Time series forecasting is typically treated as a single-pass numerical prediction task based on historical observations. However, real-world forecasting often requires expert-like reasoning, where temporal patterns, contextual cues, case-based references, and domain knowledge are jointly considered and iteratively revised. Existing statistical, deep learning, foundation, and LLM-based forecasting models mainly rely on pattern fitting, direct prompting, or static context augmentation, leaving interactive and reflective forecasting insufficiently explored. In this work, we propose AlphaCast, a human wisdom-LLM intelligence co-reasoning framework for interactive time series forecasting. AlphaCast does not require real-time human intervention; instead, it operationalizes human wisdom as structured forecasting support, including time-series features, contextual cues, case-based references, and domain knowledge. Built upon an expert-like think-forecast-reflect workflow, AlphaCast comprises three agents: an Investigator that constructs forecasting context from available evidence, a Generator that produces context-grounded forecasts, and a Reflector that evaluates plausibility and provides feedback for refinement. Extensive experiments demonstrate that AlphaCast improves forecasting accuracy and produces interpretable forecast explanations, offering a promising step toward interactive and context-aware time series forecasting.
Figures & tables
Figure 1. Main idea of AlphaCast: transforming static, single-pass forecasting into expert-like interactive reasoning with analysis, prediction, and refinement.
Figure 2. Overall architecture of AlphaCast. The three-stage process (Investigator, Generator, Reflector) bridges human wisdom and LLM intelligence, simulating expert cognition to transform forecasting into an interactive, multi-turn reasoning process.
Settings
Short-term Forecasting
Long-term Forecasting
Dataset
NP
PJM
BE
FR
DE
ETTh
ETTm
WP
SP
MOPEX
Metric
MSE
MAE
MSE
MAE
MSE
MAE
MSE
MAE
MSE
MAE
MSE
MAE
MSE
MAE
MSE
MAE
MSE
MAE
MSE
MAE
SNaive
44.89
4.10
41.39
4.65
857.12
13.70
915.80
11.15
415.72
13.36
10.75
2.47
2.75
1.19
1948.06
27.88
79.61
4.56
7.18
1.62
ARIMA
55.51
4.45
33.02
4.00
869.44
17.04
964.00
13.22
372.91
11.82
10.88
2.43
2.71
1.17
2166.64
28.77
80.48
4.60
9.19
1.85
CES
40.78
3.99
38.33
4.47
808.61
14.41
1084.71
12.14
315.58
11.45
24.22
3.65
4.12
1.48
9364.98
42.04
78.71
4.55
6.40
1.47
Prophet
57.79
5.00
52.26
5.53
992.90
16.94
1035.70
14.42
320.63
13.25
46.70
4.59
21.18
3.11
8071.24
56.06
64.81
6.44
12.39
2.50
Table 1. Overall forecasting performance under short-term and long-term forecasting on various benchmark datasets. Lower values indicate better performance. The best results are highlighted in bold , and the second-best are underlined .
Dataset
Domain
Length
Variables
Frequency
NP
Electricity Market
14,496
3
1 hour
PJM
Electricity Market
14,496
3
1 hour
BE
Electricity Market
14,496
3
1 hour
FR
Electricity Market
14,496
3
1 hour
DE
Electricity Market
14,496
3
1 hour
ETTh
Power Transformer
12,240
7
1 hour
Table 2. Overview of real-world datasets with rich contextual features. These benchmarks span multiple domains and temporal frequencies to ensure comprehensive evaluation.
Model
PJM
BE
FR
DE
SP
ETTh
ETTm
MOPEX
MSE
MAE
MSE
MAE
MSE
MAE
MSE
MAE
MSE
MAE
MSE
MAE
MSE
MAE
MSE
MAE
w/o Toolkit
30.76
4.01
685.41
13.06
812.56
9.94
277.12
10.83
55.32
4.22
14.88
3.11
5.21
1.84
9.12
1.74
w/o Reasoning
28.99
3.97
606.53
11.24
797.26
9.13
219.87
9.98
17.96
2.67
7.94
2.08
2.44
1.07
5.42
1.39
w/o Reflection
25.87
3.71
551.30
11.54
741.35
8.79
235.56
11.71
40.18
3.39
10.95
2.84
4.01
1.58
6.02
1.65
Full Model
25.15
3.60
536.45
9.61
721.02
7.13
193.83
9.93
13.29
1.84
7.64
2.02
2.41
1.06
4.77
1.35
Table 3. Ablation study of AlphaCast. “w/o Toolkit”, “w/o Reasoning”, and “w/o Reflection” remove the forecasting toolkit, reasoning-based generation, and reflective validation, respectively.
Figure 3. Component-wise ablation of contextual input and its impact on model performance.
Figure 4. Comparison of forecasting performance across different LLM backbones on multiple datasets.
Figure 5. Feature-level and model-level analysis of AlphaCast across datasets. Selection frequencies (%). Features: top 8 of 20, normalized within those shown. Models: displayed candidate configurations only, not the full set of candidates.
Datasets
BE
DE
WP
ETTm
MOPEX
w/o Feature Set
624.27
221.97
2442.10
3.60
5.69
w/o Contextual Repository
613.26
231.13
2001.32
3.65
5.82
w/o Case Library
607.57
253.10
1670.63
3.90
4.93
w/o Knowledge Base
641.52
211.77
2579.32
4.49
6.57
Full Model
536.45
193.83
1548.83
2.41
4.77
Table 4. Impact analysis of forecasting toolkit components on overall performance, using MSE as the evaluation metric.
Figure 6. A case study of AlphaCast on MOPEX streamflow forecasting, illustrating how contextual preparation, generative reasoning, and reflective validation improve the accuracy and plausibility of the target prediction.
Figure 7. Impact of cluster number. Moderate granularity balances specific matching with stable case-based prediction.
Datasets
BE
PJM
WP
Metric
MSE
MAE
MSE
MAE
MSE
MAE
Step-wise Generation
616.03
10.88
31.87
4.10
2164.37
29.83
Rollout Generation
597.89
11.03
30.04
3.92
2305.87
30.18
Whole-horizon Generation (Ours)
536.45
9.61
25.15
3.60
1548.83
24.54
Table 5. Impact of generation strategies. Whole-horizon generation consistently outperforms step-wise and rollout generation across all evaluated datasets.
Appendix figures & tables2 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
Dataset
NP
PJM
BE
FR
DE
ETTh
ETTm
WP
SP
MOPEX
Metric
MSE
MAE
MSE
MAE
MSE
MAE
MSE
MAE
MSE
MAE
MSE
MAE
MSE
MAE
MSE
MAE
MSE
MAE
MSE
MAE
HistoricAverage
54.43
5.23
108.61
8.10
745.45
16.74
955.66
14.63
381.71
14.57
10.31
2.57
3.30
1.31
2671.84
36.53
59.76
6.13
6.14
1.71
SNaive
44.89
4.10
41.39
4.65
857.12
13.70
915.80
11.15
415.72
13.36
10.75
2.47
2.75
1.19
1948.06
27.88
79.61
4.56
7.18
1.62
ARIMA
55.51
4.45
33.02
4.00
869.44
17.04
964.00
13.22
372.91
11.82
10.88
2.43
2.71
1.17
2166.64
28.77
80.48
4.60
9.19
1.85
Theta
60.11
4.78
36.07
4.30
750.76
13.84
855.15
11.28
424.50
12.53
11.77
2.54
3.35
1.26
2277.53
29.88
79.98
4.56
8.06
1.78
Holt-Winters
52.30
4.49
64.06
5.06
874.59
14.73
1021.85
12.84
366.36
11.44
71.12
4.58
16.74
2.57
41607.96
107.58
131.50
5.49
1464.18
7.17
Appendix
Table 6. Forecasting performance on short-term and long-term benchmarks. We compare AlphaCast with each individual candidate model in the case library to show the benefit of interaction-driven reasoning and iterative refinement.
Figure 8. Qualitative comparison of predictions on four datasets (ETTm, MOPEX, WP, and DE). AlphaCast produces predictions closer to the ground truth than the cluster-based prediction, especially under periodic or volatile patterns.
Time series forecasting predicts future values from ordered observations using statistical, neural, and probabilistic models to support decisions under uncertainty.
Time series forecasting is fundamental to decision-making in complex systems, where future dynamics are influenced not only by historical observations but also by evolving contextual features. Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have extended forecasting beyond numerical extrapolation toward context-aware reasoning. However, existing approaches often lack explicit mechanisms to identify relevant contexts, reason about their impacts, and validate forecasts against temporal and domain constraints. In this work, we propose CastFSR, an agentic framework that formulates context-aware forecasting as a Fast--Slow--Reflect workflow. In fast thinking, CastFSR profiles observations and selects lightweight forecasters to construct a data-driven forecast prior. In slow deliberation, it retrieves contextual evidence, adaptively determines informative look-back windows, and reasons about how contexts reshape future dynamics. In reflection, it iteratively refines forecasts to ensure temporal, contextual, and domain consistency. CastFSR supports both training-free inference with off-the-shelf LLMs and efficient deployment through a two-stage SFT and reinforcement learning strategy that transfers its orchestration capability to compact LLMs. Extensive experiments on public datasets demonstrate that CastFSR consistently outperforms representative baselines. Our code is available at https://github.com/Xiaoyu-Tao/CastFSR.
Xiaoyu Tao, Mingyue Cheng, Bokai Pan +6
State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Intelligence, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui Province, China
Time series forecasting is a fundamental task in temporal data analytics, and large language model (LLM)-based agents offer a promising paradigm through autonomous tool interaction and evidence-grounded reasoning. However, two fundamental challenges remain: how to acquire forecast-relevant evidence through adaptive tool interactions, and how to translate such evidence into accurate numerical predictions. To address these challenges, we propose CastFlow, a role-specialized agentic forecasting framework that bridges general-purpose tool reasoning and specialized temporal forecasting. Specifically, CastFlow introduces an Experience Memory that distills successful tool-use trajectories from training data, guiding a frozen LLM to orchestrate a multi-view toolkit for evidence acquisition. A lightweight specialized LLM then performs evidence-grounded temporal reasoning to refine an ensemble forecasting prior. To enhance this capability, we develop a two-stage training strategy combining supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards, where final forecasting outcomes of the overall workflow guide the optimization of the specialized model. Extensive experiments on ten real-world benchmarks demonstrate that CastFlow outperforms competitive baselines on nine datasets. Our findings highlight the importance of bridging autonomous evidence acquisition and specialized temporal reasoning for accurate and adaptive agentic forecasting. The source code is available at https://github.com/Forever-Pan/CastFlow.
Bokai Pan, Mingyue Cheng, Xiaoyu Tao +6
State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Intelligence, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China
Most time series (TS) models are specialized for a single task, either understanding (i.e., returning text answers about a TS) or generation (i.e., returning a numeric forecast). Only recently have unified models begun to handle the two within a single architecture. Even these models, however, produce the two outputs as task-separated paths and cannot predict a series and explain why that prediction arises within a single coherent response. In this paper, we argue for a task-fused model that jointly produces 1) prediction (generation) and 2) selfexplanation (understanding), thereby integrating 1) numerical TS forecasting and 2) interpretable text reasoning within a single response. To enable the systematic study of this capability, we present both a benchmark and a recipe that jointly address the two tasks. The benchmark, ReasonTS-Bench, identifies five fundamental patterns underlying TS and enables the joint evaluation of both tasks. ReasonCast, our recipe for finetuning any LLM to perform both tasks jointly, yields a model that generates a reasoning chain and a forecast together in a single autoregressive pass. Extensive experiments show that ReasonCast outperforms both LLMs and TS models on prediction accuracy while producing verifiable, causal reasoning. Code is available at: https://github.com/seunghan96/reasoncast.