Pruning is a core technique for compressing neural networks to improve computational efficiency. This process is typically approached in two ways: one-shot pruning, which involves a single pass of training and pruning, and iterative pruning, where pruning is performed over multiple cycles for potentially finer network refinement. Although iterative pruning has historically seen broader adoption, this preference is often assumed rather than rigorously tested. Our study presents one of the first systematic and comprehensive comparisons of these methods, providing rigorous definitions, benchmarking both across structured and unstructured settings, and applying different pruning criteria and modalities. We find that each method has specific advantages: one-shot pruning proves more effective at lower pruning ratios, while iterative pruning performs better at higher ratios. Building on these findings, we advocate for patience-based pruning and introduce a hybrid approach that can outperform traditional methods in certain scenarios, providing valuable insights for practitioners selecting a pruning strategy tailored to their goals and constraints. Source code is available at https://github.com/janumiko/pruning-benchmark.
Weight pruning is a common technique for compressing large neural networks. We focus on the challenging post-training one-shot setting, where a pre-trained model is compressed without any retraining. Existing one-shot pruning methods typically optimize a single objective, such as a layer-wise reconstruction loss or a second-order Taylor approximation of the training loss. We highlight that neither objective alone is consistently the most effective across architectures and sparsity levels. Motivated by this insight, we propose MOONSHOT, a general and flexible framework that extends any single-objective pruning method into a multi-objective formulation by jointly optimizing both the layer-wise reconstruction error and second-order Taylor approximation of the training loss. MOONSHOT acts as a wrapper around existing pruning algorithms. To enable this integration while maintaining scalability to billion-parameter models, we propose modeling decisions and introduce an efficient procedure for computing the inverse Hessian, preserving the efficiency of state-of-the-art one-shot pruners. When combined with state-of-the-art pruning methods on Llama-3.2 and Llama-2 models, MOONSHOT reduces C4 perplexity by up to 32.6% at 2:4 sparsity and improves zero-shot mean accuracy across seven classification benchmarks by up to 4.9 points. On Vision Transformers, it improves accuracy on ImageNet-1k by over 5 points at 70% sparsity, and on ResNet-50, it yields a 4-point gain at 90% sparsity.
Neural network pruning reduces model size by removing less important parameters while aiming to preserve predictive performance. Although the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis (LTH) shows that sparse subnetworks can match dense networks when trained from suitable initializations, its iterative pruning procedure requires multiple complete training cycles. This work evaluates progressive magnitude-based pruning as a single-cycle alternative. The method gradually increases sparsity during training using a linear schedule and updates pruning masks based on active weight magnitudes. We conduct systematic experiments on CIFAR-10 and MNIST across ResNet, VGG-style, and LeNet architectures, comparing the proposed method with representative iterative and initialization-based pruning baselines, including LTH, SNIP, and GraSP. On CIFAR-10, the method achieves 95.12% accuracy on ResNet-18 at 72.9% sparsity, compared with 90.5% reported for LTH. At extreme sparsity, it achieves 93.13% accuracy on a VGG-like architecture at 97% sparsity, compared with approximately 92.0% for SNIP, and 93.44% accuracy on VGG-19 at 97.97% sparsity, compared with 92.19% for GraSP at 98% sparsity. A sparsity-accuracy analysis on ResNet-18 further shows that accuracy remains within 0.1 percentage points of the dense baseline across 70--85% sparsity. These results indicate that progressive magnitude-based pruning provides an effective single-cycle approach for neural network sparsification under the evaluated settings.
Romana Qureshi, Hafida Benhidour, Said Kerrache +1
Structured pruning is a promising approach for compressing large language models (LLMs), yet existing methods rely heavily on greedy heuristics that produce myopic decisions, and often fail to precisely meet target compression budgets. We present SNIPER, a two-stage structured pruning framework that solves a knapsack optimization over coarse-granularity components to yield conditionally optimal parameter allocations with respect to fixed importance estimates, followed by a fine-grained pruning stage to meet strict budget constraints. We introduce the Compression Ratio Adherence Factor (CRAFT) to quantify budget fidelity, showing that while existing pruners deviate from target compression ratios by up to 33%, SNIPER achieves near-exact adherence with a CRAFT score of 0.98. Evaluations across four diverse architectures over a set of 18 tasks spanning five domains demonstrate SNIPER's consistent improvements in average performance retention and task-level stability over six state-of-the-art pruners. Across all pruning configurations, SNIPER achieves an excellent mean rank of 1.25, indicating its robust cross-architectural generalizability and excellent reliability.