cs.CVJun 10, 2026

Finding Sparse Subnetworks in One Training Cycle via Progressive Magnitude-Based Pruning

Authors: Romana QureshiHafida BenhidourSaid KerracheNahlah Aljeraisy

Organizations: Department of Computer Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Abstract

Neural network pruning reduces model size by removing less important parameters while aiming to preserve predictive performance. Although the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis (LTH) shows that sparse subnetworks can match dense networks when trained from suitable initializations, its iterative pruning procedure requires multiple complete training cycles. This work evaluates progressive magnitude-based pruning as a single-cycle alternative. The method gradually increases sparsity during training using a linear schedule and updates pruning masks based on active weight magnitudes. We conduct systematic experiments on CIFAR-10 and MNIST across ResNet, VGG-style, and LeNet architectures, comparing the proposed method with representative iterative and initialization-based pruning baselines, including LTH, SNIP, and GraSP. On CIFAR-10, the method achieves 95.12% accuracy on ResNet-18 at 72.9% sparsity, compared with 90.5% reported for LTH. At extreme sparsity, it achieves 93.13% accuracy on a VGG-like architecture at 97% sparsity, compared with approximately 92.0% for SNIP, and 93.44% accuracy on VGG-19 at 97.97% sparsity, compared with 92.19% for GraSP at 98% sparsity. A sparsity-accuracy analysis on ResNet-18 further shows that accuracy remains within 0.1 percentage points of the dense baseline across 70--85% sparsity. These results indicate that progressive magnitude-based pruning provides an effective single-cycle approach for neural network sparsification under the evaluated settings.

Explore similar work

Apr 6, 2025stat.ML

Hyperflux: Pruning Reveals Importance

Network pruning is used to reduce inference latency and power consumption in large neural networks. However, most methods focus on empirical results at the expense of understanding the pruning process. We introduce Hyperflux, a novel L0L_0 method which models pruning as a continuously evolving system determined by flux, the gradient response to a weight's removal, and pressure, a global regularization driving weights toward pruning. By exploiting this model, Hyperflux's pruning behavior becomes understandable at both microscopic (weight regrowth/pruning) and macroscopic (sparsity convergence, etc.) levels. We also introduce a novel pressure scheduler that reliably targets desired sparsities. Hyperflux achieves competitive results with ResNet-50, VGG-19 and DeiT-T/S on CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100 and ImageNet datasets.
Eugen Barbulescu, Antonio Alexoaie, Lucian Busoniu
May 23, 2026cs.LG

Pruning Deep Neural Networks via the Marchenko--Pastur Distribution

We study a Marchenko--Pastur (MP) random-matrix approach to pruning deep neural networks with very small post-pruning fine-tuning budgets. The main practical contribution is accuracy retention under short calibration and fine-tuning schedules, rather than a long post-pruning reoptimization pipeline. The theory gives deterministic data-path certificates: if the removed component RR has small propagated logit effect LsRψ1(s)L_s \| R ψ_1(s) \|_\infty, pruning decreases an elastic-net objective and preserves samples whose dense margin exceeds twice the perturbation. The zero-budget case gives perfect pruning; a prune--restore extension models weight restoration inside a fixed sparse-execution pattern; and an additive L2L_2-regularized model shows admissible random-like components vanish at the training limit, with persistent spikes stabilizing as the MP bulk collapses. Under iid-Gaussian sufficient conditions, the fitted MP edge σ+σ_+ gives a high-probability layerwise budget signal. On ImageNet-1k, after only three distillation epochs, ViT-B/16 2:4+2{:}4{+}ToMe reaches 83.41%83.41\% top-1 (1.70-1.70 pp from dense) at 59.81%59.81\% sparse-execution MAC reduction, with 1.388×1.388\times best-observed A40 native-2:42{:}4 backend speedup for the same checkpoint and ToMe graph; a separate no-ToMe A100 endpoint gives 2.705×2.705\times. At structured sparsity, ViT-B/16 6:126{:}12 reaches 83.74%83.74\%, ViT-L/16 8:168{:}16 dense+permutation reaches 85.33%85.33\% (0.51-0.51 pp), and ConvNeXtV2-Base 12:1612{:}16 reaches 86.35%86.35\% (0.37-0.37 pp). For CNNs, ResNet50 8:168{:}16 dense+permutation reaches 75.87%75.87\% (0.26-0.26 pp), and ResNet152d CAST-conv+permutation reaches 81.33%81.33\% (1.53-1.53 pp) at 50%{\sim}50\% MAC accounting with a 1.62×1.62\times A40 im2col+2:4+2{:}4 sparse-GEMM audit.
Leonid Berlyand, Theo Bourdais, Houman Owhadi +1
Sep 14, 2026cs.LG

Theoretical Guarantees for One-Shot Magnitude Pruning and Compute-Adaptive Early Exit

We study compute reduction in neural networks through a unified partial versus full computation view, captured by one-shot magnitude pruning in the static regime and early exit in the adaptive regime. In an asymptotic single-neuron model, we prove a concentration theorem for one-shot magnitude pruning with explicit rates. We also introduce the conditional perceptron for early exit and show that its excess generalization error decays as a power of the compute gap, with an exponent that grows to infinity as the alignment between partial and full computations tends to one. We then extend the analysis to deep networks, characterizing how pruning-induced distortions accumulate with depth and deriving a corresponding compute-accuracy tradeoff for frozen-backbone early exit under a neural network Gaussian process model. Numerical simulations corroborate the predicted scaling laws.
Erdem Koyuncu