GVPO: Group Variance Policy Optimization for Large Language Model Post-Training

Post-training plays a pivotal role in enhancing the reasoning capabilities and task-specific expertise of large language models (LLMs). Despite recent advances in post-training methods, such as Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO), their practical deployment remains impeded by training instability arising from the reliance on importance sampling. We introduce Group Variance Policy Optimization (GVPO), a novel post-training method that integrates the analytical solution of KL-constrained reward maximization into its gradient weighting scheme. This formulation provides an intuitive interpretation: GVPO's gradient corresponds to the mean squared error between the central distance of implicit rewards and that of actual rewards. GVPO offers two key advantages: (1) it guarantees a unique optimal solution, exactly to the KL-constrained reward maximization objective, and (2) it enables flexible sampling distributions without requiring importance sampling. Beyond general post-training, we show that GVPO naturally extends to on-policy distillation (OPD). Furthermore, GVPO enables the optimization of a broad family of extended OPD objectives, providing a principled foundation for diverse objective design. By unifying theoretical guarantees with practical adaptability, GVPO establishes a new paradigm for reliable and versatile LLM post-training and on-policy distillation.

Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) has become a widely used approach for post-training Large Language Models (LLMs) for reasoning. In GRPO, the group gradients induced by different queries within the same mini-batch are directly averaged to form the policy update. However, these group gradients can point in conflicting directions. Our empirical analysis suggests that group-gradient conflicts tend to be associated with less effective policy updates, motivating the need for a reliable aggregated update direction under such conflicts. Standard GRPO aggregation treats the realized group gradients as deterministic contributions and does not account for differences in their reliability during aggregation. To address this issue, we propose Gradient Uncertainty-Aware Policy Optimization (GUPO), which models each group gradient as a random variable under a Bayesian formulation and estimates its probability distribution. GUPO then derives gradient uncertainty using a Dirichlet-based formulation and uses it to calibrate the contribution of each group gradient during aggregation. Extensive experiments on multiple benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness of GUPO.

Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has become a standard paradigm for post-training large language models. While Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) is widely adopted, its coarse credit assignment uniformly penalizes failed rollouts, lacking the token-level focus needed to efficiently address specific deviations. Self-Distillation Policy Optimization (SDPO) addresses this by providing denser, more targeted logit-level supervision that facilitates rapid early improvement, yet it frequently collapses during prolonged training. We trace this late-stage instability to two intrinsic flaws: self-distillation on already-correct samples introduces optimization ambiguity, and the self-teacher's signal reliability progressively degrades. To resolve these issues, we propose Sample-Routed Policy Optimization (SRPO), a unified on-policy framework that routes correct samples to GRPO's reward-aligned reinforcement and failed samples to SDPO's targeted logit-level correction. SRPO further incorporates an entropy-aware dynamic weighting mechanism to suppress high-entropy, unreliable distillation targets while emphasizing confident ones. Evaluated across five benchmarks and two model scales, SRPO achieves both the rapid early improvement of SDPO and the long-horizon stability of GRPO. It consistently surpasses the peak performance of both baselines, raising the five-benchmark average on Qwen3-8B by 3.4% over GRPO and 6.3% over SDPO, while simultaneously yielding moderate response lengths and lowering per-step compute cost by up to 17.2%.