stat.MLJun 26, 2025

Gaussian Invariant Markov Chain Monte Carlo

Authors: Michalis K. TitsiasAngelos AlexopoulosSiran LiuPetros Dellaportas

Organizations: Google DeepMind, UK · Athens University of Economics and Business, Greece · UCL, UK

Abstract

We develop sampling methods, which consist of Gaussian invariant versions of random walk Metropolis (RWM), Metropolis adjusted Langevin algorithm (MALA) and second order Hessian or Manifold MALA. Unlike standard RWM and MALA, we show that Gaussian invariant sampling can lead to ergodic estimators with improved statistical efficiency. This is due to a remarkable property of Gaussian invariance that allows us to obtain exact analytical solutions to the Poisson equation for Gaussian targets. These solutions can be used to construct efficient and easy to use control variates for variance reduction of estimators under any intractable target. We demonstrate the new samplers and estimators in several examples, including high dimensional targets in latent Gaussian models where we compare against several advanced methods and obtain state-of-the-art results. We also provide theoretical results regarding geometric ergodicity, and an optimal scaling analysis that shows the dependence of the optimal acceptance rate on the Gaussianity of the target.

Explore similar work

Jul 8, 2026cs.LG

Gradient-free Riemannian Langevin Sampler

We address the problem of efficiently sampling multimodal probability distributions, where standard Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods often suffer from poor mixing and mode trapping. To mitigate these issues, we propose Gradient-free Riemannian Langevin Sampler (GRiLS), a novel proposal that improves exploration without requiring gradient evaluations of the target density. Our approach introduces a Riemannian metric which reshapes the local geometry in order to facilitate transitions across modes. The resulting gradient-free MCMC algorithm is particularly suitable for complex, computationally expensive targets where derivatives are unavailable or impractical. The GRiLS proposal requires knowing the mean and covariance of the target density, which we estimate using an ensemble of interacting particles. Empirical results on multimodal benchmarks demonstrate that GRiLS achieves improved mixing compared to existing gradient-based and gradient-free MCMC approaches.
Ricardo Baptista, Olivier Zahm
Jul 1, 2026stat.CO

Optimal scaling of MCMC algorithms: the Hamiltonian approach

We present a simple, yet general approach to study the scaling properties as the dimensionality of Metropolised MCMC sampling algorithms increases. The study relies on the symmetries of the Hamiltonian formalism and ultimately on the symmetry of the Metropolis-Hastings formula. Our findings contain, as particular cases, many known results for the Random Walk Metropolis, MALA and other algorithms. In addition, they provide, in an easy way, new optimal scaling results for a variety of proposal mechanisms, including implicit proposals and proposals generated with the help of differential equation integrators. The analysis applies to targets that are products of a given, not necessarily univariate distribution, and also to cases where the different terms in the product are scaled differently. We show how to construct gradient-based MALA-like proposals where the variance of the proposal as the dimension dd increases may be taken as O(1/dμ)O(1/d^μ), with μ>0μ>0 arbitrarily small, to be compared with the values μ=1μ= 1 for Random Walk Metropolis and μ=1/3μ=1/3 for MALA.
P. Dobson, J. M. Sanz-Serna, K. C. Zygalakis
Apr 21, 2026cs.LG

On two ways to use determinantal point processes for Monte Carlo integration

The standard Monte Carlo estimator I^NMC\widehat{I}_N^{\mathrm{MC}} of fdω\int fdω relies on independent samples from ωω and has variance of order 1/N1/N. Replacing the samples with a determinantal point process (DPP), a repulsive distribution, makes the estimator consistent, with variance rates that depend on how the DPP is adapted to ff and ωω. We examine two existing DPP-based estimators: one by Bardenet & Hardy (2020) with a rate of O(N(1+1/d))\mathcal{O}(N^{-(1+1/d)}) for smooth ff, but relying on a fixed DPP. The other, by Ermakov & Zolotukhin (1960), is unbiased with rate of order 1/N1/N, like Monte Carlo, but its DPP is tailored to ff. We revisit these estimators, generalize them to continuous settings, and provide sampling algorithms.
Guillaume Gautier, Rémi Bardenet, Michal Valko