Overview

Model editing studies how to update a trained model’s knowledge or behavior without retraining it from scratch, for tasks such as correcting facts, removing sensitive information, personalizing responses, and improving safety. Common approaches locate influential layers or neurons and apply low-rank or closed-form weight changes, while others use adapters, external memories, routing, or retrieval to store and apply edits. Researchers evaluate whether edits work on paraphrases and related questions, stay local to the target, preserve general capabilities, and remain stable across sequential updates, including in multimodal and generative models. A central challenge is balancing useful generalization with protection against unintended changes, forgetting, and degradation after further fine-tuning.

Latest papers

64 papers9 papers in the last four weeks, against 2 the four weeks before. 0.1% of all new papers.

Mar 8, 2026

Attribution-Guided Model Rectification of Unreliable Neural Network Behaviors

The performance of neural network models deteriorates due to their unreliable behavior on non-robust features of corrupted samples. Owing to their opaque nature, rectifying models to address this problem often necessitates arduous data cleaning and model retraining, resulting in huge computational and manual overhead. In this work, we leverage rank-one model editing to establish an attribution-guided model rectification framework that effectively locates and corrects model unreliable behaviors. We first distinguish our rectification setting from existing model editing, yielding a formulation that corrects unreliable behavior while preserving model performance and reducing reliance on large budgets of cleansed samples. We further reveal a bottleneck of model rectifying arising from heterogeneous editability across layers. To target the primary source of misbehavior, we introduce an attribution-guided layer localization method that quantifies layer-wise editability and identifies the layer most responsible for unreliabilities. Extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of our method in correcting unreliabilities observed for neural Trojans, spurious correlations and feature leakage. Our method shows remarkable performance by achieving its editing objective with as few as a single cleansed sample, which makes it appealing for practice.
Nov 8, 2025

Can Fine-Tuning Erase Your Edits? On the Fragile Coexistence of Knowledge Editing and Adaptation

Knowledge editing (KE) offers a lightweight alternative to retraining for updating large language models (LLMs). Meanwhile, fine-tuning remains the default operation for adapting LLMs to new domains and tasks. Despite their widespread adoption, these two post-training interventions have been studied in isolation, leaving open a crucial question: if we fine-tune an edited model, do the edits survive? This question is motivated by practical objectives: removing covert or malicious edits, and preserving beneficial edits. If fine-tuning impairs edits (Fig.1), current KE methods become less efficient, as a newly fine-tuned model requires re-editing; if edits persist, fine-tuned models risk propagating hidden malicious edits, raising serious safety concerns. To this end, we systematically quantify edit decay after fine-tuning across 254 experimental configurations. Our results show that in general, edits decay substantially after subsequent fine-tuning. AlphaEdit exhibits the greatest decay on the zsRE benchmark when applied to GPT-J, where 25.27% of previously successful edits become unsuccessful after fine-tuning. We further find that fine-tuning only the edited layers is sufficient to effectively remove edits, while incurring only modest degradation in downstream performance. Surprisingly, fine-tuning non-edited layers leads to greater edit decay than all-layer fine-tuning. Besides, our activation space analysis reveals that fine-tuning produces a larger and more coherent representational shift, both in magnitude and direction, than KE. Overall, our study underscores the necessity of evaluating KE within the broader LLM application pipeline.
Aug 28, 2025

Turning the Spell Around: Lightweight Alignment Amplification via Rank-One Safety Injection

Safety alignment in Large Language Models (LLMs) often involves mediating internal representations to refuse harmful requests. Recent research has demonstrated that these safety mechanisms can be bypassed by ablating or removing specific representational directions within the model. In this paper, we propose the opposite approach: Rank-One Safety Injection (ROSI), a white-box method that amplifies a model's safety alignment by permanently steering its activations toward the refusal-mediating subspace. ROSI operates as a simple, fine-tuning-free rank-one weight modification applied to all residual stream write matrices. The required safety direction can be computed from a small set of harmful and harmless instruction pairs. We show that ROSI consistently increases safety refusal rates - as evaluated by Llama Guard 3 - while preserving the utility of the model on standard benchmarks such as MMLU, HellaSwag, and Arc. Furthermore, we show that ROSI can also re-align 'uncensored' models by amplifying their own latent safety directions, demonstrating its utility as an effective last-mile safety procedure. Our results suggest that targeted, interpretable weight steering is a cheap and potent mechanism to improve LLM safety, complementing more resource-intensive fine-tuning paradigms.
May 28, 2025

InComeS: Integrating Compression and Selection Mechanisms into LLMs for Efficient Model Editing

Although existing model editing methods perform well in recalling exact edit facts, they often struggle in complex scenarios that require deeper semantic understanding rather than mere knowledge regurgitation. Leveraging the strong contextual reasoning abilities of large language models (LLMs), in-context learning (ICL) becomes a promising editing method by comprehending edit information through context encoding. However, this method is constrained by the limited context window of LLMs, leading to degraded performance and efficiency as the number of edits increases. To overcome this limitation, we propose InComeS, a flexible framework that enhances LLMs' ability to process editing contexts through explicit compression and selection mechanisms. Specifically, InComeS compresses each editing context into the key-value (KV) cache of a special gist token, enabling efficient handling of multiple edits without being restricted by the model's context window. Furthermore, specialized cross-attention modules are added to dynamically select the most relevant information from the gist pools, enabling adaptive and effective utilization of edit information. We conduct experiments on diverse model editing benchmarks with various editing formats, and the results demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of our method.