Multimodal IR

With the rapid proliferation of multimodal information, Visual Document Retrieval (VDR) has emerged as a critical frontier in bridging the gap between unstructured visually rich data and precise information acquisition. Unlike traditional natural image retrieval, visual documents exhibit unique characteristics defined by dense textual content, intricate layouts, and fine-grained semantic dependencies. This paper surveys the VDR landscape as a retrieval problem in its own right, rather than as the front end of a generation pipeline, and does so specifically through the lens of the Multimodal Large Language Model (MLLM) era. We begin by examining the benchmark landscape, including the recent turn toward reasoning-intensive evaluation, and then dive into the methodological evolution along two orthogonal axes: what a retriever is, spanning multimodal embedding models and reranker models, and how it is deployed, from single-stage retrieval through Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) to Agentic systems. Cutting across both, we analyse the representation--efficiency trade-off that late interaction imposes. We ground these categories in leaderboard evidence on where the empirical frontier actually lies, and close by identifying persistent challenges and outlining promising future directions for multimodal document intelligence.

Existing multimodal retrieval benchmarks largely emphasize semantic matching on daily-life images and offer limited diagnostics of professional knowledge and complex reasoning. To address this gap, we introduce ARK, a benchmark designed to analyze multimodal retrieval from two complementary perspectives: (i) knowledge domains (five domains with 17 subtypes), which characterize the content and expertise retrieval relies on, and (ii) reasoning skills (six categories), which characterize the type of inference over multimodal evidence required to identify the correct candidate. Specifically, ARK evaluates retrieval with both unimodal and multimodal queries and candidates, covering 16 heterogeneous visual data types. To avoid shortcut matching during evaluation, most queries are paired with targeted hard negatives that require multi-step reasoning. We evaluate 25 representative text-based and multimodal retrievers and observe a pronounced gap between knowledge- and reasoning-intensive retrieval, with fine-grained visual and spatial reasoning as persistent bottlenecks. We further show that enhancements such as re-ranking, rewriting, and agentic retrieval yield consistent gains, but substantial headroom remains.

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have recently been applied to universal multimodal retrieval, where Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning improves candidate reranking. However, existing approaches remain largely language-driven, relying on static visual encodings and lacking the ability to actively verify fine-grained visual evidence, which often leads to speculative reasoning in visually ambiguous cases. We propose V-Retrver, an evidence-driven retrieval framework that reformulates multimodal retrieval as an agentic reasoning process grounded in visual inspection. V-Retrver enables an MLLM to selectively acquire visual evidence during reasoning via external visual tools, performing a multimodal interleaved reasoning process that alternates between hypothesis generation and targeted visual verification.To train such an evidence-gathering retrieval agent, we adopt a curriculum-based learning strategy combining supervised reasoning activation, rejection-based refinement, and reinforcement learning with an evidence-aligned objective. Experiments across multiple multimodal retrieval benchmarks demonstrate consistent improvements in retrieval accuracy (with 23.0% improvements on average), perception-driven reasoning reliability, and generalization.

Identifying when and where a news image was taken is crucial for journalists and forensic experts to produce credible stories and debunk misinformation. While many existing methods rely on reverse image search (RIS) engines, these tools often fail to return results, thereby limiting their practical applicability. In this work, we address the challenging scenario where RIS evidence is unavailable. We investigate the potential of news article corpora as an alternative to RIS, linking images to relevant articles to infer their dates and locations from article metadata. We evaluate the performance of a news article retrieval pipeline, NewsRECON, which leverages a corpus of over 85,000 articles. Experiments on the TARA dataset show that NewsRECON outperforms prior work and can be combined with a multimodal large language model (MLLM) to achieve new SOTA results in the absence of RIS evidence. Furthermore, NewsRECON generalizes to the 5Pils-OOC benchmark despite geographic and temporal shifts. We make our code available.

The rapid digitization of histopathology slides has opened new opportunities for computational tools in clinical and research workflows. Content-based slide retrieval can help pathologists identify morphologically and semantically related precedent cases, supporting expert diagnosis and example-based education. Effective retrieval of whole-slide images (WSIs), however, remains challenging because gigapixel slides contain abundant irrelevant content, focal diagnostic patterns and slide-level semantic information that must be represented at a practicable search cost. Here we present PathSearch, a retrieval framework that combines fine-grained attentive mosaics with slide-level embeddings aligned through vision-language contrastive learning. Trained on 6,926 slide-report pairs, PathSearch captures both fine-grained morphological cues and high-level semantic patterns to enable accurate and flexible retrieval. The framework supports two key functionalities: (1) mosaic-based image-to-image (I2I) retrieval, ensuring accurate and efficient slide search; and (2) multimodal retrieval, where text queries can directly retrieve relevant slides. PathSearch was evaluated on eight tasks comprising 5,021 evaluation slides, spanning malignancy assessment on frozen and hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained slides, lymph-node metastasis detection, tumor subtyping, mixed-gallery rare-cancer retrieval, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) risk stratification. Internal and external experimental results demonstrate that PathSearch consistently outperforms the strongest existing methods without compromising multimodal accuracy. A multi-center reader study further demonstrated increases in task-level mean diagnostic accuracy, confidence, and inter-observer agreement with PathSearch's support. Together, these results support the effectiveness of PathSearch across diverse retrieval tasks and evaluation settings.

AI agents with advanced reasoning and tool-use capabilities have demonstrated impressive performance in web browsing for deep search. However, existing benchmarks such as BrowseComp primarily focus on textual content, overlooking the prevalence of multimodal content. To bridge this gap, we introduce MM-BrowseComp, a novel benchmark comprising 400 challenging, hand-crafted questions designed to evaluate multimodal retrieval and reasoning capabilities. Unlike prior work, MM-BrowseComp incorporates visual prompts and necessitates the extraction of key evidence from web images and videos to complete questions, rendering text-only approaches insufficient. Additionally, we provide a verified checklist for each question, enabling fine-grained analysis of multimodal dependencies and reasoning paths. Our comprehensive evaluation of 27 state-of-the-art models reveals that even leading models like GPT-5-High with tools achieve only 24.25% accuracy, highlighting the suboptimal multimodal browsing capabilities, establishing MM-BrowseComp as a rigorous new standard for the field.

Analyzing digitized artworks requires both visual interpretation and deep artistic, contextual, and historical knowledge. We introduce ArtSeek, a multimodal framework for art analysis that combines multimodal large language models with retrieval-augmented generation. Unlike prior work, our pipeline relies only on image input, so it applies to artworks without links to Wikidata or Wikipedia, common in most digitized collections. ArtSeek integrates three components: a late-interaction multimodal retrieval module, a contrastive multitask network predicting artist, genre, style, media, and tags, and an agentic reasoning strategy enabled through in-context examples. Central to this approach is WikiFragments, a dataset of image-text fragments extracted from the entire English Wikipedia to support knowledge-grounded multimodal reasoning. Our multimodal query encoding raises retrieval NDCG@5 from 33.9 to 44.9 over encoding the full image-text query, and fixed-budget token pooling keeps late-interaction search practical over millions of fragments at under 7% of the cost of full multi-vector retrieval. ArtSeek sets a new state of the art in artwork attribute classification, with +8.4% F1 in style classification over GraphCLIP, and gains +7.1 BLEU@1 on ArtPedia captioning. On five knowledge-grounded question answering benchmarks graded by an LLM judge from a different model family, retrieval helps where the answer is documented in our index or lies inside the classifier's label space (+0.19 mean correctness on two of them) and is neutral where it is not; what separates the two regimes is how much of a benchmark our knowledge base covers. The gain transfers to two non-Qwen backbones (+0.22 to +0.28). A blind human study and a qualitative analysis of successes and failures corroborate this picture and expose where retrieval still misleads. Data and code: https://cilab.di.uniba.it/artseek/

Different machine learning models can represent the same underlying concept in different ways. This variability is particularly valuable for in-the-wild multimodal retrieval, where the objective is to identify the corresponding representation in one modality given another modality as input. This challenge can be effectively framed as a representation alignment problem. For example, given a sentence encoded by a language model, retrieve the most semantically aligned image based on representations produced by an image encoder, or vice versa. To gain insights into the performance impact of different metrics, embedding spaces, and representation alignment for retrieval tasks, we first empirically investigate the geometric relationships between visual and textual embeddings derived from both vision-language models and combined unimodal models. We then align these representations using four standard similarity metrics as well as two learned ones, implemented via neural networks of different architectures with varying losses across multiple benchmarks. Our experimental findings indicate that cosine similarity consistently outperforms all the investigated metrics in representation alignment tasks, and that Wasserstein distance provides a complementary perspective on cross-modal distributional differences. We also observe that our proposed custom contrastive loss is advantageous over the MSE loss for aligning image and text representations, for both multilayer perceptrons and transformer-based models. Taken together, our findings offer novel insights and practical considerations for researchers working in multimodal information retrieval, particularly in real-world, cross-modal applications. Our code is publicly available.