Hypergraph-Enhanced Dual Convolutional Network for Bundle Recommendation

Graph Neural Networks trained on heterogenous bipartite graphs form a common basis in recommendation systems. These graphs often express relations that vary in cardinality, for example, user-item preferences are one-to-many and user-attribute features are one-to-one. Traditionally, a unique loss function is applied for all of the network components which is often Bayesian Personalized Ranking (BPR). While BPR works well for the recommendation task, we find that it causes attribute embeddings to collapse to near-random geometry -- a silent failure that leaves standard ranking metrics largely unaffected and therefore invisible to conventional evaluation. This in turn pollutes user node embeddings, which are shaped by both edge types simultaneously, hurting downstream tasks like personalization, segmentation, etc. Here we propose a Cardinality-Decomposed Loss (CDL) that combines both Cross Entropy (CE) and BPR to enable the model to collectively optimize for relations across cardinalities. We confirm this CE-BPR conflict by showing the two losses compete in the shared encoder's parameter space. We evaluate CDL on five datasets spanning two structural configurations -- one-to-one attributes on user nodes (MovieLens-1M, Last.fm-360K, PayPal Audience Factory, BookCrossing) and on item nodes (Yelp) -- and find that CDL consistently improves discriminability in attribute embeddings. We also show that ranking (NDCG) improves when attributes carry meaningful preference signal, but conflicts with it when the correlation is weak. We use a lambda parameter to navigate this trade-off, and a lambda-sweep reveals that dataset behavior is governed by two graph properties -- semantic alignment and topology leakage. Semantic alignment measures whether the attribute predicts preferences, while topology leakage measures whether the graph's connectivity already encodes it.

Sequential recommendation has increasingly shifted toward generative recommenders that combine sequential patterns with semantic item information. Yet these methods are often evaluated on a small set of widely used benchmarks, raising a key question: do these benchmarks actually require the advanced modeling capabilities that modern generative recommenders claim to provide? We conduct a benchmark audit with an intentionally simple graph heuristic. Starting from only the last one or two interacted items, it retrieves candidates from a few-hop item-transition graph and ranks them by item-feature similarity. Despite using no sequence encoder, generative objective, or training, this heuristic matches or outperforms many modern baselines, with relative NDCG@10 improvements of 38.10% and 44.18% over the best competing baseline on Amazon Review Sports and CDs. We show that this behavior reflects shortcut solvability rather than an artifact of one heuristic. We identify three shortcut structures that can make next-item prediction easier than expected: low-branching local transitions, feature-smooth transitions, and limited dependence on long user histories. These shortcuts need not appear together; even one or two strong signals can make simple local retrieval highly competitive, while weakening them makes the benefits of more sophisticated models clearer. Across 14 datasets, model rankings vary substantially with dataset properties, yet the heuristic remains competitive on 10 of them. Our findings suggest that strong performance on standard benchmarks does not always demonstrate advanced sequential, semantic, or generative modeling ability. We call for more careful dataset selection and dataset-level diagnostic analysis when using benchmarks to support claims about new recommendation models.

Graph-based retrieval at billion-node scale requires jointly solving three tightly coupled problems -- graph construction, representation learning, and real-time serving -- yet existing work addresses each in isolation. We present RankGraph-2, a framework deployed at Meta that co-designs all three lifecycle stages for similarity-based retrieval (U2U2I and U2I2I), where each stage's requirements shape the others. Serving requires a co-learned cluster index to avoid expensive online KNN -- this pushes index co-training into the training objective. Training benefits from the observation that similarity-based retrieval tolerates pre-computed neighborhoods, eliminating online graph infrastructure -- this requires construction to produce self-contained data. Construction must also support hour-level refresh for item coverage. Acting on these cascading requirements, RankGraph-2 reduces hundreds of trillions of edges to hundreds of billions via subsampling with popularity bias correction, pre-computes multi-hop neighborhoods via personalized PageRank, and co-learns a residual-quantization cluster index that reduces serving computational cost by 83%. This lifecycle co-design enables a simple architecture to achieve 3.8 x higher recall than a GAT + Deep Graph Infomax model on a bipartite graph and 2.1 x higher than PyTorch-BigGraph on item retrieval. RankGraph-2 delivers up to +0.96% CTR and +2.75% CVR, and has powered 20+ retrieval launches across major surfaces.