Multi-Turn Jailbreak Attacks

Overview

Multi-turn jailbreak research studies how attackers use conversation history to make harmful requests seem benign, build persuasive context, or divide a task into seemingly safe steps. Common approaches include simulated dialogue, psychological persuasion, evolutionary search, and reinforcement learning, evaluated on harmful-behavior benchmarks and in medical, multimodal, and tool-using settings. Defenses range from turn-level monitors and cumulative-risk scoring to classifiers, provenance tracking, and response rewriting. A central tension is that single-turn checks miss risks that emerge over time, while earlier intervention can increase false alarms or constrain useful responses; evaluation also depends on reliable judges and comparable attack budgets.

Latest papers

31 papers4 papers in the last four weeks, against 2 the four weeks before. 0.0% of all new papers.

Aug 6, 2025

There are Levels to It: Red Teaming Dialogue With Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning

Red teaming is essential for securing Large Language Models, yet current automated methods remain limited by templates and single-turn attacks. To simulate the complex, interactive nature of real-world adversarial attacks, we introduce a novel red teaming paradigm designed to maximize expected cumulative harm through strategic interaction. By formalizing red teaming as a Markov Decision Process in a hierarchical reinforcement learning framework, we navigate the challenges of sparse rewards and long-horizon planning. Our generative agent learns diverse, multi-turn attacks using a token-level harm reward, consistently uncovering vulnerabilities that bypass baselines. This approach achieves a new state of the art and reframes LLM red teaming as a principled, trajectory-based process.