Explainable Information Processing in Particle Swarm Optimization through Landscape and Search Behavior Analysis

Particle swarm optimization (PSO) has been widely applied to solve complex optimization problems from real-world applications due to its efficient exploration of large solution spaces and the ability to converge towards optimal solutions without requiring gradient information. Common swarm topologies in standard PSO and its variants, e.g., Ring and Star, can be regarded as graphs, where each edge connects only two particles. Such topology structures allow direct interactions only between connected particle pairs, and thus often fail to directly capture the higher-order social relationships that are necessary for navigating complex search landscapes. Therefore, this article proposes a novel PSO variant termed Hypergraph-assisted Particle Swarm Optimization (HPSO). In HPSO, the topology of the particles in a swarm is modeled by a hypergraph, in which hyperedges are used to connect multiple particles. This allows multiple particles within a hyperedge to interact directly. Furthermore, an adaptive hypergraph updating strategy is designed to periodically reconstruct the topology based on cumulative average particle displacement, thereby maintaining swarm diversity throughout the evolutionary process. In the experiments, the effectiveness of HPSO is verified on the IEEE CEC'17 benchmark suite, and the results demonstrate that HPSO achieves promising performance across various types of functions. Furthermore, the ablation experiment demonstrates that HPSO has excellent search capabilities.

Particle swarm optimization (PSO) is a widely used metaheuristic, prized for its simplicity and small parameter set. Although decades of research have produced numerous PSO variants that improve performance by modifying key components (e.g., parameter schedules, swarm topologies, or updating rules), two fundamental challenges persist. First, most existing approaches are problem-specific and hand-crafted, leading to poor cross-task generalization and forcing practitioners to navigate an impractically large design space, which also hinders systematic reuse of prior effective mechanisms. Second, mainstream implementations remain CPU-bound, constraining scalability and substantially increasing computational cost in real-world applications. To address these challenges, we propose {AutoPSO}, a highly automated metaframework for constructing customized PSO algorithms. AutoPSO formulates PSO-based optimization as a bi-level process: an outer search explores the joint space of effective PSO components, while an inner loop instantiates candidate variants to solve the target task and provide feedback. The outer search operates over a curated, open-design component pool, supporting flexible replacement of the component set and the outer optimizer. Crucially, by leveraging EvoX for population tensorization and batched evaluations, AutoPSO can efficiently assess thousands of particles within practical time budgets. Comprehensive experiments on numerical benchmarks and neuroevolution robotic control tasks demonstrate that AutoPSO consistently discovers novel PSO variants that significantly outperform strong baselines. Ablation and scalability studies further highlight the contribution of individual algorithmic components and confirm that AutoPSO achieves increasing performance gains with larger swarm sizes. Code is available at {https://github.com/EMI-Group/autopso}.

Explainability in Many-Objective Optimization (MaO) is currently hindered by the escalating complexity of the Pareto front, which renders the relationship between high-dimensional decision variables and objective outcomes increasingly opaque. As the number of objectives exceeds the limits of traditional visualization, decision-makers encounter a cognitive drought'' in identifying relevant trade-offs or specifying target regions without a priori knowledge. To bridge this interpretability gap, we introduce the {Partition-Guided Distance Saliency (PGDS)} framework, a novel XAI approach designed for continuous optimization landscapes. Our framework automates the explanation process through a three-stage pipeline that prioritizes geometric intuition over abstract rules. First, we employ a surrogate model that learns how geometric distances in the decision space map to proximity in the objective space. Second, to address the difficulty of manual target selection in high dimensions, the framework automatically partitions the objective landscape into distinct regions and identifies local Dominating Points'' to serve as automated targets for improvement. Third, we quantify how sensitive a solution's position is to each decision variable by measuring the distance shifts induced by perturbations to each variable. This allows PGDS to categorize features as either Drivers'' which facilitate convergence toward preferred regions, or Blockers'' which represent geometric constraints hindering further progress. Validation on 10-objective benchmarks and a physics-informed engineering problem (Welded Beam) demonstrates that PGDS provides differentiated, actionable insights that traditional visualization and rule-based XAI methods fail to provide.