cs.LGApr 21, 2026

On two ways to use determinantal point processes for Monte Carlo integration

Authors: Guillaume GautierRémi BardenetMichal Valko

Organizations: †Univ. Lille, CNRS, Centrale Lille, UMR 9189 – CRIStAL, 59651 Villeneuve d’Ascq, France · *Inria Lille-Nord Europe, 40 avenue Halley 59650 Villeneuve d’Ascq, France · ‡DeepMind Paris, 14 Rue de Londres, 75009 Paris, France · ∗Inria Lille-Nord Europe, 40 avenue Halley 59650 Villeneuve d’Ascq, France

Abstract

The standard Monte Carlo estimator I^NMC\widehat{I}_N^{\mathrm{MC}} of fdω\int fdω relies on independent samples from ωω and has variance of order 1/N1/N. Replacing the samples with a determinantal point process (DPP), a repulsive distribution, makes the estimator consistent, with variance rates that depend on how the DPP is adapted to ff and ωω. We examine two existing DPP-based estimators: one by Bardenet & Hardy (2020) with a rate of O(N(1+1/d))\mathcal{O}(N^{-(1+1/d)}) for smooth ff, but relying on a fixed DPP. The other, by Ermakov & Zolotukhin (1960), is unbiased with rate of order 1/N1/N, like Monte Carlo, but its DPP is tailored to ff. We revisit these estimators, generalize them to continuous settings, and provide sampling algorithms.

Explore similar work

Jul 7, 2026stat.ML

Fast determinantal sampling on general spaces and diffusion geometry

Determinantal point processes have recently emerged as a kernel-based alternative to standard independent sampling for constructing efficient minibatches, coresets, and other compact representations of large-scale datasets. In particular, sampling mechanisms based on DPPs are believed to demonstrate better approximation properties compared to classical i.i.d. samplers, even at the scale of the exponent. One of the key strengths of DPP based samplers is that they can be deployed over very general spaces, in contrast to more classical sampling methods beyond i.i.d. which tend to work in very well-structured settings, principally Euclidean spaces. In this work, we establish explicit rate guarantees for determinantal sampling in spaces that extend far beyond known Euclidean setups, focusing on spectral kernels obtained from eigenspaces of naturally associated Laplacian and other Markov diffusion operators. This includes, in particular, Riemannian manifolds and weighted networks. In determinantal sampling from compact Riemannian manifolds, we establish sampling rates that automatically pick up the intrinsic dimensionality dintd_{\text{int}} of the underlying manifold. In the setting of networks, we investigate DPP-based samplers on the celebrated k-nearest neighbour graphs, as well as weighted random geometric graphs, and demonstrate a similar improved dependence on the intrinsic dimensionality of the data. Overall, our approach achieves guarantees of (sample size)1212dint\big(\text{sample size}\big)^{-\frac{1}{2}-\frac{1}{2d_{\text{int}}}} that match known rates on Euclidean spaces of comparable dimension. In terms of techniques, we connect to the celebrated Weyl's Law for manifold spectra, and leverage tools from the theory of Markov diffusions and Dirichlet forms as well as certain ingredients from the theory of pseudodifferential operators, which could be of independent interest in this area.
Hoang-Son Tran, Pranav Gupta, Subhroshekhar Ghosh
May 13, 2026stat.ML

State-of-art minibatches via novel DPP kernels: discretization, wavelets, and rough objectives

Determinantal point processes (DPPs) have emerged as a kernelized alternative to vanilla independent sampling for generating efficient minibatches, coresets and other parsimonious representations of large-scale datasets. While theoretical foundations and promising empirical performance have been demonstrated, there are two challenges for current proposals for DPP-based coresets or minibatches. The first is the need for families of DPPs with certain key variance reduction properties, usually constructed in a continuous setting, of which there are few known examples. The second is the need for an ad-hoc construction of a discrete DPP defined on a given dataset, that inherits such variance reduction. In this work, we contribute to the programme of establishing DPPs as a subsampling toolbox for ML by advancing on these two fronts. First, we propose new DPPs on the Euclidean space based on wavelets, with provably better accuracy guarantees than the best known rates. Second, we introduce a general method to convert such continuous DPPs, which are more amenable to proving analytical statements, into discrete kernels, which are pertinent for subsampling tasks such as minibatch and coreset constructions. This conversion mechanism simultaneously preserves the desired variance decay and reveals a low-rank decomposition of the discrete kernel, which makes sampling the corresponding DPP computationally inexpensive. En route, we enlarge the class of ML tasks amenable to improvements via DPP-based minibatches and coresets to include objective functions with arbitrarily low regularity, and rate guarantees that explicitly adapt to this regularity.
Hoang-Son Tran, Pranav Gupta, Rémi Bardenet +1
Jun 26, 2025stat.ML

Gaussian Invariant Markov Chain Monte Carlo

We develop sampling methods, which consist of Gaussian invariant versions of random walk Metropolis (RWM), Metropolis adjusted Langevin algorithm (MALA) and second order Hessian or Manifold MALA. Unlike standard RWM and MALA, we show that Gaussian invariant sampling can lead to ergodic estimators with improved statistical efficiency. This is due to a remarkable property of Gaussian invariance that allows us to obtain exact analytical solutions to the Poisson equation for Gaussian targets. These solutions can be used to construct efficient and easy to use control variates for variance reduction of estimators under any intractable target. We demonstrate the new samplers and estimators in several examples, including high dimensional targets in latent Gaussian models where we compare against several advanced methods and obtain state-of-the-art results. We also provide theoretical results regarding geometric ergodicity, and an optimal scaling analysis that shows the dependence of the optimal acceptance rate on the Gaussianity of the target.
Michalis K. Titsias, Angelos Alexopoulos, Siran Liu +1