Overview

Pipeline parallelism assigns consecutive model layers to different devices, then passes activations and gradients between stages so larger models can run across limited memory and compute. Training methods such as GPipe, 1F1B, interleaved schedules, and PipeDream trade pipeline bubbles and activation memory against synchronization and stale weights; inference systems use stage scheduling and micro-batching to balance throughput with latency. Current work adapts partitioning and schedules to heterogeneous hardware, long sequences, and mixture-of-experts models, while also overlapping communication or compressing activations. A central tension is improving device utilization without making communication, memory use, or asynchronous updates undermine latency and convergence.

Latest papers

36 papers7 papers in the last four weeks, against 1 the four weeks before. 0.0% of all new papers.

Mar 5, 2026

Parallelization Strategies for Dense LLM Deployment: Navigating Through Application-Specific Tradeoffs and Bottlenecks

Breakthroughs in the generative AI domain have fueled an explosion of large language model (LLM)-powered applications, whose workloads fundamentally consist of sequences of inferences through transformer architectures. Within this rapidly expanding ecosystem, dense LLMs--those that activate all model parameters for each token generation--form the foundation for advanced expert-based variants. Dense models continue to dominate because of their strong generalization ability, scalability, ease of fine-tuning, and versatility across diverse tasks. In LLM inference systems, performance is mainly characterized by latency, response time, and throughput (i.e., tokens generated per unit of time). Latency and throughput are inherently coupled: optimizing for one often comes at the expense of the other. Moreover, batching strategies and parallelism configurations, which are essential when dense model parameters exceed device memory capacity, can significantly affect both latency and overall system throughput. This paper (i) investigates the workloads of two representative dense LLMs--Llama-3.1-70B and Llama-3.1-405B, focusing in particular on intra-node parallelization schemes, (ii) analyzes how input characteristics, batching, and parallelism strategies influence latency flexibility and the latency-throughput tradeoff, and (iii) identifies key performance bottlenecks that inform design choices for meeting service-level agreements (SLAs) and sustaining inference quality. Our empirical evaluations reveal that Tensor Parallelism (TP) improves the latency objectives while Pipeline Parallelism (PP) is better-suited for throughput-oriented applications. We highlight that their hybrid usage by controlling the TP and PP degrees provides control over the latency-throughput interplay.
Mar 3, 2026

SENTINEL: Stagewise Integrity Verification for Pipeline Parallel Decentralized Training

Decentralized training introduces critical security risks when executed across untrusted, geographically distributed nodes. While existing Byzantine-tolerant literature addresses data parallel (DP) training through robust aggregation methods, pipeline parallelism (PP) presents fundamentally distinct challenges. In PP, model layers are distributed across workers where the activations and their gradients flow between stages rather than being aggregated, making traditional DP approaches inapplicable. We propose SENTINEL, a verification mechanism for PP training without computation duplication. SENTINEL employs lightweight momentum-based monitoring using exponential moving averages (EMAs) to detect corrupted inter-stage communication. Unlike existing Byzantine-tolerant approaches for DP that aggregate parameter gradients across replicas, our approach verifies sequential activation/gradient transmission between layers. We provide theoretical convergence guarantees for this new setting that recovers classical convergence rates when relaxed to standard training. Experiments demonstrate successful training of up to 4B-parameter LLMs across untrusted distributed environments with up to 176 workers while maintaining model convergence and performance.
Mar 2, 2026

Orchestrating Multimodal DNN Workloads in Wireless Neural Processing

In edge inference, wireless resource allocation and accelerator-level deep neural network (DNN) scheduling have yet to be co-optimized in an end-to-end manner. The lack of coordination between wireless transmission and accelerator-level DNN execution prevents efficient overlap, leading to higher end-to-end inference latency. To address this issue, this paper investigates multimodal DNN workload orchestration in wireless neural processing (WNP), a paradigm that integrates wireless transmission and multi-core accelerator execution into a unified end-to-end pipeline. First, we develop a unified communication-computation model for multimodal DNN execution and formulate the corresponding optimization problem. Second, we propose O-WiN, a framework that orchestrates DNN workloads in WNP through two tightly coupled stages: simulation-based optimization and runtime execution. Third, we develop two algorithms, RTFS and PACS. RTFS schedules communication and computation sequentially, whereas PACS interleaves them to enable pipeline parallelism by overlapping wireless data transfer with accelerator-level DNN execution. Simulation results demonstrate that PACS significantly outperforms RTFS under high modality heterogeneity by better masking wireless latency through communication-computation overlap, thereby highlighting the effectiveness of communication-computation pipelining in accelerating multimodal DNN execution in WNP.
Sep 28, 2025

OctoPipe: Reducing Pipeline Bubbles for Heterogeneous Models via Co-Optimizing Partitioning, Placement, and Scheduling

Pipeline parallelism is widely used to train large language models (LLMs). However, increasing heterogeneity in model architectures exacerbates pipeline bubbles, thereby reducing training efficiency. Prior approaches typically optimize a single phase of the pipeline schedule (i.e., partitioning, placement, or scheduling), leaving substantial pipeline bubbles. While promising, co-optimization poses three key challenges: (1) complex performance modeling, (2) a combinatorial search space, and (3) irregular execution orders. To address these challenges, we propose OctoPipe, a pipeline parallelism system to jointly optimize partitioning, placement, and scheduling. First, we build a graph-based pipeline simulator to model heterogeneous pipeline execution for co-optimization. Second, on top of the simulator, we develop an iterative bubble-aware tuner to efficiently explore the combinatorial search space. Third, we implement a unified pipeline executor that dynamically orchestrates computation and communication to support irregular execution orders without deadlocks while maximizing communication-computation overlap. Experiments show that OctoPipe achieves 1.09--1.49×\times throughput improvement over the state-of-the-art pipeline parallelism approaches across various heterogeneous model configurations and GPU cluster scales.
Sep 25, 2025

Concertina: Data-Centric Adaptive Pipeline Parallelism for Efficient Heterogeneous Long-Context LLM Training

Long context training is crucial for extending LLM context windows. Existing schemes, such as sequence parallelism, incur substantial communication overhead. Pipeline parallelism (PP) reduces this cost, but its effectiveness hinges on partitioning granularity. Batch-level PP employing sequence packing exhibits high memory consumption in long-context scenarios, whereas token-level PP splitting sequences into slices alleviates memory overhead but may introduce performance degradation. Moreover, the skewed sequence-length distribution in real-world datasets defeats any monolithic, static choice of PP granularity. In this paper, we propose Dynamic Pipeline Parallelism (DPP), which transforms PP granularity from a static design choice into a workload-adaptive optimization space over packed, split, and hybrid chunks. DPP further introduces a new coupling between heterogeneous pipeline scheduling and gradient checkpointing. To solve this coupling, \name co-optimizes dynamic chunk scheduling with Stage-Aware Chunk-Level Adaptive Checkpointing. Comprehensive experiments demonstrate that \name achieves up to 1.69\texttimes\ speedup over FlexSP and up to 1.40\texttimes\ over MEPipe. The source code is available at https://github.com/wsjdsg/InfiniPipe-code.
Apr 7, 2025

Prima.cpp: Fast 30-70B LLM Inference on Heterogeneous and Low-Resource Home Clusters

On-device inference offers privacy, offline use, and instant response, but consumer hardware restricts large language models (LLMs) to low throughput and capability. To overcome this challenge, we present prima.cpp, a distributed on-device inference system that runs 30-70B LLMs on consumer home clusters with mixed CPUs/GPUs, insufficient RAM/VRAM, slow disks, Wi-Fi links, and heterogeneous OSs. We introduce pipelined-ring parallelism (PRP) to overlap disk I/O with compute and communication, and address the prefetch-release conflict in mmap-based offloading. We further propose Halda, a heterogeneity-aware scheduler that co-optimizes per-device CPU/GPU workloads and device selection under RAM/VRAM constraints. On four consumer home devices, a 70B model reaches 674 ms/token TPOT with <6% memory pressure, and a 32B model with speculative decoding achieves 26 tokens/s. Compared with llama.cpp, exo, and dllama, our proposed prima.cpp achieves 5-17 times lower TPOT, supports fine-grained model sizes from 8B to 70B, ensures broader cross-OS and quantization compatibility, and remains OOM-free, while also being Wi-Fi tolerant, privacy-preserving, and hardware-independent. The code is available at https://github.com/OpenCPIL/prima.cpp.