Allocation Stability and Wald Inference under Variance-Aware UCB

Bandit algorithms generate data for downstream inference, but adaptive sampling biases post-bandit sample means. We analyze this bias for stable index algorithms, including UCB1 and its generalizations, and derive sharp leading-order expressions for the sample-mean bias and expected $Z$-statistic, in bandit experiments of fixed horizon $T$. Our characterization reveals the algorithmic origin of bias through a key index-function-dependent quantity, which we term effective exploration rate. For example, under UCB1, the effective exploration rate is of order $\sqrt{\log T}$, and the standardized bias of any arm (that is not uniquely optimal) decays at the extremely slow rate $1/\sqrt{\log T}$. We also show how the choice of the index function affects both regret and bias, which reveals a regret-bias trade-off: more exploratory algorithm reduces bias but increases regret. We further show how bias most severely distorts confidence intervals and hypothesis tests when the tested arm is one of the tied-optimal arms. Our sharp characterization for bias uses a novel empirical fluid approximation of the algorithm's sampling dynamics, which may be of independent interest.

Contextual bandit algorithms have transformed modern experimentation by enabling real-time adaptation for personalized treatment. Yet these advantages create challenges for statistical inference due to adaptivity. We study inference with contextual-bandit data without assuming a well-specified outcome model. In this setting, we show a previously overlooked issue: standard algorithms such as LinUCB may fail to stabilize under misspecified working models, leading to non-Gaussian estimator behavior and invalid inference. This issue is practically important, as misspecified working models -- such as approximations of complex dynamical systems -- are often employed by online agents in real-world adaptive experiments to balance reward, computational tractability, and robustness. We develop an inverse-probability-weighted Z-estimation framework for a broad class of marginal moment targets, including projection parameters, structural parameters with noisy contexts, and off-policy values. We identify a stability condition tailored to this framework, scaled inverse-propensity convergence, under which the IPW-Z estimator is consistent and asymptotically normal with a consistent sandwich variance estimator. We further establish sufficient conditions for scaled inverse-propensity convergence for several policy classes, including multi-armed bandit algorithms and smooth contextual allocation policies. Simulations and a HeartSteps V1 real-data-calibrated application show reliable coverage and competitive performance across multiple targets. Overall, our results highlight the importance of stability-aware adaptive design for valid post-experiment inference.

We study the sampling allocation of LinUCB in the small-gap regime, where the reward gaps are of order at most $n^{-1/2}$ over the decision horizon $n$. This scaling captures the hard instances underlying worst-case regret lower bounds, for which LinUCB is known to be near optimal up to logarithmic factors in $n$. Using a mean-field perspective, we characterize this allocation through the empirical sampling distribution, a macroscopic object that averages the effect of adaptive decisions over the horizon, and identify its limit as $n\to\infty$. We establish that in this regime, the empirical sampling distribution induced by LinUCB converges to the set of D-optimal designs. This central result reveals that, in the small-gap regime, LinUCB not only achieves near optimal minimax regret but also allocates samples in a way that is asymptotically efficient for learning the reward parameter, thereby connecting regret-driven online learning with information-efficient experimental design. Building on the optimal design limit, we obtain two useful consequences. First, we refine the asymptotic regret analysis of LinUCB in the small-gap regime by characterizing its leading-order constant in the limit. Second, we show that, despite LinUCB's adaptive sampling strategy, the regularized least-squares estimator satisfies a central-limit-type theorem in the small-gap regime, thereby enabling valid statistical inference for the reward parameter.