment asks whether a model can judge its own answer quality, uncertainty, capabilities, errors, and behavior—and use those judgments to decide when to answer, abstain, verify, or revise. Methods range from verbal confidence, token probabilities, and agreement across samples to hidden-state probes, structured self-questioning, and training with reinforcement learning or self-generated rubrics. Work evaluates these signals on factual and specialized question answering, math and code reasoning, safety tasks, and agent interactions, measuring calibration, selective risk, and whether reflection improves outcomes. Self-assessment can support routing and refinement, but may be sensitive to prompts, miss shared errors, and fail to track objective correctness or actual behavior, making external or environment-grounded checks important.

Latest papers

CardsList

93 papers13 papers in the last four weeks, up 8% on the four weeks before. 0.1% of all new papers.

  1. No Reliable Evidence of Self-Reported Sentience in Small Large Language Models

    Jan 20, 2026Caspar Kaiser, Sean EnderbyLLM EvaluationLanguage Model Self-Assessment

  2. Calibration Is Not Enough: Evaluating Confidence Estimation Under Language Variations

    Jan 12, 2026Yuxi Xia, Dennis Ulmer, Terra Blevins +3LLM Uncertainty EstimationConfidence Estimation in Language Models