Overview

The field asks which generated examples are useful for a particular learner and task, across settings such as language-model training, image recognition, and tabular prediction. Methods rank or filter samples using signals such as task utility, realism, diversity, embedding coverage, decision-boundary value, and feedback from model training; some also select groups of examples or guide generation toward underrepresented regions. These approaches can reduce the amount of synthetic data needed, but the best signals and selection rules vary with the generator, training budget, and target task. A central open tension is that convenient proxies—such as provenance, uncertainty, or similarity to real data—do not always predict downstream benefit, so evaluation against the intended training objective remains important.

Latest papers

31 papers6 papers in the last four weeks, against 1 the four weeks before. 0.0% of all new papers.

Dec 18, 2025

Interpretable Similarity of Synthetic Image Utility

Synthetic medical image data can unlock the potential of deep learning (DL)-based clinical decision support (CDS) systems through the creation of large scale, privacy-preserving, training sets. Despite the significant progress in this field, there is still a largely unanswered research question: "How can we quantitatively assess the similarity of a synthetically generated set of images with a set of real images in a given application domain?". Today, answers to this question are mainly provided via user evaluation studies, inception-based measures, and the classification performance achieved on synthetic images. This paper proposes a novel measure to assess the similarity between synthetically generated and real sets of images, in terms of their utility for the development of DL-based CDS systems. Inspired by generalized neural additive models, and unlike inception-based measures, the proposed measure is interpretable (Interpretable Utility Similarity, IUS), explaining why a synthetic dataset could be more useful than another one in the context of a CDS system based on clinically relevant image features. The experimental results on publicly available benchmark datasets from various color medical imaging modalities including endoscopic, dermoscopic and fundus imaging, indicate that selecting synthetic images of high utility similarity using IUS can result in relative improvements of up to 54.6% in terms of classification performance. The generality of IUS for synthetic data assessment is demonstrated also for grayscale X-ray and ultrasound imaging modalities. IUS implementation is available at https://github.com/innoisys/ius.