Development of Deep Learning Optimizers: Approaches, Concepts, and Update Rules

Balancing convergence speed, generalization capability, and computational efficiency remains a core challenge in deep learning optimization. First-order gradient descent methods, epitomized by stochastic gradient descent (SGD) and Adam, serve as the cornerstone of modern training pipelines. However, large-scale model training, stringent differential privacy requirements, and distributed learning paradigms expose critical limitations in these conventional approaches regarding privacy protection and memory efficiency. To mitigate these bottlenecks, researchers explore second-order optimization techniques to surpass first-order performance ceilings, while zeroth-order methods reemerge to alleviate memory constraints inherent to large-scale training. Despite this proliferation of methodologies, the field lacks a cohesive framework that unifies underlying principles and delineates application scenarios for these disparate approaches. In this work, we retrospectively analyze the evolutionary trajectory of deep learning optimization algorithms and present a comprehensive empirical evaluation of mainstream optimizers across diverse model architectures and training scenarios. We distill key emerging trends and fundamental design trade-offs, pinpointing promising directions for future research. By synthesizing theoretical insights with extensive empirical evidence, we provide actionable guidance for designing next-generation highly efficient, robust, and trustworthy optimization methods. The code is available at https://github.com/APRIL-AIGC/Awesome-Optimizer.

Neural-network optimization in 2025-2026 is no longer well described as a succession of new Adam variants. The design space has expanded from coordinates to matrices and layers, from fixed training horizons to policies over time, and from mathematical update rules to state representations that must survive sharding and low-precision computation. This survey organizes recent optimizers and training optimization methods along four largely independent axes: temporal estimation, update geometry, horizon management, and representation and systems. It connects the spectral normalization of Muon, the historical matrix statistics of Shampoo and SOAP, adaptive and hybrid matrix methods, memory-efficient optimizers, schedule-free training, small-batch corrections, and quantized optimizer states. The central empirical conclusion is deliberately non-triumphal: matrix-aware methods represent a genuine advance, but there is no context-independent replacement for AdamW. Rankings change with model scale, data-to-parameter ratio, batch size, schedule, parameter partition, tuning budget, and whether the target metric is tokens, FLOPs, wall-clock time, or memory. The practical consequence is a compositional view of optimizer design and a stricter protocol for evaluating optimizer claims.

Despite the central role of optimization in deep learning, most optimizers rely on update structures whose functional form is fixed before training begins. This static design can limit their ability to respond to changing gradient behavior across the loss landscape, where training may shift between stable, noisy, and inconsistent regimes. This study proposes PILOT (Policy-Informed Learned OpTimizer), an online optimizer that adapts its update behavior during training. Rather than using a fixed balance between momentum, normalization, and sign-based updates, PILOT uses gradient-direction agreement as a signal of local training stability. Conditioning the update rule on this agreement signal allows the optimizer to adjust its behavior when gradients become stable, noisy, or inconsistent. Experiments on FashionMNIST and CIFAR-10 show that PILOT consistently achieves the highest accuracy among the evaluated optimizers across convolutional settings. On the CNN architecture, PILOT reaches 94.13% on FashionMNIST and 81.94% on CIFAR-10. On ResNet-18, it further improves performance, reaching 95.71% on FashionMNIST and 93.42% on CIFAR-10. These results suggest that learning how to adapt the update structure during training can improve performance across both compact and deeper convolutional models while preserving a simple first-order optimization framework. The implementation of PILOT is publicly available at https://github.com/SattamAltwaim/PILOT.git