cs.CVNov 4, 2025

Automatic Extraction of Road Networks by using Teacher-Student Adaptive Structural Deep Belief Network and Its Application to Landslide Disaster

Authors: Shin KamadaTakumi Ichimura

Organizations: S. Kamada is with Hiroshima City University, Hiroshima, Japan · T. Ichimura is with Prefectural University of Hiroshima, Hiroshima, Japan

Abstract

An adaptive structural learning method of Restricted Boltzmann Machine (RBM) and Deep Belief Network (DBN) has been developed as one of prominent deep learning models. The neuron generation-annihilation algorithm in RBM and layer generation algorithm in DBN make an optimal network structure for given input during the learning. In this paper, our model is applied to an automatic recognition method of road network system, called RoadTracer. RoadTracer can generate a road map on the ground surface from aerial photograph data. A novel method of RoadTracer using the Teacher-Student based ensemble learning model of Adaptive DBN is proposed, since the road maps contain many complicated features so that a model with high representation power to detect should be required. The experimental results showed the detection accuracy of the proposed model was improved from 40.0% to 89.0% on average in the seven major cities among the test dataset. In addition, we challenged to apply our method to the detection of available roads when landslide by natural disaster is occurred, in order to rapidly obtain a way of transportation. For fast inference, a small size of the trained model was implemented on a small embedded edge device as lightweight deep learning. We reported the detection results for the satellite image before and after the rainfall disaster in Japan. This version of the article was improved the search algorithm at the border around image.

Explore similar work

Aug 4, 2026cs.CV

Distilled Roads: Generalisable Road Network Extraction Across Sensors, Resolutions, and Region

Road network segmentation from satellite imagery remains challenging due to large geographic variation in road appearance, occlusions, and domain shifts introduced by differing resolutions and sensors. Existing models, typically trained under narrow resolution--region combinations, generalise poorly to unseen environments such as rural settings, regions with distinct road materials, or imagery from new satellite platforms, often producing broken or disconnected predictions. Adapting these models to new domains usually requires retraining or fine-tuning, which is costly and risks catastrophic forgetting. In this work, we reframe global road extraction as a continual adaptation problem rather than an architectural one. Our framework combines cross-resolution knowledge distillation across a resolution-decreasing curriculum, multi-sensor training, and topology-aware supervision, yielding a single model that generalises across 0.31.00.3-1.0 m imagery from multiple satellite platforms across continents. On publicly available benchmarks, including City-Scale and Global-Scale, our model outperforms state-of-the-art results by up to 2222 F1 points and 1515 APLS points, while remaining the most efficient, with 3×3\times faster inference. Our results suggest that improved robustness across diverse sub-meter satellite imagery can be achieved through targeted training strategies, such as data curricula, distillation, and topology-aware losses, rather than increasingly complex architectures.
Sanayya, Rakshith Sathish, Ashwathi Nambiar
Jun 12, 2026cs.CV

Clay-CNN Hybrids: Leveraging Geospatial Foundation Models as Auxiliary Context for Landslide Detection

Rapid post-event landslide mapping is essential for disaster response but remains difficult to automate due to extreme class imbalance. This study evaluates whether Clay v1.5, a Geospatial Foundation Model (GFM), can improve pixel-level landslide segmentation on the Landslide4Sense (L4S) benchmark, which contains 3,799 training chips with 14 Sentinel-2 and terrain bands and approximately 2% positive pixels. We compare three strategies: Clay as the primary encoder with multi-scale residual terrain fusion, a U-Net backbone augmented with Clay semantic context at the bottleneck, and a standard U-Net baseline. The hybrid U-Net + Clay model with two-stage Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) achieved the best test F1 of 64.5 +/- 1.8% over three seeds, surpassing the Clay-only backbone (55.2 +/- 3.6%) and the U-Net baseline (59.9%). Clay as a standalone encoder underperformed the U-Net due to the absence of multi-scale skip connections, but its pretrained representations consistently improved performance when injected as auxiliary context. These findings suggest that GFMs are most effective for landslide detection when they complement spatially detailed convolutional architectures rather than replace them.
Huong Binh Vu
Apr 17, 2026cs.CV

A Benchmark Study of Segmentation Models and Adaptation Strategies for Landslide Detection from Satellite Imagery

Landslide detection from high resolution satellite imagery is a critical task for disaster response and risk assessment, yet the relative effectiveness of modern segmentation architectures and finetuning strategies for this problem remains insufficiently understood. In this work, we present a systematic benchmarking study of convolutional neural networks, transformer based segmentation models, and large pre-trained foundation models for landslide detection. Using the Globally Distributed Coseismic Landslide Dataset (GDCLD) dataset, we evaluate representative CNN- and transformer-based segmentation models alongside large pretrained foundation models under consistent training and evaluation protocols. In addition, we compare full fine-tuning with parameter-efficient fine-tuning methods, including LoRA and AdaLoRA, to assess their performance efficiency tradeoffs. Experimental results show that transformer-based models achieve strong segmentation performance, while parameter efficient finetuning reduces trainable parameters by up to 95% with comparable accuracy to full finetuning. We further analyze generalization under distribution shift by comparing validation and held-out test performance.
Md Kowsher, Weiwei Zhan, Chen Chen