LLM-powered Query Expansion for Enhancing Boundary Prediction in Language-driven Action Localization

Temporal action localization (TAL) requires recognizing the target event and localizing its start and end times precisely in untrimmed videos. Recent vision-language formulations improve semantic reasoning and support language-conditioned outputs, but their autoregressive decoders still generate tokens from left to right, preventing later semantic evidence from revising earlier timestamp predictions. We adapt masked diffusion vision-language models (MDVLMs) to TAL so that semantic tokens and boundary tokens remain editable throughout iterative denoising with bidirectional attention, allowing temporal boundaries and semantic content to be refined jointly. Direct adaptation, however, creates two TAL-specific mismatches: standard masked diffusion training corrupts all positions uniformly at random, but the time tokens are more reliable when enough semantic context is available; and token-level cross-entropy does not reflect temporal IoU. To address these mismatches, we introduce a Planned Training Objective that uses boundary-aware masking and step-weighted reconstruction to rehearse the late recovery of time tokens, together with a Step-Level IoU Reward that provides overlap-aware supervision during denoising. A standard sequence-level cross-entropy term provides the base reconstruction signal. Experiments on ActivityNet-RTL, ActivityNet-1.3, and THUMOS-14 show that MDVLM-TAL improves both temporal reasoning and boundary localization over autoregressive vision-language baselines, with especially strong gains under stricter temporal IoU criteria.

Zero-shot temporal action localization (ZS-TAL) consists of classifying and localizing actions in untrimmed videos, where action classes are unseen at training time. Existing work uses Vision and Language Models (VLMs), taking advantage of their strong zero-shot transfer capabilities. Yet, these models face evident challenges with fine-grained action classification, making it difficult to directly use them to distinguish between the presence and absence of an action. Most current methods for ZS-TAL address these challenges by training models on large-scale video datasets, which require annotated data and often result in limited generalization performance. Recently, approaches discarding the use of labeled data have emerged as an alternative. Following this direction, we propose a novel approach, ``Textual Guidance for finer localization of actions in videos'' (TEGU), that compensates for the lack of supervision from training data by exploiting rich textual information derived from large language models and structured text extracted from captions. This additional linguistic context can improve fine-grained discrimination by providing richer cues about fine-grained action differences within videos. We validate the effectiveness of the proposed method by conducting experiments on the THUMOS14 and the ActivityNet-v1.3 datasets. Our results show that, by exploiting rich textual information for improved action localization, TEGU outperforms state-of-the-art ZS-TAL approaches that do not involve training

Action anticipation predicts future human actions from partial video under incomplete context and temporal uncertainty. Recent systems introduce large language models (LLMs), vision-language models (VLMs), or language-derived semantics at different stages, but reported gains are difficult to interpret when task formulation, visual pretraining, supervision, decoder design, and evaluation code change simultaneously. The central contribution of this review is an evidence-aware design map that crosses task regime with the point at which language-derived information intervenes. We characterise task regimes along six axes. These axes organise the literature into five broad task families: single-action, sequence, object-interaction, cross-view, and planning-oriented settings. C1-C3 locate interventions in context construction, goal/intention modelling, and future decoding, while C4 is treated as an adjacent, emerging grounding/executability extension. Unlike a generic processing pipeline, the map links each intervention to an appropriate counterfactual, failure diagnosis, and permissible evidence claim. Supporting contributions include a protocol-level audit of Ego4D-LTA and EPIC-KITCHENS-100, a multidimensional evidence profile, and the Backbone-Aware Comparison and Ablation Protocol (BCAP). The unresolved EK-100 record is treated as a reporting-comparability case study and is not used as a leaderboard. Evidence for LLM benefits, goal ambiguity, and horizon effects is therefore formulated as testable hypotheses requiring matched validation, not as causal conclusions. The accompanying package contains the coded evidence, source locators, protocol metadata, and versioned catalogue used in the review.