On a Geometry of Interbrain Networks

Correlation matrices are fundamental summaries of functional brain networks, yet standard analyses often treat entries independently, ignoring the curved geometry of correlation space. Existing geometric methods frequently lack closed-form operations or depend on arbitrary region ordering, limiting scalability. We introduce a scalable geometric framework with two components: (i) the Off-log metric, a smooth transformation mapping correlation matrices to symmetric zero-diagonal matrices. This enables closed-form expressions for distances, Frechet means, and linear models, allowing standard statistical modeling without complex manifold optimization. (ii) Grassmannian subspace discrimination, which compares subjects via principal-angle distances between eigenvector subspaces, resolving inherent sign and basis ambiguities. Both components integrate into standard machine-learning workflows for inference, regression, and classification. Validated across two clinical cohorts (Parkinson's and psychosis) and three ageing fMRI datasets, the Off-log metric increased sensitivity in permutation tests and matched or exceeded Riemannian and Euclidean baselines in classification. Brain-age prediction performance was comparable, with Riemannian metrics excelling in two of three cohorts. The Grassmannian method consistently outperformed Euclidean baselines, highlighting disease-relevant networks. Overall, geometry-aware representations improve sensitivity and predictive performance while remaining straightforward to deploy at scale.

A growing number of techniques leverage the spatial structures that underlie many real-world datasets. Despite these advances, the complementary task of estimating spatial structures and understanding their role within these techniques has often been overlooked. In neurophysiological data analysis specifically, numerous methods exist to estimate brain connectivity, but most are not explicitly model-based, dynamic, multivariate, or directed. To address these limitations, we previously introduced noise-driven heat modelling on graphs for neurophysiological connectivity estimation. In this study, we extend this framework by relaxing earlier noise assumptions and adding regularisation to improve robustness. We also develop a simulation procedure to characterise and evaluate our technique in a controlled setting. Finally, we demonstrate that the technique is able to capture meaningful spatial structure across two experiments, each using two real-world datasets. The explicit model formulation of our connectivity estimator has the potential to improve the interpretability of graph-based techniques across a wide range of applications. The code implementing our method is available at https://github.com/sgoerttler/Heat_Connectivity.

Trial-to-trial variability limits how reliably neural population geometry can be estimated, while comparisons across populations depend on neuron and trial counts, response quality, and clustered sampling. We quantified within-session geometric reliability using Shesha, the Spearman correlation between representational dissimilarity matrices estimated from independent trial subsets, in all 39 Steinmetz Neuropixels sessions and in olfactory bulb and piriform cortex recordings from Bolding and Franks. Steinmetz analyses matched neurons and repetitions, compared observed reliability with a stationary residual-bootstrap expectation, and used mouse-level or mouse-clustered inference. Mean matched reliability was 0.0402 across 312 area-by-session recordings. Regional differences and reliability above the stationary benchmark did not survive correction. Temporal effects received the strongest support: interleaving early and late trials increased reliability relative to blocked allocation ($Δ=0.02666$, $q=0.001953$), and RDM similarity declined with within-session lag (mean mouse-level slope $=-0.01912$, $q=0.001953$; $n=10$ mice). Outer-cross-fitted reliability was not associated with choice-direction coupling or stimulus or response-direction decoding after correction. Olfactory comparisons remained descriptive because few paired sessions and no animal identities were available. In held-out simulations, associative recurrence outperformed feedforward subspace denoising but not divisive normalization. Representational geometry became less reproducible with temporal separation within a session, and comparisons across neural populations require sampling calibration and independent inference.