Harmonious Color Pairings: Insights from Human Preference and Natural Hue Statistics

Human color categories are not uniformly distributed in perceptual space, yet most computational color models still assume fixed and evenly structured representations. In this paper, we present a focused analytical extension of the COLIBRI fuzzy color model by investigating perceptual asymmetry between hue categories. Using previously collected large-scale human color categorization data, we introduce quantitative measures of category extent and boundary uncertainty, namely Wideness and Boundary Width, derived from fuzzy membership functions at the α = 0.5 level. The analysis reveals a strong imbalance between the two categories: yellow occupies a compact and sharply constrained region of the hue space, whereas green spans a substantially broader interval and exhibits a more extended transition structure. The results show that perceptual color categories are not only fuzzy, but also highly non-uniform in their geometric organization. This asymmetry suggests that some categories behave as narrow, highly specific perceptual labels, while others function as broad, tolerant regions of human color naming. These findings provide a new perspective on linguistic color categorization and extend the interpretability of the COLIBRI framework for perceptually grounded color modeling.

Color naming is influenced not only by physical color values but also by the semantic context in which colors are used. This paper investigates context-dependent color naming by mapping color-name datasets from Cosmetics, Crayola, and Car-color vocabularies onto the 86 fuzzy color categories of the COLIBRI color model. Contextual variation is analyzed using category coverage, Shannon entropy, and maximum lift. The results show that the three contexts occupy the COLIBRI color space differently: Cosmetics covers 48 of 86 fuzzy categories, Crayola covers 50, and Car colors cover 40. The results demonstrated that Crayola provides the broadest and most balanced use of the fuzzy color space, Cosmetics is mainly concentrated around warm-tone regions, and Car colors are more specialized around blue and achromatic regions. These findings show that color naming cannot be fully explained by numerical color similarity alone and that semantic context plays an important role in human color interpretation. The proposed framework supports the development of context-aware color models for design analytics, product search, recommendation systems, and human-centered artificial intelligence.

Evaluating the perceptual alignment between Contrastive Vision-Language Models (CVLMs) and humans is typically constrained by traditional benchmarks that overlook fine-grained semantic and cultural nuances. In this work, we propose a novel evaluation framework that leverages the gamified, discrete color space of the board game Hues and Cues. By mapping the board's 480 color cells to the CIE xy chromaticity diagram, we calculate empirical perceptual distances across a carefully curated 100-word vocabulary spanning seven semantic categories. To properly contextualize model performance, we establish an empirical lower bound of expected error-the Human Consistency baseline-calculated via Leave-One-Out (LOO) cross-validation on a dense dataset of color associations collected from 325 human observers through a custom digital interface. We evaluate 162 models across multiple architectural families and pre-training datasets to assess their semantic color grounding. Our results demonstrate that while CVLMs successfully replicate human cognitive biases, such as idealized memory colors for concrete physical referents (e.g., food and plants), they systematically diverge from the human baseline in abstract, subjective, and pop-culture domains. We identify two distinct failure modes in severely misaligned concepts: semantic misclassification and a systematic uncertainty collapse into a default blue coordinate. Furthermore, we reveal that highly curated pre-training datasets are significantly more effective than massive, uncurated corpora in mitigating these severe misalignments. Ultimately, this work highlights that despite their broad categorization capabilities, current CVLMs still fail to capture the nuanced, localized consensus of human color memory, emphasizing the value of gamified tasks in exposing underlying model biases. The data and code are publicly available to test other metrics.