Quality control in sublinear time: a case study via random graphs

In recent work, Marcussen, Rubinfeld, and Sudan introduced the notion of quality control problems, which aim to capture the task of determining if a given input is truly random. Formally, their goal is to accept typical inputs from the specified distribution while rejecting every input whose value of a specified statistic is far from the distributional baseline. This captures the empirical practice of using specified statistics as a proxy for the quality of randomness. Empirical algorithms, however, have not exploited the asymmetry in the definition of quality control problems, which require soundness guarantees in the worst-case while only seeking average-case completeness. Their work abstracted a problem definition emphasizing this asymmetry and used it to give efficient quality control algorithms for assessing the randomness of graphs. In this work, we introduce and study quality control problems over sequences, where the goal is to distinguish a sequence of i.i.d. characters from sequences where some specified pattern appears too often (or too infrequently) as a subsequence. We consider this problem in both the finite-alphabet setting and for real-valued sequences. We refer to the former setting as the pattern counting problem. In the latter case, the natural notion of a pattern is to consider the relative ordering of the characters in the subsequence, and we refer to this as the permutation pattern counting problem. Algorithms to approximately count (permutation) patterns of length $k$ in a worst-case sequence of length $n$ can provably require exponential in $k$ queries into the sequence. In contrast, we show that by taking advantage of the asymmetry in the definition of quality control, we give algorithms that run in poly$(k)$ time to solve these problems. We also prove that any quality control algorithm (over some natural distributions) requires superlinear queries in $k$.

Correlation clustering is a fundamental unsupervised learning problem. On complete graphs, both the min-disagreement and min-max objectives admit constant-factor approximations, yet on general (non-complete) graphs, the best guarantees blow up to $O(\log n)$ and $O(\sqrt{n})$. This gap between the two regimes motivates the following question: are there classes of incomplete graphs that circumvent the lower bounds on general graphs and admit approximation guarantees approaching those attainable on complete graphs? We study a natural class of graphs obtained by randomly subsampling a complete signed graph $G$, where each edge is independently deleted with probability $q$. For such graph instances both for the min-max and the min-disagreement objectives, we prove approximation guarantees (depending on $q$) that are substantially better than the bounds achievable for general graphs. We supplement our theoretical results with experiments that also suggest that the approximation ratios of our algorithm are close to those of the complete graph and better than the worst-case bounds for general (non-complete) graphs.

Recovering the underlying $k$-clustering of a set $U$ of $n$ points by asking pair-wise same-cluster queries has garnered significant interest in the past few years. Given a query $S \subset U$, $|S|=2$, the oracle returns "yes" if the points are in the same cluster and "no" otherwise. For adaptive algorithms, the query complexity is known to be $Θ(nk)$, while non-adaptive algorithms are extremely limited: even for $k=3$, such algorithms require $Ω(n^2)$ queries, matching the trivial upper bound. However, non-adaptivity is highly desirable since it allows queries to be asked in parallel. To break the quadratic barrier for non-adaptive queries, we study a natural generalization of this problem to subset queries for $|S|>2$, where the oracle returns the number of clusters intersecting $S$. Previous work obtained an $O(n)$ query adaptive algorithm, but the realm of non-adaptive algorithms remained completely unknown. In this paper, we give the first non-adaptive algorithms for clustering with subset queries. Our main result is a non-adaptive algorithm making $O(n \log k \cdot (\log k + \log\log n)^2)$ queries, improving to $O(n \log \log n)$ when $k$ is constant. In addition to non-adaptivity, we make other practical considerations, such as enforcing a bound, $s$, on the query size. We show $Ω(\max(n^2/s^2,n))$ queries are necessary and obtain algorithms making $\smash{\widetilde{O}(n^2k/s^2)}$ queries for any $s \leq \sqrt{n}$ and $\smash{\widetilde{O}(n^2/s)}$ queries for any $s \leq n$. Finally, we obtain improved upper bounds when the clusters are roughly balanced, and when the algorithm is allowed two rounds of adaptivity.